Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement
Justicia Islamica Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Sosial (Journal of Law and Social Studies) is partnering bebestari national journal published twice a year in print and online by the Faculty of Shariah IAIN Ponorogo. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing articles in Theosophy, including writers, editors council, bebestari partners and publishers. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.
Ethical Guidelines Publishing
Publication of an article in the Justicia Islamica is an essential building block in the development of a coherent network of knowledge and respected. This is a direct reflection of the quality of work of authors and institutions that support them. The articles were reviewed to support and contain the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved in publishing, namely: writer, editor of the journal, bebestari partners, publishers, and society.
Faculty of Shariah IAIN Ponorogo as the publisher responsible for escorting Justicia Islamica all stages of publishing seriously and recognizes the ethical responsibilities and other responsibilities. Institutions other than committed to ensuring that the print ads and other commercial income have no impact or influence on editorial decisions is also committed to assisting communication with journal managers and/or issuer to another, if deemed useful and necessary.
ALLEGATIONS OF REASEARCH MISCONDUCT
Research misconduct means fabrication, falsification, citation manipulation, or plagiarism in producing, performing, or reviewing research and writing article by authors, or in reporting research results. When authors are found to have been involved with research misconduct or other serious irregularities involving articles that have been published in scientific journals, Editors have a responsibility to ensure the accuracy and integrity of the scientific record.
In cases of suspected misconduct, the Editors and Editorial Board will use the best practices of COPE to assist them to resolve the complaint and address the misconduct fairly. This will include an investigation of the allegation by the Editors. A submitted manuscript that is found to contain such misconduct will be rejected. In cases where a published paper is found to contain such misconduct, a retraction can be published and will be linked to the original article.
The first step involves determining the validity of the allegation and an assessment of whether the allegation is consistent with the definition of research misconduct. This initial step also involves determining whether the individuals alleging misconduct have relevant conflicts of interest.
If scientific misconduct or the presence of other substantial research irregularities is a possibility, the allegations are shared with the corresponding author, who, on behalf of all of the coauthors, is requested to provide a detailed response. After the response is received and evaluated, additional review and involvement of experts (such as statistical reviewers) may be obtained. For cases in which it is unlikely that misconduct has occurred, clarifications, additional analyses, or both, published as letters to the editor, and often including a correction notice and correction to the published article are sufficient.
Institutions are expected to conduct an appropriate and thorough investigation of allegations of scientific misconduct. Ultimately, authors, journals, and institutions have an important obligation to ensure the accuracy of the scientific record. By responding appropriately to concerns about scientific misconduct, and taking necessary actions based on evaluation of these concerns, such as corrections, retractions with replacement, and retractions, Justicia Islamica will continue to fulfill the responsibilities of ensuring the validity and integrity of the scientific record.
AUTHORSHIP OF THE PAPER
Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.
COMPLAINTS AND APPEALS
Justicia Islamica will have a clearly procedure for handling complaints against the journal, Editorial Staff, Editorial Board or Publisher. The complaints will be clarified to respected personal with respect to case of complaint. The scope of complaints include anything related to journal business process, i.e. editorial process, found citation manipulation, unfair editor/reviewer, peer-review manipulation, etc. The complaint cases will be processed according to COPE guideline. The complaint cases should be sent by email to: email@example.com
CONFLICT OF INTEREST/COMPETING INTERESTS
All authors must disclose in their text any conflict of interest whether substantive or financial that might be interpreted to affect the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project must be disclosed. Material that is not approved in the proposed text may not be used in the research of editors who without the consent of the author, we are approved to continue working and the rights of others.
DATA AND REPRODUCIBILITY
Raw data access should be provided for review editorial need
If the research work involves chemicals, human, animals, procedures or equipment that have any unusual hazards inherent in their use, the author must clearly identify these in the manuscript in order to obey ethical conduct of research using animals and human subjects. If required, Authors must provide legal ethical clearance from the association or legal organization.
If the research involves confidential data and of business/marketing practices, authors should clearly justify this matter whether the data or information will be hidden securely or not.
POST-PUBLICATION DISCUSSIONS AND CORRECTIONS
Justicia Islamica accepts discussion and corrections on published articles by reader. In case the reader giving discussions and corrections toward a published article, the reader can contact by email to Editor in Chief by explaining the discussions and corrections. If accepted (by Editor in Chief), the discussions and correction will be published in next issue as Letter to Editor. Respected Authors can reply/answer the discussions and corrections from the reader by sending the reply to Editor in Chief. Therefore, Editors may publish the answer as Reply to Letter to Editor.