Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Malpractice Statement

Journal Justicia Islamica is partnering bebestari national journal published twice a year in print and online by the Department of Shariah and Islamic Economics STAIN Ponorogo. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in publishing articles in Theosophy, including writers, editors council, bebestari partners and publishers. This statement is based on COPE's Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.

Ethical Guidelines Publishing

Publication of an article in the Journal justicia Islamica is an essential building block in the development of a coherent network of knowledge and respected. This is a direct reflection of the quality of work of authors and institutions that support them. The articles were reviewed to support and contain the scientific method. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected of all parties involved in publishing, namely: writer, editor of the journal, bebestari partners, publishers, and society.

Department of Shari'ah and Islamic Economics STAIN Ponorogo as the publisher responsible for escorting Islamica Journal justicia all stages of publishing seriously and recognizes the ethical responsibilities and other responsibilities. Institutions other than committed to ensuring that the print ads and other commercial income have no impact or influence on editorial decisions is also committed to assisting communication with journal managers and/or issuer to another, if deemed useful and necessary.

Decisions Publishing

Journal editors responsible for deciding justicia Islamica published articles. Validation of the work and the sense of centrality for researchers and readers should always push the decision. The editor can be guided by a policy board of editors of the journal and is limited by law as to be enforced regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism (plagiarism). Editors can confer with other editors or the assessment team in making this decision.

Fair Treatment

Editors always judge a script based on their intellectual content regardless of race, gender, sexual orientation, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, nationality, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editors and staff editors must not disclose any information regarding the submitted manuscript to anyone other than the author, expert editors, bebestari partners and publishers.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest

The materials disclosed in an unpublished manuscript submitted should not be used in the editor's own research without the express written consent of the author clear.

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Rating Options Bebestari assist the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also help the author improve his writing.


Each assessor chose who are not qualified to judge the research reported in a manuscript or knows that rapid review will not have to notify the editor and rid itself of the assessment process.


Each manuscript is accepted to be judged should be treated as confidential documents. The document should not be shown or discussed with others unless authorized by the editor.

Objectivity standards

Assessment should be conducted objectively. Critics are personal to the author is not justified. Assessors should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Recognition Source

Assessors should identify relevant published work that is not cited by the author. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by relevant quotes. An appraiser should also ask the editor's attention to the similarity or overlap between the manuscript assessed and other writings have been published.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest

Confidential information or opinion obtained through assessment bebestari partners must be kept secret and should not be used for private purposes. The assessor should not consider manuscripts in which they have a conflict of interest that comes from relationships or connections that are competition, cooperation, or other with any author, company, or institution related to writing.

Reporting standards

The author should present an accurate account of the work created and discussion on significance. Basic data should be represented accurately in writing. An article should include sufficient detail and references to permit others to repeat the work. Statements fraudulent or intentionally inaccurate constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written works that are entirely original and that they have quoted correctly when using the work and/or words of others.

Publishing Ganda, repetition or Coincided

A writer is generally not publish the manuscript which essentially describes the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Recognition Source

Fair recognition of the work of others must always be given. The authors should cite the publication of influence in determining the nature of the work being reported.

Authorship Posts

Authorship should be limited to those who make an important contribution to the conception, design, execution or interpretation of the study were reported. All the people who made important contributions should be listed as co-author (co-authors). If there are other people who participated in certain important aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as a contributor (contributors). The author is right must ensure that all appropriate co-authors included in the article and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Notice and Conflicts of Interest

All the writers must notify in their manuscript any financial or other conflicts that may conflict substantive thought to affect the results or interpretation of their manuscript. Entire financial support for the project must be notified.

The fundamental error in the works published

If an author finds errors or inaccuracies meaning in the work of publication, the duty of the writer to promptly notify the journal.