Membangun Literasi Demokrasi Mahasiswa di Perguruan Tinggi melalui Pendekatan Case Method

  • Wahyudin Fitriyana Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
  • Muhammad Januar Ibnu Adham Universitas Singaperbangsa Karawang
Abstract views: 327 , PDF downloads: 399
Keywords: Case Method, Literacy, Democratic

Abstract

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to build students' democratic literacy in higher education through the case method approach. This learning method is carried out by giving assignments to analyze cases that are developing at this time by contextualizing the material being discussed. The research method used in this writing is the expost facto method. Techniques in data collection in this study used tests, observations and questionnaires with the help of google form. The population participants of this study were FKIP students in one of the Karawang universities, with a sample of Social Education study program students. The results showed that learning using the case method approach is one of the learning models that can stimulate students in building democratic literacy, because there are demands faced by students as citizens. The first challenge is that students enter the work environment, this guidance not only encourages students to have skills in accordance with their knowledge but also requires students to be equipped with good graduate morals and ethics and the ability to work with others, secondly building citizens in this context is a critical and responsible student and participating in developing political literacy.

 

Abstrak

Tujuan penelitian ini membangun literasi demokrasi mahasiswa di perguruna tinggi melalui pendekatan case method. Metode pembelajaran ini dilaksanakan dengan pemberian tugas menganalisis kasus yang berkembang pada saat ini dengan mengkontekstualkan pada materi yang sedang dibahas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah metode expost  facto. Teknik dalam pengumpulan data pada penelitian ini menggunakan tes, observasi dan anggket dengan bantuan google form. Partisipan populasi penelitian ini yaitu mahasiswa FKIP di salah satu perguruan tinggi karawang, dengan sample mahasiswa Prodi IPS. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa pembelajaran dengan menggunakan pendekatan case method merupakan salah satu model pembelajaran yang dapat merangsang mahasiswa dalam membangun literasi demokrasi, karena ada tuntunan yang dihadapi mahasiswa sebagai warganegara. Tantangan pertama mahasiswa masuk dalam lingkungan pekerjaan, tuntunan ini bukan hanya mendorong mahasiswa memiliki keterampilan sesuai dengan keilmuannya tetapi juga mendorang mahasiswa dibekali moral dan etika lulusan yang baik serta kemampuan untuk bekerja dengan orang lain, kedua membangun warganegara dalam konteks ini adalah mahasiswa yang kritis dan bertanggung jawab serta ikut serta berpartisipatif mengembangkan literasi politik

References

Aronowitz, S. 2000. The Knowledge Factory: Dismantling the Corporate University and Creating True Higher Learning. Boston: Beacon Press.

Boontinand, Vachararutai. "Educating for citizenship in a fragile democracy: interrogating civic agenda in Thai higher education." Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education (2021): 1-17.

Choo, S. S. 2015. “Citizenship Education in Asia.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 35 (2): 149–152. doi:10.1080/02188791.2015.1048764

Cole, R. M., and W. F. Heinecke. 2015. “The Civic Classroom in Higher Education: Contested Terrain.” Citizenship Teaching and Learning 10 (2): 185–202. doi:10.1386/ctl.10.2.185_1.

Deželan, T., and A. Maksuti. 2014. “The Relevance of Higher Education in Slovenia for Creating Virtuous Citizens and a Working Democracy: An Underexploited Source?” In Citizenship, Democracy and Higher Education in Europe, Canada and the USA, edited by J. Laker, C. Naval, and K. Mrnjaus, 147–172. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

Doong, S. 2008. “Taiwan’s New Citizenship Curriculum: Changes and Challenges.” In Citizenship Curriculum in Asia and the Pacific, edited by D. L. Grossman, W. O. Lee, and K. J. Kennedy, 43–60. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

Frazer, E. 2008. “Key Perspectives, Traditions and Disciplines: Overview.” In The SAGE Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Democracy, edited by J. Arthur, I. Davies, and C. Hahn, 281–291. London: SAGE.

Gutmann, A. 1999. Democratic Education. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Harkavy, I. 2006. “The Role of Universities in Advancing Citizenship and Social Justice in the 21st Century.” Education, Citizenship and Social Justice 1 (1): 5–37. doi:10.1177/1746197906060711

Hung, C.-Y. 2015. “Tradition Meets Pluralism: The Receding Confucian Values in the Taiwanese Citizenship Curriculum.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 35 (2): 176–190. doi:10.1080/ 02188791.2014.934782.

JAMALUDIN, Jamaludin; ALANUR, Shofia Nurun. Pengembangan Civic Knowledge Dan Literasi Informasi Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Melalui Case Method Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Pancasila Dan Kewarganegaraan. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2021, 11.01: 28-36.

Kennedy, K. J. 2008. “Globalised Economies and Liberalised Curriculum: New Challenges for National Citizenship Education.” In Citizenship Curriculum in Asia and the Pacific, edited by D. L. Grossman, W. O. Lee, and K. J. Kennedy, 13–26. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

Lee, W. O. 2004. “Emerging Concepts of Citizenship in Ithe Asian Context.” In Citizenship Education in Asia and the Pacific: Concepts and Issues, edited by W. O. Lee, D. L. Grossman, K. J. Kennedy, and G. P. Fairbrother, 25–35. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre.

Lee, W. O. 2008. “Tensions and Contensions in Citizenship Curriculum in Asia and the Pacific.” In Citizenship Curriculum in Asia and the Pacific, edited by D. L. Grossman, W. O. Lee, and K. J. Kennedy, 215–231. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre

Levine, P. 2006. FACT SHEET Higher Education and Civic Engagement: Summary. Maryland: School of Public Policy, University of Maryland.

Lipset, S. M. 1959. “Some Social Requisites for Democracy: Economic Development and Political Legitimacy.” American Political Science Review, No 53: 69–105. doi:10.2307/1951731

Marmoah, S., Poerwanti, J. I., Sutami, J. I., & Kentingan, J. (2022). MANAJEMEN PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS STUDI KASUS (CASE METHOD). 2022.

McCowan, T. 2012. “Opening Spaces for Citizenship in Higher Education: Three Initiatives in English Universities.” Studies in Higher Education 37 (1): 51–67. doi:10.1080/03075079.2010.493934.

Mori, C., and I. Davies. 2015. “Citizenship Education in Civics Textbooks in the Japanese Junior High School Curriculum.” Asia Pacific Journal of Education 35 (2): 153–175. doi:10.1080/ 02188791.2014.959468.

Scott, J. C. 2006. “The Mission of the University: Medieval to Postmodern Transformations.” Journal of Higher Education 77 (1): 1–39. doi:10.1353/jhe.2006.0007.

Seyedali., A., B. Jamilah, M. Othman, S. Hassan, B. Abu Samah, and J. D’Silva. 2014. “Understanding Meaning and Characteristics of Civic Development in Higher Education.” Asian Social Science 10 (16): 50–60. doi:10.5539/ass.v10n16p50.

Sidebang, R. (2021). Pengaruh Disiplin Belajar Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Pada Siswa Kelas iii Sd Negeri 040528 Sukadame T.P. 2020/2021. ESJ (Elementary School Journal), 11(1), 15–22.

Smith, G., R. Ottewill, E. Jubb, E. Sperling, and M. Wyman. 2008. “Teaching Citizenship in Higher Education.” European Political Science 7 (2): 135–143. doi:10.1057/eps.2008.8

Subcommittee of the Education Policy Reform on Civic Education. 2011. Strategy for the Development of Education for Citizenship Education 2010-2018. Bangkok: Office of the Education Council. (in Thai.

Sutisna, Agus. "Peningkatan literasi politik pemilih pemula melalui pendekatan pembelajaran kontekstual." Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan FKIP. Vol. 1. No. 2. 2017.

Watson, K. 1980. Educational Development in Thailand. Hong Kong: Heinemann Asia.

Westheimer, J., and J. Kahne. 2004. “What Kind of Citizen? the Politics of Educating for Democracy.” American Educational Research Journal 41 (2): 237–269. doi:10.3102/ 00028312041002237.

Widyaningrum, H. (2016). Pentingnya Strategi Pembelajaran Inovatif Dalam Menghadapi Kreativitas Siswa Di Masa Depan. Proceedings International Seminar FoE (Faculty of Education).268-277

Wirawati, Denik. (2017). Gerakan Literasi Mahasiswa Melalui Kuliah Membaca Kritis Dan Kreatif: Sebuah Pengalaman Nyata. PIBSI XXXIX, Semarang 7-8 November 2017

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-03-15
Section
Articles