Dualisme Kompetensi Peradilan Permohonan Pengangkatan Anak Bagi Pemohon Yang Beragama Islam

  • Nugroho Noto Diharjo
Abstract views: 241 , PDF downloads: 451
Keywords: authorization dualism, child adoption, different legal consequence

Abstract

Abstract: The Child adoption application for Moslem applicants and Moslem adopted children potential are legal by the State court and the religion court in pratice, for this reason this matter causes the competency dualism in accepting, examining, and assigning that child adoption application. in the Mojokerto state court Decicion No.04/Pdt P/2012//PN Mkt, the Purwokerto faith courtroom Desicion No.a hundred thirty/Pdt P/2014/PA Pwt. the ones fourt courtsstate that they are legal to accept, examine and assign the adoption of children. according to the research, by way of yuridis normative approch sesult of the child adoption application proposed by means of Moslem applicants, both in the religion court and trough the state court have the authority to just accept, have a look at, grant, and assign the child adoption application, but with different legal consideration. inside the state court decision, the judicial legal consideration refers back to the common legislation law such as the child Protrction laws, the population Administrations law, the Goverment Ordinance, and the supreme court circular, however, the religious court in based on the Islamic law compilation. The legal consequences caused by child adoption decision carried out inside the state court, the adopted kids have inheritance rights from the adoptive mother and father, at the same time as in the religious Courts, the adoyed children do not server ties with the biological parents. consequently the adopted children do not inherit property from the adoptive mother and father.

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abdoellah, Priyatmanto. Revitalisasi Kewenangan PTUN, Yogyakarta, Cahaya Atma Pustaka. 2016.

Afdol, “Pengangkatan Anak dan Aspeknya Menurut Hukum Adat”, Jurnal Suara Uldilag, Pokja Perdata MARI, Jakarta, Vol 3 No.XI September 2007

Arto, Mukti, “Garis batas kekuasaan Pengadilan Agama dan Pengadilan Negeri”, Jurnal Varia Peradilan, IKAHI, Jakarta No.253 Tahun Ke- XXI Bulan Desember 2006

Azhari, Tahir, “Anak Angkat dalam Perpektif Hukum Islam dan Kewenangan Pengadilan Agama Dalam Pengangkatan Anak”, Jurnal Uldilag, Jakarta Vol 3 No.XI September 2007

Fauzan, “Perbedaan Mendasar Akibat Hukum Penetapan Pengangkatan Anak di Pengadilan Negeri dan Pengadilan Agama”, Jurnal Varia Peradilan, Jakarta, Tahun XXII No. 256 Maret 2007

Harahap, Yahya, Hukum Acara Perdata Tentang Gugatan, Persidangan,Penyitaan, Pembuktian dan Putusan Pengadilan, Jakarta, Sinar Grafika. 2005.

Kabah, Rifyal, “Pengangkatan Anak Dalam Undang-Undang No 3 Tahun 2006 Tentang Peradilan Agama dan akibatnya”, Jurnal Varia Peradilan, IHAHI, Tahun ke XXI No. 248 Juli 2006

Mahmud Marzuki, Peter. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta, Penerbit Kencana Mertokusumo. , 2013 .

Sudikno. Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta Penerbit Liberty. 2010.

Sumiarni, Endang. Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Dalam Hukum Keluarga. Yogyakarta, Atmajaya. 2000.

Sudiyat, Iman. Hukum Adat Sketsa Asas, Yogyakarta, Penerbit Liberty Sutantio. 1990.

Retnowulan. Hukum Acara Perdata Dalam Teori Dan Praktik. Bandung, PT Mndar Maju. 1997.

Soekanto, Soerjono. Intisari Hukum Keluarga. Bandung, Penerbit Alumni . 1980.

Subekti, Iman Winarsih, “Pengaturan dan Akibat Hukum Pengangkatan Anak Menurut Hukum Perdata”, Jurnal Suara Uldilag, Pokja Perdata Agama Vol 3No. XI, September 2007

Undang-Undang Tentang Perlindungan Anak, UU No.23 Tahun 2002, LN No 109 Tahun 2002 TLN No. 4235

Undang-Undang Administrasi Kependudukan, UU No. 23 Tahun 2006. LN No 124 Tahun 2006 TLN No.4674

Undang-Undang Kekuasaan Kehakiman UU No. 48 Tahun 2009 LN No. 157 Tahun 2009 TLN 5976.

Wignjodippuro. Pengantar dan Asas-Asas Hukum Adat. Jakarta Gunung Agung. 1995

PlumX Metrics

Published
2021-12-12
Section
Articles