Mafātiḥ al-Ghaib in Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī and Tafsīr al-Mishbāh
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21154/tafasir.v2i2.11449Keywords:
Mafātiḥ al-Ghaib, Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī, Tafsīr al-MishbāhAbstract
Differences in interpretation are often found among mufassirs regarding a verse or sūrah of the Quran. For instance, the interpretation of sūrah Luqmān verse 34 highlights a striking difference between classical mufassirs like Ibn Jarīr al-Ṭabarī and contemporary ones like M. Quraish Shihab in interpreting the verse about the five “keys to the unseen” or Mafātiḥ al-Ghaib.
This research aims to understand al-Ṭabarī and Quraish’s ideas and comprehend the differences in their interpretations of sūrah Luqmān verse 34 based on the books Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī and Tafsīr al-Mishbāh. This research uses a qualitative approach with comparative analysis. Data collection uses documentation techniques from both books.
The findings show that al-Ṭabarī views the five unseen elements as absolute, while Quraish sees some as absolute and others as relative. Their differences are particularly notable in interpreting the descent of rain and what is in the womb, with al-Ṭabarī considering them absolute secrets and Quraish viewing them as relative. However, both interpret the timing of the apocalypse, what someone will do tomorrow, and where someone will die as absolute secrets. These differences may stem from methodological shifts and varying social contexts during interpretation, as well as different sources of opinion.
References
Adistia, Yusril Nur Baitul Izzah, Nikmah, & Muhammad Afif. “Telaah Kitab Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī dalam QS Al-Maidah Ayat 51.” al-Munir: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an dan Tafsir, Vol. 1, No. 2 (2019): 55-77.
Ali, Muhammad Ma’shum bin. Al-Amthilah al-Taṣrīfiyyah. Kendal: Pustaka Amanah.
Al-Shaykh, ‘Abd Allāh ibn Muḥammad ibn ‘Abd al-Raḥmān ibn Isḥāq Āl. Tafsīr Ibn Kathīr Jilid 6, terj. M. Abdul Ghoffar E.M. & Abu Ihsan Al-Atsari. Bogor: Pustaka Imam Asy-Syafi’i, 2017.
Al-Ṭabarī, Ibn Jarir. Tafsīr al-Ṭabarī Jilid 20, Tahqiq: Ahmad Abdurraziq Al Bakri, et.al. Jakarta: Pustaka Azzam, 2007.
Arni, Jani. Metode Penelitian Tafsir. Riau: Daulat Riau, 2013.
Azis. “Metodologi Penelitian, Corak dan Pendekatan Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Jurnal Komunikasi dan Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2016): 1-19.
Bahren, Rina Susanti Abidin & Sabil Mokodenseho. “Metode dan Corak Penafsiran Ath-Thabari.” Mushaf Journal: Jurnal Ilmu Al Quran dan Hadis, Vol. 3, No. 1 (2023): 151-166.
Dozan, Wely. “Analisis Pergeseran Shifting Paradigm Penafsiran: Studi Komparatif Tafsir Era Klasik dan Kontemporer.” At-Tibyan: Jurnal Ilmu Alqur’an dan Tafsir, Vol. 5, No. 1 (2020): 38-56.
Hakim, Lukman Nul. Metode Penelitian Tafsir. Palembang: NoerFikri, 2019.
Hidayat, Hamdan. “Sejarah Perkembangan Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Al-Munir, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2020): 30-76.
Makmur, N., Nurun N.B., M. Riyan H., Mahfidatul K., & Aidah M.K. “Studi Komparatif Konsep Kenabian dalam Kitab Suci Al-Qur’an, Tanakh, Bibel dan Weda.” Abrahamic Religions: Jurnal Studi Agama-Agama (ARJ), Vol. 2, No. 1 (2022): 90-105.
Malula, Mustahidin & Reza Adeputra Tohis. “Metodologi Tafsir Al-Qur’an.” Al-Mustafid: Jurnal of Quran and Hadith Studies, Vol. 2, No. 1 (2023): 12-22.
Munawwir, Ahmad Warson. Kamus Al-Munawwir. Surabaya: Pustaka Progressif, 2020.
Mursyid, Ali. “Sisi-Sisi Keindahan Bahasa Al-Qur’an.” Misykat, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2019): 23-60.
Nofitayanti, Aam Abdussalam & Edi Suresman. “Studi Komparasi Metode Tafsir Tahlily dan Metode Tafsir Muqaran.” Civilization Research: Journal Of Islamic Studies, Vol. 1, No. 1 (2022): 54-76.
Razi, A. Fahrur & Niswatur Rokhmah. “Tafsir Klasik: Analisis terhadap Kitab Tafsir Era Klasik.” Kaca: Jurnal Jurusan Ushuluddin, Vol. 9, No. 2 (2019): 148-167.
Riḍā, Muḥammad Rashīd. Tafsīr al-Manar Juz 7. Kairo: Dār al-Manar, 1947.
Shihab, M. Quraish. Kaidah Tafsir: Syarat, Ketentuan, dan Aturan yang Patut Anda Ketahui dalam Memahami Ayat-Ayat Al-Qur’an. Tangerang: Lentera Hati, 2015.
---------. Mukjizat Al-Qur’an: Ditinjau dari Aspek Kebahasaan, Isyarat Ilmiah, dan Pemberitaan Gaib. Bandung: Mizan, 1997.
---------. Tafsīr al-Mishbāh: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an Volume 4. Ciputat: Lentera Hati, 2000.
---------. Tafsīr al-Mishbāh: Pesan, Kesan, dan Keserasian Al-Qur’an Volume 11. Ciputat: Lentera Hati, 2003.
Sinaga, Agnova Senida, Anggiat Sinurat & Hisarma Saragih, “Konsep Tafsir, Ta’wil, dan Terjemah,” PESHUM: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Humaniora, Vol. 4, No. 2 (2025): 2271-2280.
Umar, A.F., Eka P.S., Rosalina C.S., Moh. Muchlis M.A., & Bahrul U.A.F.A.Y. “I’jaz Al-Qur’an; Menyingkap Kemukjizatan Bahasa, Ilmu Pengetahuan, dan Aspek Ghaib dalam Al-Qur’an.” Publishing: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, Vol. 1, No. 3 (2024): 1-14.
Wardani. Tren Perkembangan Pemikiran Kontemporer Metodologi Tafsir Al-Qur’an di Indonesia. Banjarmasin: Antasari Press, 2017.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ummi Muhklisoh, Faiq Ainurrofiq

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.




