Nurturing Nationalism: A Qualitative Study of the Role of the Ansor Youth Movement and Muhammadiyah Youth in Defending the Nation as a Form of Civic Involvement

Authors

  • Nursanda Rizki Adhari Universitas Islam Syekh Yusuf, Tangerang, Indonesia
  • Dadang Sundawa Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Cecep Darmawan Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Syaifullah Syaifullah Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung, Indonesia
  • Abdul Basit Universitas Panca Marga, Probolinggo, Indonesia

Keywords:

National Defense, Civic Engagement, Islamic Youth, GP Ansor, Muhammadiyah Youth, Active Citizenship, National Resilience

Abstract

This article explores the strategic contributions of two Islamic-based youth organizations. Ansor Youth Movement and Muhammadiyah Youth are working to actualize the values of national defense and strengthen civic engagement amid contemporary socio-political challenges in Indonesia. The background of this study is rooted in the urgent need to revitalize the concept of national defense, which is no longer limited to militaristic dimensions but also involves the role of citizens in maintaining social integration, interfaith tolerance, and national unity. This research employs a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study method, conducted in Tangerang Regency, Banten Province. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, participatory observations, and document analysis, then analyzed using data reduction, thematic categorization, and interpretive meaning analysis. The findings reveal that the actualization of national defense by both organizations is implemented through cadre education, leadership training, and public advocacy grounded in national and religious values. Their involvement in cross-identity social actions, collaboration with the government, and efforts to counter intolerance serve as tangible forms of active citizenship. Furthermore, the development of social capital through solidarity, norms of reciprocity, and trust networks has proven crucial in strengthening civic resilience and national security. This article recommends the enhancement of harmony between youth organizations, government institutions, and educational entities in constructing an inclusive, critical, and value-based model of citizenship.

References

Afiyanto, H., & Sun, M. (2024). ULUR-ULUR TRADITION: Negotiations on Local Islam and Tulungagung Culture. ASANKA : Journal of Social Science and Education, 5(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v5i2.9074

Ainin, I. K., & Tabrin, N. N. I. (2024). Social Acceptance Among Children with Learning Difficulties. ASANKA : Journal of Social Science and Education, 5(2), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v5i2.9784

Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origins and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.

Benhabib, S. (1992). Situating the self: Gender, community, and postmodernism in contemporary ethics. New York: Routledge.

Bogdan, R. C., & Taylor, S. J. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York: Wiley.

Buzan, B. (1991). People, states, and fear: An agenda for international security studies in the post-Cold War era (2nd ed.). Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.

Castells, M. (2012). Networks of outrage and hope: Social movements in the Internet age. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: Macmillan.

Erlande, R., Komalasari, K., Taufika, R., Hardian, M., Fauzan, A., & Maharani, A. (2024). Membekali Warga Negara di Era Post-Truth: Peran Krusial Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan di Australia. ASANKA : Journal of Social Science and Education, 5(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v5i1.9097

Etzioni, A. (1995). The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown Publishers.

Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Herder and Herder.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

Gramsci, A. (1971). Selections from the prison notebooks. New York: International Publishers.

Habermas, J. (1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Ki Hajar Dewantara. (1930s). Educational ideas in a national context. (Notes from various original manuscripts and interpretations of Indonesian educational history).

Latif, Y. (2017). The plenary state: Historicity, rationality, and actuality of Pancasila. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Prayogi, R., & Rahmawati, I. (2021). Kesadaran Hukum Dalam Berlalu Lintas Siswa SMK Zaidar Yahya Kecamatan Rambah. ASANKA : Journal of Social Science and Education, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.21154/asanka.v2i1.2524

Putnam, R.D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Schlozman, K. L., Verba, S., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Smith, A.D. (1991). National identity. Reno: University of Nevada Press.

Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.

Published

2025-08-12

Issue

Section

Articles