Tepuk Sakinah and Family Resilience: an Evaluative Framework Within The Maqasid Al-Shariah Paradigm

Authors

  • Achmad Baidhowi Universitas Islam Malang
  • Shofiatul Jannah Universitas Islam Malang
  • Dwi Ari Kurniawati Universitas Islam Malang
  • Ahmad Shodiqin Al-Azhar University, Cairo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v11i1.12325

Keywords:

Tepuk Sakinah; Maqasid al-Shariah; Marriage Guidance; Islamic Family Law

Abstract

Abstract

This article explores Tepuk Sakinah as a means of internalizing the values of a harmonious family in response to high divorce rates, which indicate that premarital guidance should focus on preparing prospective couples to manage conflict, communication, finances, and family responsibilities. The objectives of this study are to analyze the relevance of the five pillars of Tepuk Sakinah to Maqasid al-Shariah, to describe its implementation in Marriage Guidance at the Jombang Subdistrict Office of Religious Affairs, and to formulate a realistic evaluation framework. This study employs a descriptive qualitative approach with a constructivist paradigm. The findings indicate that Tepuk Sakinah functions as a reminder of values during the closing session of Marriage Guidance, not as part of the marriage contract ceremony. Its five pillars align with the al-daruriyyat al-khams. Zawaj and Mitsaqan Ghalizan relate to Hifz al-nasl and Hifz al-din; Muasyarah bil maruf to Hifz al-nafs; Musyawarah to Hifz al-aql; and Taradin to Hifz al-nafs and Hifz al-mal. The evaluation framework is broken down into the orientation of Maqasid al-Shariah, micro-skills, core activities, and indicators suitable for implementation within a limited service duration. The Tepuk Sakinah evaluation is not sufficient to measure mere memorization of the pillars; rather, it must assess understanding of the values, readiness to address issues, and the applicability of the indicators. The implications of the findings suggest that Tepuk Sakinah is suitable to be positioned as a medium for the internalization of sakinah family values based on Maqasid al-Shariah.

 

Abstrak

Artikel ini mengeksplorasi Tepuk Sakinah sebagai media internalisasi nilai keluarga sakinah dalam merespons tingginya angka perceraian yang menunjukkan bahwa pembekalan pranikah perlu diarahkan pada kesiapan calon pasangan dalam mengelola konflik, komunikasi, ekonomi, dan tanggung jawab keluarga. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis relevansi lima pilar Tepuk Sakinah dengan Maqasid al-Shariah, mendeskripsikan operasionalisasinya dalam Bimbingan Perkawinan di Kantor Urusan Agama Kecamatan Jombang, serta merumuskan kerangka evaluasi yang realistis. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif deskriptif dengan paradigma konstruktivis. Hasil temuan menunjukkan bahwa Tepuk Sakinah berfungsi sebagai media pengingat nilai pada sesi penutup Bimbingan Perkawinan, bukan bagian dari prosesi akad. Lima pilarnya selaras dengan al-daruriyyat al-khams. Zawaj dan Mitsaqan Ghalizan berkaitan dengan Hifz al-nasl dan Hifz al-din, Muasyarah bil maruf dengan Hifz al-nafs, Musyawarah dengan Hifz al-aql, serta Taradin dengan Hifz al-nafs dan Hifz al-mal. Kerangka evaluasi diturunkan menjadi orientasi Maqasid al-Shariah, keterampilan mikro, aktivitas inti, dan indikator yang layak diterapkan dalam durasi layanan terbatas. Evaluasi Tepuk Sakinah tidak cukup mengukur hafalan pilar, tetapi perlu membaca pemahaman nilai, kesiapan merespons masalah, dan keterpakaian indikator. Implikasi temuan menunjukkan Tepuk Sakinah layak diposisikan sebagai media internalisasi nilai keluarga sakinah berbasis Maqasid al-Shariah.

Keywords: Tepuk Sakinah; Maqasid al-Shariah; Marriage Guidance; Islamic Family Law.

References

Agarwal, Pooja K, Ludmila D Nunes, and Janell R Blunt. “Retrieval Practice Consistently Benefits Student Learning: A Systematic Review of Applied Research in Schools and Classrooms.” Educational Psychology Review 33, no. 4 (2021): 1409–53. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09595-9.

Alfitri. “Protecting Women from Domestic Violence: Islam, Family Law, and the State in Indonesia.” Studia Islamika 27, no. 2 (2020). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36712/sdi.v27i2.9408.

Alissa Qotrunnada Munawaroh, Nur Rofiah, Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir, Iklilah Muzayyanah. Modul Bimbingan Perkawinan Untuk Calon Pengantin. Direktorat Bina KUA dan Keluarga Sakinah dan Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam Kementerian Agama RI., 2016.

Allan-Blitz, Lao Tzu, Rose Olson, and Quang Tran. “Assessment of Microfinance Interventions and Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” JAMA Network Open 6, no. 1 (2023): E2253552. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.53552.

Allen, Peg, Meagan Pilar, Callie Walsh-bailey, Cole Hooley, Stephanie Mazzucca, Cara C Lewis, Kayne D Mettert, et al. “Quantitative Measures of Health Policy Implementation Determinants and Outcomes : A Systematic Review.” Implementation Science, 2020, 1–17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-020-01007-w.

Amin Abdullah, Muhammad. “Maqāṣid Al-Sharī‘at: The Main Reference and Ethical-Spiritual Foundation for the Dynamization Process of Islamic Law.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 20, no. 2 (2021): 331–56. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v20i2.18333.

Angraini, Ramli, Mohd Nasir Badlihisham, and Abdul Kadir Firdaus Khairi. “Maqaṣid Shariah in Family Institutions: Analysis of the Prenuptial Course Module in Malaysia.” Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran Hukum Islam 19, no. 2 (2020): 247–80. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v19i2.2567.

Auda, Jasser. Maqasid Al-Shariah as Philosophy of Islamic Law A Systems Approach. Institut Pemikiran Islam Internasional (IIIT), 2008. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvkc67tg.

Aulia, Arifatu Diniyya, Firdaus Fatah Yasin Raudlotul, and Mahmud Mek Wok. “The Significance of Financial Literacy for Family Wealth Management: A Critical Study from Maqasid Perspective.” Journal of Islam in Asia 17, no. 3 (2020): 198–215.

Babaheidarian, Fareshteh, Sayedeh Zahra Masoumi, and Godratullah Roshanaei. “The Effect of Family Based Counseling on Domestic Violence in Pregnant Women Referring to Health Centers in Sahneh City, Iran, 2018.” Annals of General Psychiatry 11, no. 11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12991-021-00332-8.

Badruzaman, Dudi. “Pengaruh Pernikahan Usia Muda Terhadap Gugatan Cerai Di Pengadilan Agama Antapani Bandung.” Muslim Heritage 6, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v6i1.2653.

Binti Ali, Nurul Badriyah, Angraini Binti Ramli, and Hakimah Binti Ahmad. “Maqasid Shariah in Family Institutions: Analysis of the Prenuptial Course Module in Malaysia.” Mazahib: Jurnal Pemikiran ISlam 19, no. 2 (December 19, 2020): 247–80. https://doi.org/10.21093/mj.v19i2.2567.

Bradbury, Thomas N, and Guy Bodenmann. “Interventions for Couples.” Annual Review OfClinical Psychology 16, no. 99 (2020): 123. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-071519-020546.

Bryan, J. Weiner, C. Lewis Cara, Stanick Carmen, and J. Powell Byron. “Psychometric Assessment of Three Newly Developed Implementation Outcome Measures.” Implementation Science 12, no. Article 108 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0635-3.

Cho, Evelyn, Aaron R. Lyon, Siena K. Tugendrajch, Brigid R. Marriott, and Kristin M. Hawley. “Assessing Provider Perceptions of Training: Initial Evaluation of the Acceptability, Feasibility, and Appropriateness Scale.” Implementation Research and Practice 3 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1177/26334895221086269.

Dew, Jefferey, and Mark Jackson. “Commitment and Relationship Maintenance Behaviors as Marital Protective Factors during Economic Pressure.” Journal of Family and Economic Issues 39, no. 2 (2018): 191–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10834-017-9550-7.

E. Griffes, Sarah, Nathan R. Hardy, and Ty J. Gregson. “Couple Relationship Education Content: What We Have and What We Are Missing.” Family Process, 2023, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1111/famp.13043.

Fernanda, Bruna, Tolentino Moreira, Tatiana Salazar, Silva Pinto, Daniela Siqueira, and Veloso Starling. “Retrieval Practice in Classroom Settings : A Review of Applied.” Frontiers in Education 4, no. February (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00005.

Imam, Syafi’i, Faiqoh Ruqoyatul, and Vasco Fronzoni. “Concept of Misaqan Ghalidzan in Contemporary Interpretation of Quraish Shihab Thoughts.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 2, no. 2 (2023): 115–33. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i2.7807.

İnan Kırmızıgül, Ebra, and Savil Şahin. “The Efficacy of Web Based Marriage Preparation Education for Premarital Couples.” Sexuality and Disability 42, no. 2 (2024): 243–58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-024-09842-1.

Islam, Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat. “Surat Edaran Direktur Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam Nomor 2 Tahun 2024 Tentang Bimbingan Perkawinan Bagi Calon Pengantin.” Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam, Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia, May 2024.

Jafari, Alireza, Ali Alami, Elham Charoghchian, Ali Delshad Noghabi, and Mahbobeh Nejatian. “The Impact of Effective Communication Skills Training on the Status of Marital Burnout among Married Women.” BMC Women’s Health 21, no. 231 (2021): 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-021-01372-8.

Javadivala, Zeinab, Hamid Allahverdipour, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi, Somaye Azimi, Neda Gilani, and Vijay Kumar Chattu. “Improved Couple Satisfaction and Communication with Marriage and Relationship Programs : Are There Gender Differences ? — A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” PMC, 2021, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01719-0.

Khoiri Ridlwan, Muhammad, Ahmad Zahro, Evi Fitriana, Achmad Murtafi Haris, and Muhammed Salim. “Family Resilience of Indonesian Migrant Workers in Mataraman Region East Java Through the Lens of Maqashid Al-Usrah.” Muslim Heritage 10, no. 2 (2025): 267–82. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i2.11929.

Khoiroh, Ikmilul, Achmad Hirzan Anwari, and Fitriana Deva Yanti. “Perbandingan Batas Usia Perkawinan Di Negara-Negara Muslim Asia Dan Afrika Utara: Kajian Yuridis Dan Sosio-Kultural.” Muslim Heritage 9, no. 2 (2024).

Leleang, Andi Tenri, Fakultas Syariah, U I N Alauddin, La Ode, Ismail Ahmad, Fakultas Tarbiyah, and U I N Alauddin. “Revitalizing the Role of Kantor Urusan Agama ( KUA ) in Realizing the Sakinah Family at Bone Regency with Maqāṣid Asy-Syarî ’ Ah Perspective.” Jurnal Bimas Islam 15, no. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v15i2.608.

Littlechild, Brian, Rebecca Scot, Brian J. Taylor, and Jaroslaw Przeperski. “Relational Interventions for Intimate Partner Violence: A Systematic Narrative Review.” Research on Social Work Practice 35, no. 7 (2025): 809–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497315241287915.

Manzey, Dietrich, and Tara Radovi. “The Impact of a Mnemonic Acronym on Learning and Performing a Procedural Task and Its Resilience Toward Interruptions.” Frontiers in Psychology 10, no. November (2019): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02522.

Markman, Howard J., Alan J. Hawkins, and Scot M. Stanley. “Helping Couples Achieve Relationship Success: A Decade of Progress in Couple Relationship Education Research and Practice, 2010-2019.” Journal of Marital and Family Therapy 48, no. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/jmft.12565.

Megale, Allison, Emily Peterson, and Myrna L Friedlander. “How Effective Is Online Couple Relationship Education? A Systematic Meta-Content Review.” Contemporary Family Therapy 44, no. 3 (2022): 294–304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10591-021-09585-7.

Mohammed, Abdullahi. “A Scientometric Study of Maqasid Al-Shariah Research: Mapping the Scholarly Landscape.” Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics 10.3389/fr (2024): Article 1439407. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2024.1439407.

Munawaroh, Alissa Qotrunnada, Nur Rofiah, Faqihuddin Abdul Kodir, and Iklilah Muzayyanah. Modul Bimbingan Perkawinan Untuk Calon Pengantin. Jakarta: Direktorat Bina KUA dan Keluarga Sakinah, Direktorat Jenderal Bimbingan Masyarakat Islam, Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia, 2017.

Musawwamah, Siti, Muhammad Taufiq, and Erie Haryanto. “Resistance to Child Marriage Prevention in Indonesia and Malaysia.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 23, no. 1 (2023): 259–80. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.32014.

Nazmi, Mohd, Mohd Khalli, Suraya Sintang, and Zaenuddin Hudi Prasojo. “Shura in Mixed-Faith Family Relations : An Approach to Strengthen Family Bonds in Sabah” 95, no. 1 (2025): 1–17.

Osman, Mohd Farihal, Muhammad Nazir Alias, Muhammad Najib Abdullah, Nor Faizah Ismail, and Mohd Sham Kamis. “The Position of Maqasid Al-Shariah within Islamic Legal Sources: A Comprehensive Analysis.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 9, no. 2 (2025): 937–64. https://doi.org/10.22373/q4byre51.

Paré, Denis, and Drew B. Headley. “The Amygdala Mediates the Facilitating Influence of Emotions on Memory through Multiple Interacting Mechanisms.” Neurobiology of Stress 24, no. May (2023). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2023.100529.

Rasyid, Arbanur, and Fatahuddin Aziz Siregar. “Interreligious Marriages: Can Couples in Interfaith Marriages Live a Happy Life?” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 25, no. 1 (2025): 159–76. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v25i1.37317.

Reilly, Kathryn Louise, Sarah Kennedy, Gwenndolyn Porter, and Paul Estabrooks. “Comparing , Contrasting , and Integrating Dissemination and Implementation Outcomes Included in the RE-AIM and Implementation Outcomes Frameworks.” Frontiers in Public Health 8, no. September (2020): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2020.00430.

Rokhmad Abu. “‘Tepuk Sakinah’, Cara Kemenag Mudahkan Catin Hafal Esensi Keluarga Sakinah | Nasional | Kementerian Agama RI.” Kemenag, September 25, 2025. https://kemenag.go.id/nasional/tepuk-sakinah-cara-kemenag-mudahkan-catin-hafal-esensi-keluarga-sakinah-eYHsg.

Russell, E. Glasgow, M. Harden Samantha, and Gaglio Bridget. “RE-AIM Planning and Evaluation Framework: Adapting to New Science and Practice With a 20-Year Review.” Frontiers in Public Health 7 (2019): 64. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2019.00064.

Safdhinar, M. An Noor, Abror Dzukroni Arisy, Nasrullah, and Moh. Faza Rosyada. “Rethinking Mu’âsyarah Bil Ma’ruf: A Maqâshid Syari’ah Cum-Mubâdalah Approach.” At-Turāṡ: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 11, no. 1 (2024): 12–24. https://doi.org/10.33650/at-turas.v11i1.7281.

Saidon, Rafeah, Fadhilah Adiba Ismail, Siti Khadijah Ab Manan, and Azhar Abdul Aziz. “Preventing Illegal Marriages in the Light of Maqasid Al-Shariah.” Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities 25 (2017): 331–40.

Saleh, Juwaini, Nurullah Amri, Mustafa Kamal, Afrizal Abdullah, and Masrizal Mukhtar. “Marriage Guidance Towards Family Resilience in Aceh: A Study of Islamic Law Philosophy.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2022): 594–613. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12448.

Sidik, Mohd Suhadi Mohamed, Md Noor Saper, and Nurul’Ain Mohd Daud. “The Application of Maqasid Shariah Elements in Family and Marriage Counseling BT - Proceedings of the 1st Progress in Social Science, Humanities and Education Research Symposium (PSSHERS 2019).” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. Atlantis Press, 2020. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200824.160.

Statistik, Badan Pusat. “Jumlah Perceraian Menurut Provinsi Dan Faktor Penyebab Perceraian, 2024.” Badan Pusat Statistik. Jakarta: Badan Pusat Statistik Republik Indonesia, May 2024.

Suhadi, Mohd, Noor Azniza Ishak, and Mohd Noor. “Feedback on The Application of The Elements of Maqasid Syariah in Family and Marriage Counselling.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 5, no. 6 (2019): 1239–48.

Theresia Pasaribu, Yolanda, and Retha Arjadi. “Relational Maintenance Behavior as a Predictor of Marital Satisfaction in Commuter Marriage.” Jurnal Psikologi 50, no. 1 (2023): 104–24. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.72905.

Tiago, J. S. Moreira, A. Pinto Joana, and B. Albuquerque Pedro. “Retrieval Practice in Classroom Settings: A Review of Applied Research.” Frontiers in Education 4, no. Article 5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2019.00005.

Widyaningrum, Ratna, Sari Hernawati, Khoirun Nofik, Ma’ruf Syifaudin, and Dinda Helmi Kayana Juwita. “Islamic Socio-Religious Reflections on Early Marriage, Family Resilience, and Stunting in Sirampog, Brebes.” Muslim Heritage 10, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v10i2.11874.

Wijaya, Aksin, and Shofiyullah Muzammil. “MAQĀ(Formula Presented)IDI TAFSIR Uncovering and Presenting Maqā(Formula Presented)Id Ilāhī-Qur’anī into Contemporary Context.” Al-Jami’ah 59, no. 2 (2021): 449–78. https://doi.org/10.14421/ajis.2021.592.449-478.

Williamson, Hannah C., Julia F. Hammett, Jaclyn M. Ross, Benjamin R. Karney, and Thomas N. Bradbury. “Premarital Education and Later Relationship Help-Seeking.” Journal of Family Psychology 32, no. 2 (2018): 276–81. https://doi.org/10.1037/fam0000383.

Yavuzer, Yasemin, and Doğanülkü Hacı Arif. “Development of a Systemic Premarital Counselling Programme and Evaluating Its Impact on Young Adults’ Couple Relationships: A Pilot Study.” Development of a Systemic Premarital Counselling Programme and Evaluating Its Impact on Young Adults’ Couple Relationships: A Pilot Study 43 (2024): 5179–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-023-04715-w.

Zecky Najmudin, Muhammad, Ishaq, and Muhammad Lutfi Nur Cahyono. “The Phenomenon of ‘Marriage Is Scary’ and the Role of Premarital Guidance in Preparing the Mental and Emotional Health of Prospective Brides and Grooms.” Academia Open 10, no. 2 (2025). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.10.2025.12921.

Zeinab Javadivala, Hamid Allahverdipour, Mohammad Asghari Jafarabadi. “Improved Couple Satisfaction and Communication with Marriage and Relationship Programs: Are There Gender Differences? A Systematic Review and Meta Analysis.” Systematic Reviews 10 (2021): 178. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01719-0https://doi.org/10.1186/s13643-021-01719-0.

Published

2026-06-14