Votes Buying and Selling in General Elections: An Islamic Perspective

Penulis

  • Lina Nur Anisa Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Ngawi, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v22i2.8946

Abstrak

This article aims to discuss the practice of vote buying and selling in general elections from an Islamic perspective. This research applies a qualitative approach with library research as its method. The data collection technique employed is documentation, accompanied by data analysis techniques such as content analysis, induction, and deduction. The conclusions from the discussion in this article are as follows. First, votes buying and selling in general elections is a practice where voters’ votes are treated as commodities or merchandise in exchange for money, goods, or services. Second, from an Islamic viewpoint, votes buying and selling in general elections is a reprehensible practice and is explicitly prohibited because it violates the fundamental principles of justice, honesty, and trust that are advocated by the religion. Third, the practice of votes buying and selling in elections damages the social order by undermining trust in the integrity of the political system, reducing participation in elections, weakening social cohesion, and destabilizing the political stability of Islamic communities. Fourth, the Islamic solution to overcome the votes buying and selling in general elections includes revitalizing Islamic political education, increasing public awareness through campaigns about the dangers of vote buying and selling in elections, educating the public about Islamic values that support honesty and integrity in the political process, providing sharia sanctions for individuals involved in buying and selling votes in elections, as well as enhancing the role of ulama to promote political ethics under Islamic teachings.

Diterbitkan

2024-12-30 — Diperbaharui pada 2025-01-01

Versi

Cara Mengutip

Anisa, L. N. (2025). Votes Buying and Selling in General Elections: An Islamic Perspective. Dialogia, 22(2), 218–241. https://doi.org/10.21154/dialogia.v22i2.8946 (Original work published 30 Desember 2024)