From Structural Analysis of Semiotics QS. Al-'Alaq 1-5 to Basic Structure of Science in Islamic Education

  • Rahayu Subakat UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
  • Sangkot Sirait UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
  • Fakhruddin Faiz UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
  • Mustafa Kamal Nasution IAIN Takengon
Abstract views: 390 , PDF downloads: 315
Keywords: Structural Semiotics al-Quran, Basic Structure of Science, Islamic Education

Abstract

Philosophically, QS. al-'Alaq: 1-5 forms the basic structure of science as the foundation for the development of Islamic education. This study aims to explain the relationship between QS. al-'Alaq: 1-5 with the basic structure of Science and its implications in Islamic education. This study uses secondary data sources, namely the Koran, classic, modern and contemporary. Methods of collecting data with documentation, data analysis using content analysis with stages; descriptive, explanative, discursive, interpretative, and implicative. This study indicates that the basic structure of Science in QS. al-'Alaq: 1-5 includes; epistemology, world view, and ideology. The basic structure of Science in QS. al-'Alaq: 1-5 is the relationship between spirituality awareness, rationality awareness, ethical awareness, scientific awareness, and awareness of social transformation. Thus, practically QS. al-'Alaq: 1-5 can be used as an epistemological basis for the development of Islamic education.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

’Abbās, Ibn. “Tanwīr Al-Maqbās Min Tafsīr Ibn ’Abbās (Near Enlightenment from the Interpretation of Ibn Abbas),” 1992. http://www.archive.org/download/waq4125/4125.pdf.

Abdel Haleem, M. A.S. “The Core of the Qur’an: Sūrat Yā Sīn (Q. 36).” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 15, no. 2 (2013): 65–82.

Abduh, Syaikh Muhammad. Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Karim. Mesir, n.d.

———. Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Karim. Mesir: Maktabah Mishriyyah, n.d.

Abid al-Jabiri, Muhammad. Fahmal Quranul Hakim at Tafsir Al Wadhih Hasba Tartibun Nuzul. Beirut: Darul Baidho, 2008.

Adeel, M. Ashraf. Epistemology of the Quran. Vol. 29, 2019. http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-030-17558-0.

Al-Baidhowi, Muhammad. Tafsir Al-Baidhowi. Beirut, n.d.

Al-Baighowi, Husein Bin Masúd. Maálim At-Tanzil. Riyadh: Dar Thibah, n.d.

Al-Khozin. Tafsir Al-Khozin. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, n.d.

Al-Maraghi, Ahmad Musthofa. Tafsir Al-Maraghi. Mesir: 1946, n.d.

Al-Rozi, Muhammad. Tafsir Alkabir Wa Mafatihul Ghoib. Beirut: Darul Fikr, 1981.

Alam Choudhury, Masudul, and Gabor Korvin. “Sustainability in Knowledge-Centered Socio-Scientific Systems.” International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education 2, no. 3 (2001): 257–266.

Alhassen, Leyla Ozgur. “A Structural Analysis of Sürat Maryam, Verses 1-58.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 18, no. 1 (2016): 92–116.

An-Nasafi, Mahmud. Tafsir An-Nasafi. Beirut: Dar al-Kalim at-Thoyyib, n.d.

Ansari, Zafar Ishaq. “Scientific Exegesis of the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 3, no. 1 (2001): 91–104.

Asy-Syaukani, Muhammad. Fathu Al-Qodir. Beirut: Dar al-Wafa’, n.d.

At-Thobari, Muhammad. Jami Albayan Án Ta’wil Alquran. Kairo: Darul Hajr, 2001.

Aydin, Necati. “Paradigmatic Foundation and Moral Axioms of Ihsan Ethics in Islamic Economics and Business” (2018).

Az-Zamakhsyari, Abi al-Qosim. Tafsir Alkasyaf. Kairo: Darul Ma’rifah, n.d.

Az-Zamakhsyarī, Maḥmud. “Al-Kasyāf,” 2009.

Binti Syathi’, Abdurrahman. At-Tafsir Al-Bayani Li Al-Quran Al-Karim. Kairo: Darul Maárif, 1968.

Choudhury, M. A. “The Epistemologies of Ghazzali, Kant and the Alternative: Formalism in Unification of Knowledge Applied to the Concepts of Markets and Sustainability.” International Journal of Social Economics 24, no. 7–9 (1997): 918–940.

Choudhury, M. “Knowledge-Induced Technological Change: A Study Involving the Automobile Innovation in Malaysia with Layers of Techniques.” International Journal of Social Economics 33, no. 11 (2006): 744–765. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=33748704242&origin=inward.

Choudhury, Masudul Alam. “Religion and Social Economics (a Systemic Theory of Organic Unity).” International Journal of Social Economics 43, no. 2 (2016): 134–160.

Duasa, Jarita, Suhaimi Mhd Sarif, and Nur Arfifah Abdul Sabian. “Unified Theory of Firm: An Empirical Analysis.” Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research 11, no. 7 (2020): 1453–1478.

Eggen, Nora S. “Conceptions of Trust in the Qur’an.” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 13, no. 2 (2011): 56–85.

El-Awa, Salwa M.S. “Textual Relations in the Qur’ān: Relevance, Coherence and Structure.” Textual Relations in the Qur’ān: Relevance, Coherence and Structure (2005): 1–182.

Hasan Jabannakah, Abdurrahman. Maárijut Tafakkur Wa Daqaiqut Tadabbur. Beirut, 2000.

Huda, Miftachul, Ajat Sudrajat, Razaleigh Muhamat, Kamarul Shukri Mat Teh, and Burhanuddin Jalal. “Strengthening Divine Values for Self-Regulation in Religiosity: Insights from Tawakkul (Trust in God).” International Journal of Ethics and Systems 35, no. 3 (2019): 323–344.

Hussein Thaba Thabai, Sayyid Muhammad. Al-Mizan Fi Tafsir Al-Quran. Beirut, 1997.

Ibn ’Abbās. “Tanwīr Al-Maqbās Min Tafsīr Ibn ’Abbās (Near Enlightenment from the Interpretation of Ibn Abbas),” 1992. http://www.archive.org/download/waq4125/4125.pdf.

Ibn Katsir, Imam. Tafsir Al-Quran Al-Adzim. Beirut: Dar Ibn Jawzi, 2010.

Kartanegara, Mulyadhi. Essentials of Islamic Epistemology APhilosophical Inquiry into Foundation of Knowledge. Bandar Sri Begawan: UBD Press, 2014.

Khudhura, S A. “The Concept of Presumption in the Quran Context: Rhetorical Study.” International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change 11, no. 1 (2020): 144–158. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85087287631&origin=inward.

Bin Muhammad, ’Alauddin Ali. Tafsir Al-Khozin. Beirut, n.d.

Muhammad Fazl-Ur-Rahman Ansari. “The Qur’anic Foundations & Structure of Muslim Society” (2008).

Nasser, Sulaiman Abdullah Saif Al, and Datin Dr Joriah Muhammed. “Humanomics Article Information :” Humanomics 29, no. 2 (2013): 80–87.

Netton, Ian Richard. “ Towards a Modern Tafsīr of Sūrat Al-Kahf : Structure and Semiotics .” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 2, no. 1 (2000): 67–87.

Nurasyiah, Aas, Miyasto Miyasto, Tatik Mariyanti, and Irfan Syauqi Beik. “Women’s Empowerment and Family Poverty in the Tawhidi Epistemological Approach.” International Journal of Ethics and Systems 37, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOES-01-2020-0004.

Paret, Rudi, and Toshihiko Izutsu. “Ethico-Religious Concepts in the Qur’an.” Die Welt Des Islams, 1968.

Qutb, Sayyid. Tafsir Fi Zhilalil Qur’an. Kairo, n.d.

Sinai, Nicolai. “ An Interpretation of Sūrat Al-Najm (Q. 53) .” Journal of Qur’anic Studies 13, no. 2 (2011): 1–28.

Uzzah Dzarwazah, Muhammad. Tafsir Alhadis Tartib Assuwar Hasba Al Nuzul. Kairo: Darul Gharb Al Islamy, 1984.

Zuhaili, Wahbah. Tafsir Al-Munir: Al-Aqidah Wa as –Syariah Wa Al-Manhaj. Beirut: Darul Fikr, 2003.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2022-05-24
How to Cite
Subakat, R., Sirait, S., Faiz, F., & Nasution, M. K. (2022). From Structural Analysis of Semiotics QS. Al-’Alaq 1-5 to Basic Structure of Science in Islamic Education. Al-Tahrir: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 22(1), 119-140. https://doi.org/10.21154/altahrir.v22i1.3598