SCIENCE LEARNING DISCOURSE BASED ON CLASSROOM REPRESENTATION PRACTICE TO PROCESS CONCEPT OF MATERIAL PRESSURE
Abstract
References
Arianto, H., & Fauziyah, H. N. (2020). Students’ Response To the Implementation of Case Based Learning (Cbl) Based Hots in Junior High School. INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 1(1), 45. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v1i1.2058
Buty, C., & Mortimer, E. F. (2008). Dialogic/authoritative discourse and modelling in a high school teaching sequence on optics. International Journal of Science Education, 30(12), 1635–1660. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701466280
Eilam, B., & Poyas, Y. (2010). External visual representations in science learning: The case of relations among system components. International Journal of Science Education, 32(17), 2335–2366. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690903503096
Evagorou, M., Erduran, S., & Mäntylä, T. (2015). The role of visual representations in scientific practices: from conceptual understanding and knowledge generation to ‘seeing’ how science works. International Journal of STEM Education, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-015-0024-x
Hamidah, U. N., & Mubarak, F. A. M. (2020). Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal. 1(1), 1–16.
Hilton, A., & Nichols, K. (2011). Representational Classroom Practices that Contribute to Students’ Conceptual and Representational Understanding of Chemical Bonding. International Journal of Science Education, 33(16), 2215–2246. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2010.543438
Kubasko, D., Jones, M. G., Tretter, T., & Andre, T. (2008). Is it live or is it memorex? Students’ synchronous and asynchronous communication with scientists. International Journal of Science Education, 30(4), 495–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690701217220
Lehesvuori, S., Hähkiöniemi, M., Viiri, J., Nieminen, P., Jokiranta, K., & Hiltunen, J. (2019). Teacher orchestration of classroom interaction in science: exploring dialogic and authoritative passages in whole-class discussions. International Journal of Science Education, 41(17), 2557–2578. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2019.1689586
Nurachman, D. E., & Irawan, E. (2020). Effectiveness of Blended Learning Based on Constructive Feedback in Improving Rational Thinking Ability of Students. INSECTA: Integrative Science Education and Teaching Activity Journal, 1(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v1i1.2055
Olander, C., Wickman, P. O., Tytler, R., & Ingerman, Å. (2018). Representations as mediation between purposes as junior secondary science students learn about the human body. International Journal of Science Education, 40(2), 204–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1407464
Prain, V., & Tytler, R. (2012). Learning Through Constructing Representations in Science: A framework of representational construction affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 34(17), 2751–2773. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2011.626462
Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Peneiltian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In Alfabeta Bandung.
Tang, K. S. (2016). The interplay of representations and patterns of classroom discourse in science teaching sequences. International Journal of Science Education, 38(13), 2069–
Copyright (c) 2022 Jihannita; Faninda Novika Pertiwi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.