VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF ISLAMIC AND INDONESIAN-BASED CONTEXTUAL SCIENCE LITERACY ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS
Abstract views: 256
,
PDF downloads: 206
Validity and Reliability of Islamic and Indonesian-based Contextual Science Literacy Assessment Instruments downloads: 0
Abstract
This study aims to determine the validity of the Islamic and Indonesian-based contextual scientific literacy assessment instrument (ALSKII) using the Rasch model. This instrument was developed in the context of Covid-19 as a socio-scientific issue that is presented in a structured manner with a plural model, namely scientific and socio-scientific. The scientific model represents the content of science which is presented in three models, namely mechanistic, systematic, and mathematical. The socio-scientific model is a scientific context that is integrated with religion and nation. This instrument has five skills which are made into 25 question items. The sample of this research is 75 final-semester science education students who were selected purposively. The results showed that the Islamic and Indonesian-based contextual scientific literacy assessment instrument was valid and reliable with a person measure the value of 0.73, MNSQ person and item close to 0.0, person and ZSTD item close to 1.0, Cronbach alpha 0.67, person reliability 0.64 and item reliability 0.95. This instrument can be an alternative in the assessment of scientific literacy based on religion and the state. The instrument can also be further developed according to the context and socio-scientific issues that need to be solved in the community.
References
Ambarwati, D., Nyeneng, I. D. ., & Suana, W. (2016). Pengembangan LKS Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbasis Pendekatan Kontekstual Materi Gaya dan Penerapannya. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 4(2).
Baghaei, P., & Aryadoust, V. (2015). Modeling Local Item Dependence Due to Common Test Format With a Multidimensional Rasch Model. International Journal of Testing, 0, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/15305058.2014.941108
Dauer, J., Mayes, R., Rittschof, K., Gallant, B., Dauer, J., Mayes, R., Rittschof, K., Gallant, B., Dauer, J., Mayes, R., & Rittschof, K. (2021). Assessing quantitative modelling practices , metamodelling , and capability confidence of biology undergraduate students and capability con fi dence of biology undergraduate students. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2021.1928325
Fine, C. G. M. C., & Furtak, E. M. (2020). A framework for science classroom assessment task design for emergent bilingual learners. Science Education, 104(3), 393–420. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21565
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., & Lutz, M. (2012). Developing a Test of Scientific Literacy Skills ( TOSLS ): Measuring Undergraduates ’ Evaluation of Scientific Information and Arguments. 11, 364–377. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.12-03-0026
Herman, B. C., Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2021). Impact of place-based socioscientific issues instruction on students’ contextualization of socioscientific orientations. Science Education, 105(4), 585–627. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21618
Holbrook, J., & Rannikmae, M. (2009). The Meaning of Scientific Literacy. International Journal of Environmental & Science Education, 4(3), 275–288.
Issaev, L. M., & Shishkina, A. R. (2019). The Global Terrorism Narratives: Typology of the Islamic State’s Media Propaganda. Journal of Globalization Studies, 10(2), 113–125. https://www.sociostudies.org/upload/sociostudies.org/journal/jogs/2019_2/009 Issaev, Shishkina FIN.pdf
Kahn, S. (2015). A Conceptual Analysis of Perspective Taking in Support of Socioscientific Reasoning.
Kaldaras, L., Akaeze, H., & Krajcik, J. (2021). Developing and validating Next Generation Science Standards-aligned learning progression to track three-dimensional learning of electrical interactions in high school physical science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(4), 589–618. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21672
Ke, L., Sadler, T. D., Zangori, L., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2021). Developing and Using Multiple Models to Promote Scientific Literacy in the Context of Socio ‑ Scientific Issues. 589–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00206-1
Maia, P., Justi, R., & Santos, M. (2021). Aspects About Science in the Context of Production and Communication of Knowledge of COVID ‑ 19. Science & Education, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00229-8
Mehren, R., Rempfler, A., Buchholz, J., Hartig, J., & Ulrich-Riedhammer, E. M. (2018). System competence modelling: Theoretical foundation and empirical validation of a model involving natural, social and human-environment systems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(5), 685–711. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21436
Millar, B. C., Banks, L., Bourke, T. W., & ... (2018). Meningococcal Disease Section 2: Epidemiology and Vaccination of Meningococcal Disease in Northern Ireland: MeningoNI Forum. In … Medical Journal. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5974662/
Newton, M. H., & Zeidler, D. L. (2020). Developing socioscientific perspective taking. International Journal of Science Education, 42(8), 1302–1319. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1756515
Nida, S., Mustikasari, V. R., & Eilks, I. (2021). Indonesian Pre-Service Science Teachers ’ Views on Socio-Scientific Issues- Based Science Learning. 17(1), 1–11.
OECD. (2014). PISA 2012 Result in Focus: What 15-Year-Olds Know and What They can Do with What They Know 9Student Performance in Mathematics, REading and Science). OECD Publishing.
Osterlind, S. J., & Wang, Z. (2018). Item Response Theory in Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation for Higher Education. In Handbook on Measurement, Assessment, and Evaluation for Higher EducationMeasurement, Assessment, and Evaluation for Higher Education (pp. 150–160).
Paxinou, E., Sgourou, A., Panagiotakopoulos, C., & ... (2017). The item response theory for the assessment of users’ performance in a biology virtual laboratory. In Journal for Open and ….
Puig, B., Blanco-anaya, P., & Pérez-maceira, J. J. (2021). “ Fake News ” or Real Science ? Critical Thinking to Assess Information on COVID-19. 6(March 2020), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.646909
Qayum, A., Arya, R., Kumar, P., & ... (2015). Socio-economic, epidemiological and geographic features based on GIS-integrated mapping to identify malarial hotspots. In … journal. malariajournal.biomedcentral.com. https://malariajournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12936-015-0685-4
Ramdani, R., Hanurawan, F., Ramli, M., Lasan, B. B., & Afdal, A. (2020). Development and Validation of Indonesian Academic Resilience Scale Using Rasch Models. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.29333/IJI.2021.1417A
Rusilowati, A. (2018). ASESMEN LITERASI SAINS : ANALISIS KARAKTERISTIK INSTRUMEN DAN KEMAMPUAN. September.
Rusilowati, A., & Hartono, H. (2017). Pengembangan Alat Evaluasi Literasi Sains untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Bertema Pierpindahan Kalor dalam Kehidupan. Lembaran Ilmu Kependidikan, 46(2), 51–59.
Rusilowati, A., & Linuwih, S. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Asesmen Literasi Sains Tema Energi. Journal of Primary Education, 5(2), 147–154.
Sadhu, S., & Laksono, E. W. (2018). Development and Validation of an Integrated Assessment for Measuring Critical Thinking and Chemical Literacy in Chemical Equilibrium. International Journal of Instruction, 11(3), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2018.11338a
Songer, N. B., & Recalde, G. D. I. (2021). Eco-Solutioning : The Design and Evaluation of a Curricular Unit to Foster Students ’ Creation of Solutions to Address Local Socio-Scienti fi c Issues. 6(March), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.642320
Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2013). Aplikasi Model Rasch Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial. Trim.
Sutter, A. M., Dauer, J. M., Forbes, C. T., & Dauer, J. M. (2018). Application of construal level and value-belief norm theories to undergraduate decision-making on a wildlife socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 0(0), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2018.1467064
Tyrrell, D. C., & Calinger, M. (2021). HHS Public Access. 120–125.
WEForum. (2018). The Global Risks Report 2018 13th Edition.
Zeidler, D. L., & Kahn, S. (2014). It’s Debatable! Using Socioscientific Issues to Develop Scientific Literacy, K-12 (Issue JANUARY). NSTA Press.
Copyright (c) 2023 Fenny Widiyanti; Muslimah Susilayati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
