ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL OF VIRTUAL LAB RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT IN SCIENCE LEARNING WITH THE BIBLIOMETRIC METHOD

Meili Yanti; Dea Santika Rahayu; Haryanti Putri Rizal

doi:10.21154/insecta.v4i1.6010

Meili Yanti Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene, Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia
Dea Santika Rahayu Universitas Tidar, Magelang, Indonesia
Haryanti Putri Rizal Universitas Sulawesi Barat, Majene, Sulawesi Barat, Indonesia

https://doi.org/10.21154/insecta.v4i1.6010

Abstract views: 311 ,

PDF downloads: 386

Keywords: Bibliometric, Science learning, Virtual Lab, VOS Viewers

Abstract

The development of scientific fields is possible through communication between researchers. This communication can be established with a medium called the Scientific Journal. Through the media, each researcher searches for articles that have been researched on the same topic. So that they will easily update or develop the topic. This method is known as the bibliometric analysis method. Therefore this study aims to carry out the same analysis on the virtual lab theme. This is important in learning development, especially in science learning. The data obtained was in the form of many articles from the SCOPUS database, which several criteria had previously defined to capture them. These criteria are related to the year of publication, keywords and language selection. The application used in this study is the VOS Viewers application. The results show that research related to virtual labs in science learning is still very possible considering many limited lab facilities in some schools. However, it should be noted that virtual labs cannot replace traditional laboratories because traditional laboratories can give students hands-on practical experience. It is better if the virtual lab is considered as a supplementary to science learning

References

Aglietti, G. S. (2020). Current Challenges and Opportunities for Space Technologies. Frontiers in Space Technologies, 1(June), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.3389/frspt.2020.00001

Alotaibi, O., & ALQahtani, D. (2016). Measuring dental students’ preference: A comparison of light microscopy and virtual microscopy as teaching tools in oral histology and pathology. Saudi Dental Journal, 28(4), 169–173.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sdentj.2015.11.002

Amorim, T., Tapparo, L., Marranghello, N., Silva, A. C. R., & Pereira, A. S. (2014). A multiple intelligences theory-based 3D virtual lab environment for digital systems teaching. Procedia Computer Science, 29, 1413–1422. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.128

Astuti, N. W., Yolida, B., & Sikumbang, D. (2019). Hubungan Praktikum dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Terhadap Hasil Belajar Materi Ekosistem. Jurnal Bioterdidik, 7(5), 53–65.

chandra, B. R. P., Geevarghese, K. P., & Gangadharan, K. V. (2014). Design and Implementation of Remote Mechatronics Laboratory for e-Learning Using LabVIEW and Smartphone and Cross-platform Communication Toolkit (SCCT). Procedia Technology, 14, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2014.08.015

Church, F. C., Cooper, S. T., Fortenberry, Y. M., Glasscock, L. N., & Hite, R. (2021). Useful teaching strategies in stemm (Science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medicine) education during the covid-19 pandemic. Education Sciences, 11(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11110752

Debela, D. T., Muzazu, S. G., Heraro, K. D., Ndalama, M. T., Mesele, B. W., Haile, D. C., Kitui, S. K., & Manyazewal, T. (2021). New approaches and procedures for cancer treatment: Current perspectives. SAGE Open Medicine, 9, 205031212110343. https://doi.org/10.1177/20503121211034366

Domínguez, J. C., Miranda, R., González, E. J., Oliet, M., & Alonso, M. V. (2018). A virtual lab as a complement to traditional hands-on labs: Characterization of an alkaline electrolyzer for hydrogen production. Education for Chemical Engineers, 23, 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ece.2018.03.002

Dukhanov, A., Karpova, M., & Bochenina, K. (2014). Design virtual learning labs for courses in computational science with use of cloud computing technologies. Procedia Computer Science, 29, 2472–2482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2014.05.231

Fatimah, Z., Rizaldi, D. R., Jufri, A. W., & Jamaluddin, J. (2020). Model Inkuiri Terbimbing Berbantuan Laboratorium Virtual Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Proses Sains. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, Geologi, Dan Geofisika (GeoScienceEd Journal), 1(2). https://doi.org/10.29303/goescienceedu.v1i2.45

Hafifah, G. N., & Sulistyo, G. H. (2020). Teachers’ ICT literacy and ICT integration in ELT in the Indonesian higher education setting. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.17718/TOJDE.762050

Halawa, S., Hsu, Y. S., Zhang, W. X., Kuo, Y. R., & Wu, J. Y. (2020). Features and trends of teaching strategies for scientific practices from a review of 2008–2017 articles. International Journal of Science Education, 42(7), 1183–1206. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1752415

Hasanah, D. N., & Anfa, Q. (2021). Meta Analisis Latar Belakang Berbagai Strategi dan Media Pembelajaran IPA di SMP. Jurnal Tadris IPA Indonesia, 1(3), 413–419. https://doi.org/10.21154/jtii.v1i3.298

Idris, N., Talib, O., & Razali, F. (2022). Strategies in Mastering Science Process Skills in Science Experiments: a Systematic Literature Review. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 11(1), 155–170. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v11i1.32969

Klentien, U., & Wannasawade, W. (2016). Development of Blended Learning Model with Virtual Science Laboratory for Secondary Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 217(2), 706–711. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.02.126

Lv, Z., Li, X., & Li, W. (2017). Virtual reality geographical interactive scene semantics research for immersive geography learning. Neurocomputing, 254, 71–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2016.07.078

Maksum, A. H., & Saragih, Y. (2020). Analisis Penerapan Virtual Laboratorium Versus Reality Laboratorium. Jurnal TIARSIE, 17(2), 47. https://doi.org/10.32816/tiarsie.v17i2.72

Mead, C., Buxner, S., Bruce, G., Taylor, W., Semken, S., & Anbar, A. D. (2019). Immersive, interactive virtual field trips promote science learning. Journal of Geoscience Education, 67(2), 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1080/10899995.2019.1565285

Mormina, M. (2019). Science, Technology and Innovation as Social Goods for Development: Rethinking Research Capacity Building from Sen’s Capabilities Approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 25(3), 671–692. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0037-1

Muspa, R. M., & Suwondo, N. (2020). Pengembangan Perangkat Praktikum Penentuan Percepatan Gravitasi Bumi Menggunakan Pegas Berbasis Arduino-Linx-Labview. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 11(2), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v11i2.6155

Mutanaffisah, R., Ningrum, R., & Widodo, A. (2021). Ketepatan pemilihan pendekatan , metode , dan media terhadap karakteristik materi IPA The accuracy of the selection of approaches , methods , and media for the characteristics of combined science materials. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 7(1), 12–21.

Orduña, P., Bailey, P. H., Delong, K., López-De-Ipiña, D., & García-Zubia, J. (2014). Towards federated interoperable bridges for sharing educational remote laboratories. Computers in Human Behavior, 30, 389–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.029

Raghupathi, V., & Raghupathi, W. (2019). Exploring science-and-technology-led innovation : a cross-country study. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 8(5), 1–45.

Rahayu, C., & Eliyarti, E. (2019). Deskripsi Efektivitas Kegiatan Praktikum Dalam Perkuliahan Kimia Dasar Mahasiswa Teknik. Edu Sains Jurnal Pendidikan Sains & Matematika, 7(2), 51–60. https://doi.org/10.23971/eds.v7i2.1476

Rohandi. (2019). Teaching and Learning Science: Student’s Perspective. International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching, 3(1), 128–136.

Rohim, F. (2020). Need Analysis of Virtual Laboratories For Science Education In Jambi, Indonesia. Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora, 4(2), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.22437/jssh.v4i2.11539

Saeful Bahri, Husnibes Muchtar, & Erwin Dermawan. (2014). Prototipe Sistem Kendali Pid Dan Monitoring Temperatur Berbasis Labview. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Teknologi , November, 1–5.

Shana, Z., & Abulibdeh, E. S. (2020). Science Pratical Work and Its Impact on Students Science Achievement. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 10(2), 199–215.

https://doi.org/10.3926/JOTSE.888

Sus, B., Revenchuk, I., Bauzha, O., & Zagorodnyuk, S. (2021). Virtual laboratory as custom e-learning implementation and design solution. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2833, 177–187.

Syahfitri, F. D., Manurung, B., & Sudibyo, M. (2019). The Development of Problem Based Virtual Laboratory Media to Improve Science Process Skills of Students in Biology. International Journal of Research and Review, 6(6), 64–74.

Tanti, Kurniawan, D. A., Kuswanto, Utami, W., & Wardhana, I. (2020). Science process skills and critical thinking in science: Urban and rural disparity. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 9(4), 489–498. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v9i4.24139

Trott, C. D., & Weinberg, A. E. (2020). Science Education for Sustainability: Strengthening Children’s Science Engagement through Climate Change Learning and Action. Sustainability, 12(16), 6400. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12166400

Voitle, F., Heuckmann, B., Kampa, N., & Kremer, K. (2022). Assessing students’ epistemic beliefs related to professional and school science. International Journal of Science Education, 44(6), 1000–1020. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2022.2059821

Wang, J., Guo, D., & Jou, M. (2015). A study on the effects of model-based inquiry pedagogy on students’ inquiry skills in a virtual physics lab. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 658–669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.043

ANALYSIS OF THE POTENTIAL OF VIRTUAL LAB RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT IN SCIENCE LEARNING WITH THE BIBLIOMETRIC METHOD

Abstract

References

PlumX Metrics