Muslim Post-Graduate Students’ Self-Leadership Skills and Productivity during Remote Teaching and Learning

  • Abdul Shakour Duncan Preece International Islamic University Malaysia
  • Popoola Kareem Hamed Al-Madinah International University, Malaysia
Abstract views: 128 , PDF downloads: 117
Keywords: self-leadership, higher education institutions, productivity

Abstract

The study aims to investigate the impact of self-leadership on Muslim postgraduate students’ achievement or productivity during remote teaching and learning in Malaysian higher education institutions. The research instrument was a Likert questionnaire that measured the dimensions of self-leadership and productivity. The study employed principal component analysis (PCA) and path analysis using AMOS. The findings supported self-leadership as a multidimensional construct with five underlying dimensions comprising self-determined goals, self-reward, self-punishment, self–observation and self-cueing. Several latent variables further supported each dimension. In addition, the results showed that the dimensions of self-leadership and productivity are psychometrically sound regarding divergent and convergent validity. The average variance explained for each variable was (> .05), and the values for composite reliability of the constructs ranged from (.887 and .910). Furthermore, the study found that the dimensions of self-leadership, i.e. self-goal, self-reward, self-punishment, self–observation and self-cueing, positively predicted Muslim students’ productivity during remote teaching and learning, with a p-value of less than 0.00. The study recommends promoting self-leadership strategies to enhance students’ productivity and, in turn, their overall educational performance.

Author Biography

Abdul Shakour Duncan Preece, International Islamic University Malaysia
Department of Curriculum and Instruction

References

Field, Andy. Discovering Statistics Using IBM SPSS Statistics. California: Sage Publications, 2013.

Grint, Keith, dan Owain Smolovic. “What is Leadership: Person, Result, Position or Process, or All or None of These?” Dalam The Routledge Companion to Leadership, 25–42. Routledge, 2016.

Hodges, Charles B., Stephanie Moore, Barbara B. Lockee, Torrey Trust, dan Mark Aaron Bond. “The Difference Between Emergency Remote Teaching and Online Learning.” Virginia Tech, 2020, 5.

Jooste, Karien, dan Jose Frantz. “Self-Leadership Traits of Academics to Conform to a Changing Higher Education Environment.” African Journal of Health Professions Education 9, no. 4 (2017): 199–202.

Kalargyrou, Valentini, Anthony T. Pescosolido, dan Emmanuel A. Kalargiros. “Leadership Skills in Management Education.” Academy of Educational Leadership Journal 16, no. 4 (2012): 39.

Kivinen, Sonja, Jon Moen, Anna Berg, dan Åsa Eriksson. “Effects of Modern Forest Management on Winter Grazing Resources for Reindeer in Sweden.” Ambio 39 (2010): 269–78.

Leithwood, Kenneth, dan Karen Seashore-Louis. Linking Leadership to Student Learning. John Wiley & Sons, 2011.

Louis, Louis, Karen Seashore, Kenneth Leithwood, Kyla L. Wahlstrom, Stephen E. Anderson, Michael Michlin, dan Blair Mascall. “Learning from Leadership: Investigating the Links to Improved Student Learning.” Wallace Foundation 42 (2010): 65–73.

Lovelace, Sherri, dan Sharon R. Stewart. “Increasing Print Awareness in Preschoolers with Language Impairment Using Non-Evocative Print Referencing.” Journal of Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools (LSHSS) 38, no. 1 (2007): 16–30.

Manz, Charles C., Jeffery D. Houghton, Christopher P. Neck, Mel Fugate, dan Craig Pearce. “Whistle While You Work: Toward a Model of Emotional Self-Leadership.” Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies 23, no. 4 (2016): 374–86.

Nadhif, Ahmad, dan Indah Rohmatika. “The Role of Self-Regulated Learning on Students’ English Achievement.” Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan 18, no. 2 (2020): 249–66.

Neck, Christopher P., dan Jeffery D. Houghton. “Two Decades of Self-Leadership Theory and Research: Past Developments, Present Trends, and Future Possibilities.” Journal of Managerial Psychology 21, no. 4 (2006): 270–95.

Pallant, Julie F., Helen M. Haines, Ingegerd Hildingsson, Maddalena Cross, dan Christine Rubertsson. “Psychometric Evaluation and Refinement of the Prenatal Attachment Inventory.” Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology 32, no. 2 (2014): 112–25.

Rossi Ferrario, Silvia, Anna Panzeri, Pasquale Anselmi, dan Giulio Vidotto. “Development and Psychometric Properties of a Short Form of the Illness Denial Questionnaire.” Psychology Research and Behavior Management, 2019, 727–39.

Susanto, Susanto. “The Challenge of the Integrated Character Education Paradigm With 21st-Century Skills During the Covid-19 Pandemic.” Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan 20, no. 1 (2022): 82–87.

Taherdoost, Hamed. “Determining Sample Size: How to Calculate Survey Sample Size.” International Journal of Economics and Management Systems 2 (2017): 237–39.

Tracy, Jessica L., dan Richard W. Robins. “Putting the Self into Self-Conscious Emotions: A Theoretical Model.” Psychological Inquiry 15, no. 2 (2004): 103–25.

Wiek, Arnim, Lauren Withycombe, dan Charles L. Redman. “Key Competencies in Sustainability: A Reference Framework for Academic Program Development.” Sustainability Science 6 (2011): 203–18.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-06-27
Section
Articles