The Perceived Utility and University Enrolment Intention in Indonesia: Students Perspective

  • Ahmad Juhaidi Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Hidayat Ma'ruf Universitas Islam Negeri Antasari, Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Anas Tajudin University College MAIWP International Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • Salafuddin Fitri Ministry of Religious Affairs Office Banjarmasin, Indonesia
  • Hamdani Hamdani Madrasah Aliyah Negeri (MAN) 3 Banjarmasin, Indonesia
https://doi.org/10.21154/cendekia.v21i2.7364
Abstract views: 470 , PDF downloads: 167
Keywords: cost, economic benefit, non-economic benefit, probability of success, utility

Abstract

This study investigates the difference between the utility of general higher education (GHE) and Islamic higher education (IHE), students' enrolment intention, and their correlation. Data were collected using questionnaires. The participants of this study were 753 students in South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Researchers used convenience and snowballing sampling techniques. Data analysis used the Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test and Spearman's correlation. This study proves that the level of utility and all its factors (economic and non-economic benefit, probability of success, and cost) differ significantly between GHE and IHE (Sig<0.05). Moreover, it was found that all factors correlate with enrolment intention (Sig<0.05). However, correlation coefficients indicate that the cost of GHE and IHE  is the factor with the weakest correlation (p=0,139 and p=0.084) with enrolment intention. The strongest correlation with enrolment intention is the utility of GHE and IHE (p=0,597 and p=0.579) and the possibility of success in GHE and IHE(p=0,614 and p=0.530). This study offers practical recommendations for higher education institutions and suggests future research.

References

Abdullah, Muhammad Amin. “Islamic Studies in Higher Education in Indonesia: Challenges, Impact and Prospects for the World Community.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 55, no. 2 (December 15, 2017): 391–426.

Adefulu, Adesoga, Temitope Farinloye, and Emmanuel Mogaji. “Factors Influencing Postgraduate Students’ University Choice in Nigeria.” In Higher Education Marketing in Africa, edited by Emmanuel Mogaji, Felix Maringe, and Robert Ebo Hinson, 187–225. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020.

Al-Shalabi, Luai. “A Data Mining Model for Students’ Choice of College Major Based on Rough Set Theory.” Journal of Computer Science 15, no. 8 (2019): 1150–60.

Anderson, Peter. “Factors Influencing Student Choice in Higher Education.” Perspectives: Policy & Practice in Higher Education 3, no. 4 (1999): 128–31.

Azzone, Giovanni, and Mara Soncin. “Factors Driving University Choice: A Principal Component Analysis on Italian Institutions.” Studies in Higher Education 45, no. 12 (2020): 2426–38.

Belmonte, Zachariah John A., Yogi Tri Prasetyo, Ardvin Kester S. Ong, Thanatorn Chuenyindee, Nattakit Yuduang, Poonyawat Kusonwattana, Reny Nadlifatin, Satria Fadil Persada, and Thapanat Buaphiban. “How Important Is the Tuition Fee during the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Developing Country? Evaluation of Filipinos’ Preferences on Public University Attributes Using Conjoint Analysis.” Heliyon 8, no. 11 (November 1, 2022): e11205.

Bietenbeck, Jan, Andreas Leibing, Jan Marcus, and Felix Weinhardt. “Tuition Fees and Educational Attainment.” European Economic Review 154 (May 2023): 104431.

Bong, Mimi. “Role of Self-Efficacy and Task-Value in Predicting College Students’ Course Performance and Future Enrollment Intentions.” Contemporary Educational Psychology 26, no. 4 (October 2001): 553–70.

Bosnjak, Michael, Icek Ajzen, and Peter Schmidt. “The Theory of Planned Behavior: Selected Recent Advances and Applications.” Europe’s Journal of Psychology 16, no. 3 (August 31, 2020): 352–56.

Brand, Jennie E., and Yu Xie. “Who Benefits Most from College?: Evidence for Negative Selection in Heterogeneous Economic Returns to Higher Education.” American Sociological Review 75, no. 2 (April 2010): 273–302.

Chen, Yu-Fen, and Chin-Hui Hsiao. “Applying Market Segmentation Theory to Student Behavior in Selecting a School or Department.” New Horizons in Education 57, no. 2 (October 1, 2009): 32–43.

Chetioui, Youssef, Hikma Benlafqih, and Hind Lebdaoui. “How Fashion Influencers Contribute to Consumers’ Purchase Intention.” Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management: An International Journal 24, no. 3 (April 17, 2020): 361–80.

Cristancho, Gerson J., Yezid A. Cancino, Jairo J. Palacios, and César I. Manjarrez. “Brand Positioning as a Factor in the Choice of the Candidate for Higher Education.” Revista Espacios 40, no. 41 (2019).

Daniel, Annabell, and Rainer Watermann. “The Role of Perceived Benefits, Costs, and Probability of Success in Students’ Plans for Higher Education. A Quasi-Experimental Test of Rational Choice Theory.” European Sociological Review 34, no. 5 (October 1, 2018): 539–53.

Erikson, Robert, and Jan O. Jonsson. “Explainning Class Ineequality in Education; The Swedish Test Case.” In Can Education Be Equalized? The Swedish Case in Comparative Perspective. Colorado: Westview Press, 1996.

Herbaut, Estelle, and Koen Geven. “What Works to Reduce Inequalities in Higher Education? A Systematic Review of the (Quasi-)Experimental Literature on Outreach and Financial Aid.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 65 (February 2020): 100442.

Hinkle, Dennis E., William Wiersma, and Stephen G. Jurs. Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences. 5th ed. Vol. 663. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2003.

Ho, Grace K. S., and Rob Law,. “Marketing Strategies in the Decision-Making Process for Undergraduate Choice in Pursuit of Hospitality and Tourism Higher Education: The Case of Hong Kong.” Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Education 34, no. 2 (April 3, 2022): 124–36.

Hung, Fan-Sing, Yue-Ping Chung, and Esther Sui-Chu Ho. “To Work or to Continue to Higher Education? The Choice of Senior Secondary Students in Shenzhen, China.” Higher Education 39, no. 4 (2000): 455–67.

Iqbal, Asim, Shafiqul Hassan, Haider Mahmood, and Muhammad Tanveer. “Gender Equality, Education, Economic Growth and Religious Tensions Nexus in Developing Countries: A Spatial Analysis Approach.” Heliyon 8, no. 11 (November 1, 2022): e11394.

Kasman, Adi, M. Ikhwan, and Darlis Aziz. “Islamic Education as a Strengthening of Aqidah and Akhlaq in The Society 5.0 Era.” Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan 20, no. 2 (December 1, 2022): 181–89.

Kayombo, Kelvin Mukolo, and Steve Carter. “Understanding Student Preference for University Choice in Zambia.” Journal of Education Policy, Planning & Administration 6, no. 3 (2019): 1–21.

Khoi, B., and D. Cuong. “Empirical Study on the University Choice in Vietnam.” Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems 11 (2019): 1410–17.

Krejcie, Robert V., and Daryle W. Morgan. “Determining Sample Size for Research Activities.” Educational and Psychological Measurement 30, no. 3 (September 1970): 607–10.

Latief, Hilman. “The Masyumi Networks and the Proliferation of Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia (1945–1965).” Bijdragen Tot de Taal-, Land- En Volkenkunde / Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia 178, no. 4 (November 10, 2022): 477–502.

Le, Tri D., Nhi V. Le, Tan T. Nguyen, Khoa T. Tran, and Huong Q. Hoang. “Choice Factors When Vietnamese High School Students Consider Universities: A Mixed Method Approach.” Education Sciences 12, no. 11 (November 2, 2022): 779.

Leighton, Kim, Suzan Kardong-Edgren, Tonya Schneidereith, and Colette Foisy-Doll. “Using Social Media and Snowball Sampling as an Alternative Recruitment Strategy for Research.” Clinical Simulation in Nursing 55 (June 2021): 37–42.

Liu, Shuiyun, Wenyan Liang, and Ying Zhang. “Brighter or the Richer? Understanding Chinese College Students’ Choices to Study Abroad.” International Journal of Educational Development 102 (October 1, 2023): 102856.

Miniard, Paul W., Carl Obermiller, and Thomas J. Page. “A Further Assessment of Measurement Influences on the Intention-Behavior Relationship.” Journal of Marketing Research 20, no. 2 (May 1983): 206.

Mitić, Sanja, and Dušan Mojić. “Student Choice of Higher Education Institutions in a Post-Transitional Country: Evidence from Serbia.” Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 33, no. 1 (January 1, 2020): 3509–27.

Murphy, Richard, Judith Scott-Clayton, and Gill Wyness. “The End of Free College in England: Implications for Enrolments, Equity, and Quality.” Economics of Education Review 71 (August 2019): 7–22.

Nagy, Gabriel, Ulrich Trautwein, Jürgen Baumert, Olaf Köller, and Jessica Garrett. “Gender and Course Selection in Upper Secondary Education: Effects of Academic Self-Concept and Intrinsic Value.” Educational Research and Evaluation 12, no. 4 (August 2006): 323–45.

Nurjaman, Ujang, Muhammad Al Mighwar, Makmur Harun, U. Abdullah Mu’min, and Akmad Najibul Khairi Syaie. “Quality Assurance Islamic Perspective: An Alternative in Islamic-Based Public Education Institutions.” Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan 1, no. 1 (June 18, 2022): 105–30.

Ortiz-Gervasi, Luis. “Social Origin and Expectation of Postgraduate Enrolment among Spanish University Undergraduates Mediation and Moderation Effect of Fields of Study and Grades.” Research in Social Stratification and Mobility 87 (October 1, 2023): 100841.

Parker, Charlie, Sam Scott, and Alistair Geddes. “Snowball Sampling.” In Sage Research Methods Foundations, edited by Paul Atkinson, Sara Delamont, Alexandru Cernat, Joseph W Sakshaug, and Richard A. Williams. London: SAGE Publications Ltd, 2019.

Presidential Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia on the Establishment of the State Islamic Institute, Pub. L. No. 11 (1960).

Rohman, Miftahur, Sulthan Syahril, and Dini Fauziyati. “Masa Depan Studi Islam Di Pendidikan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam (Sebuah Tinjauan Filosofis-Yuridis).” Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan Dan Kemasyarakatan 16, no. 2 (November 22, 2018): 283.

Roksa, Josipa, and Peter Kinsley. “The Role of Family Support in Facilitating Academic Success of Low-Income Students.” Research in Higher Education 60, no. 4 (June 2019): 415–36.

Safitri, Lis, Fadlil Munawwar Manshur, and Husni Thoyyar. “Nurcholish Madjid on Indonesian Islamic Education: A Hermeneutical Study.” Jurnal Ilmiah Islam Futura 22, no. 2 (August 4, 2022): 244–59.

Sannikova, Aija, Velga Vevere, Tamara Grizane, and Liga Jankova. “Economic Factors in the Choice of Studies and Work.” In Economic Science for Rural Development Conference Proceedings, 2019.

Sarkodie, Noble Amoako, Akoto Asare, and Dufie Asare. “Factors Influencing Students’ Choice of Tertiary Education.” ADRRI Journal (Multidisciplinary) 28, no. 11 (5) (2020): 58–92.

Shafiq, M. Najeeb, Robert K. Toutkoushian, and Alexandria Valerio. “Who Benefits from Higher Education in Low- and Middle-Income Countries?” The Journal of Development Studies 55, no. 11 (November 2, 2019): 2403–23.

Shi, Ying. “The Puzzle of Missing Female Engineers: Academic Preparation, Ability Beliefs, and Preferences.” Economics of Education Review 64 (June 2018): 129–43.

Shiner, Michael, and Philip Noden. “‘Why Are You Applying There?’: ‘Race’, Class and the Construction of Higher Education ‘Choice’ in the United Kingdom.” British Journal of Sociology of Education 36, no. 8 (November 17, 2015): 1170–91.

Shnarbekova, Meruert K. “The Effects of Family Capital on Kazakh Youth Strategies in the Choice of Higher Education.” Integration of Education, no. 4 (December 28, 2018): 712–27.

Sianou‐Kyrgiou, Eleni, and Iakovos Tsiplakides. “Similar Performance, but Different Choices: Social Class and Higher Education Choice in Greece.” Studies in Higher Education 36, no. 1 (February 2011): 89–102.

Simões, Cláudia, and Ana Maria Soares. “Applying to Higher Education: Information Sources and Choice Factors.” Studies in Higher Education 35, no. 4 (June 1, 2010): 371–89.

Srivastava, Khusboo, and Somesh Dhamija. “Social Factors Impacting Student’s Choice of Institution for Higher Studies in India.” International Journal of Educational Management 36, no. 7 (November 7, 2022): 1221–37.

Sultan, Khurram, Saja Akram, Sara Abdulhaliq, Deema Jamal, and Rezan Saleem. “A Strategic Approach to the Consumer Perception of Brand on the Basis of Brand Awareness and Brand Loyalty.” International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) 8, no. 3 (May 10, 2019): 33–44.

Suyadi, Zalik Nuryana, Sutrisno, and Baidi. “Academic Reform and Sustainability of Islamic Higher Education in Indonesia.” International Journal of Educational Development 89 (March 2022): 102534.

Syah, M. Noor Sulaiman. “English Education for Islamic University in Indonesia: Status and Challenge.” QIJIS (Qudus International Journal of Islamic Studies) 3, no. 2 (2015): 168–91.

Tandrayen-Ragoobur, Verena, and Deepa Gokulsing. “Gender Gap in STEM Education and Career Choices: What Matters?” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education 14, no. 3 (May 31, 2022): 1021–40.

Ürer Erdil, Damla, Mustafa Tümer, Halil Nadiri, and Iman Aghaei. “Prioritizing Information Sources and Requirements in Students’ Choice of Higher Education Destination: Using AHP Analysis.” SAGE Open 11, no. 2 (April 2021): 215824402110156.

Vulperhorst, Jonne Pieter, Roeland Matthijs van der Rijst, and Sanne Floor Akkerman. “Dynamics in Higher Education Choice: Weighing One’s Multiple Interests in Light of Available Programmes.” Higher Education 79, no. 6 (June 1, 2020): 1001–21.

Zhang, Han, Dandan Zhang, and Yanming Jin. “Does Expansion of College Education Benefit Urban Entrepreneurship and Innovation in China?” Heliyon 9, no. 11 (November 1, 2023): e21813.

PlumX Metrics

Published
2023-11-30
Issue
Vol. 21 No. 2 (2023)
Section
Articles

Copyright (c) 2023 Ahmad Juhaidi, Hidayat Ma'ruf, Salafuddin Fitri, Hamdani Hamdani, Dewi Sarastuti

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright & License

Please find the rights and licenses in Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan. By submitting the article/manuscript, the author(s) agree with this policy. No specific document sign-off is required.

1. License

The non-commercial use of the article will be governed by the Creative Commons Attribution license as currently displayed on the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. 

2. Author(s)' Warranties

The author warrants that the article is original, written by the stated author(s), has not been published before, contains no unlawful statements, does not infringe the rights of others, is subject to copyright that is vested exclusively in the author and free of any third party rights, and that any necessary written permissions to quote from other sources have been obtained by the author(s).

3. User/Public Rights

The spirit of Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan is to disseminate articles published as free as possible. Under the Creative Commons license, Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan permits users to copy, distribute, display, and perform the work for non-commercial purposes. Users will also need to attribute authors and Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan on distributing works in the journal and other media of publications. Unless otherwise stated, the authors are public entities as soon as their articles got published. 

4. Rights of Authors

Authors retain all their rights to the published works, such as (but not limited to) the following rights;

  • Copyright and other proprietary rights relating to the article, such as patent rights,
  • The right to use the substance of the article in own future works, including lectures and books,
  • The right to reproduce the article for own purposes,
  • The right to self-archive the article,
  • The right to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the article's published version (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal (Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan).

5. Co-Authorship

If the article was jointly prepared by more than one author, any author submitting the manuscript warrants that he/she has been authorized by all co-authors to be agreed on this copyright and license notice (agreement) on their behalf and agrees to inform his/her co-authors of the terms of this policy. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan will not be held liable for anything arising due to the author(s) internal dispute. Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan will only communicate with the corresponding author.

6. Royalties

Being an open accessed journal and disseminating articles for free under the Creative Commons license term mentioned, the author(s) are aware that Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan entitles the author(s) to no royalties or other fees. 

7. Miscellaneous

Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan will publish the article (or have it published) in the journal if the article's editorial process is completed. The editors of Cendekia: Jurnal Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan may modify the paper to a style of punctuation, spelling, capitalization, referencing, and usage that deems appropriate. The author acknowledges that the article may be published so that it will be publicly accessible, and such access will be free of charge for the readers, as mentioned in point 3.