Legislasi Mahkamah Konstitusi dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor: 46/PUU-VIII/2010 di Tinjau dari Teori Hukum Hans Kelsen Tentang Konstitusi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v11i2.103Abstract
The legacy of the authority of the Constitutional Court (abbreviated as MK) is as follows: (1) to examine laws against the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; (2) to decide disputes over the authority of State institutions whose authority is granted by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia; (3) to decide on the dissolution of political parties; and (4) to decide disputes over the results of general elections. From the Constitutional Court's legislation, the author is interested in seeing the extent of the Constitutional Court's legislation in making a decision based on the legal theory put forward by Hans Kelsen, regarding the constitution. Kelsen's thinking encouraged the establishment of an institution called Verfassungsgerichtshoft or MK (Constitutional Court) which stands alone outside the Supreme Court, often called The Kelsenian Model. The Constitutional Court decision No. 46/PUU-VIII/2010 is a legal product issued by the Constitutional Court. From the decision, it will be analyzed with regard to the legal basis and legal considerations used by the Constitutional Court in deciding cases that are in accordance with the legal theory put forward by Hans Kelsen in his constitutional theory or not and about the legislation of the Constitutional Court in making the decision based on Hans Kelsan's legal theory.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Subroto Subroto

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.