Filosofi Masalah Khilafiyah
Ikhtilaf al-Fuqaha' dalam Perpektif Filsafat Sosial
Keywords:
social philosophy; differences of opinion; Islamic lawAbstract
This study aims to analyze the philosophy of difference of opinion (ikhtilaf) among fiqh scholars (fuqaha) in the perspective of social philosophy. Ikhtilaf in Islamic law is often seen as a source of division, even though it has a positive value in the social and intellectual dynamics of Muslims. This study uses a qualitative method with a descriptive-analytical approach, through a literature review of classical and contemporary works that discuss the ikhtilaf al-fuqaha'. The results show that differences of opinion in fiqh are a necessity that arises from differences in methodology, social context, and understanding of sharia texts. In the perspective of social philosophy, ikhtilaf contributes to enriching Islamic discourse and reflects the principle of plurality in Islamic legal thought. Thus, understanding ikhtilaf as intellectual wealth can strengthen tolerance and harmony in Muslim societies.
References
.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.