Problem Pengembangan Kreativitas Hakim di Tengah Intervensi Kekuasaan dan Mafia Peradilan

Bercermin dari Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum Roscoe Pound

Authors

  • Ahmad Syafi'i SJ INSURI Ponorogo

Keywords:

Judicial creativity; philosophy of law; judicial independence.

Abstract

This study aims to examine the problems of developing the creativity of judges in dealing with the intervention of power and judicial mafias, with reference to Roscoe Pound's philosophy of law. This study uses a qualitative method with a normative legal philosophy approach, through literature analysis and relevant case studies. The results show that in Roscoe Pound's perspective, law is a tool of social engineering that requires judges to be creative in interpreting the law for substantive justice. However, the reality in Indonesia shows that the creativity of judges is often hampered by external pressures, both from political power and judicial mafia practices. This study emphasizes the need for reform of the judicial system and the protection of the independence of judges so that their strategic role as agents of legal change can develop optimally.

References

.

Published

2009-06-20

How to Cite

Syafi’i SJ, A. (2009). Problem Pengembangan Kreativitas Hakim di Tengah Intervensi Kekuasaan dan Mafia Peradilan: Bercermin dari Pemikiran Filsafat Hukum Roscoe Pound. Justicia Islamica, 6(1), 1–44. Retrieved from https://jurnal.iainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/justicia/article/view/10705

Issue

Vol. 6 No. 1 (2009)

Section

Articles

License

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Requirements to be met by the author as follows:

  1. Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.

  2. Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.

  3. Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).

Lisensi Creative Commons

This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.