Orthodoxy and Heresy in the Thought of Nūr al-Dīn al-Rānīrī

Shaṭaḥāt, Takfīr, and the Boundaries of Shariah

Authors

  • Arfan Arfan UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • As'ad As'ad UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Edi Kurniawan UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Massuhartono Massuhartono UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Ghina Nabilah Efendi UIN Sulthan Thaha Saifuddin Jambi
  • Mukhlas Nugraha IAI Muhammad Azim Jambi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v22i2.10808

Keywords:

al-Fatḥ al-Mubīn ʻalā al-Mulḥidīn, al-Rānīrī, Shaṭahat, Infidelity, the Boundaries of Shariah.

Abstract

The theological debate in Aceh in the 17th century, particularly the accusations of heresy and infidelity directed by Nūr al-Dīn al-Rānīrī against the Wujudiyah group, reflected the tension between shariah, sufism, and creed. This issue is relevant to revisit because it is not only an essential part of the intellectual history of Islam in the archipelago, but also has strong resonance in contemporary takfīr discourse that impacts the religious practices and socio-legal order of Muslims. This study aims to analyse al-Rānīrī's accusations through the parameters of shariah, particularly in relation to shaṭaḥāt (ecstatic expressions), while also examining its significance in modern debates regarding the limits of faith and the practice of excommunication. Using a literature review method and al-Fatḥ al-Mubīn as the primary source, this study found that al-Rānīrī's verdict was based on the assumption that Wujudiyah rejected the obligations of prayer and fasting. However, a textual analysis of Hamzah Fansuri's thought showed that what is meant was only the condition of Sufis in a state of unconsciousness, which in fiqh is considered a matter of khilafiah (disagreement). Therefore, the accusations of bid'ah and kufr do not have sufficient legal legitimacy. This finding confirms that the discourse of takfīr is not only a historical problem, but also has significant socio-legal implications in contemporary times, both through institutional fatwas and the narratives of transnational groups that have the potential to give rise to stigmatisation and social conflict.

References

Abdul Jalil, Mohd Noh bin. “Al-Raniri’s Perceptions of Other Religions in His Book Tibyan Fi Ma’rifah al-Adyan.” International Islamic University Malaysia, 2002.

Aini, Zulkefli, and Che Zarrina Sa’ari. “Usaha Dakwah Nur Al-Din al-Raniri Menentang Kesesatan Kaum Wujudiyyah Dalam Kitab Maa al-Hayah Li Ahl al-Mamat.” Afkar: Jurnal Akidah & Pemikiran Islam 15, no. 1 (2014): 69–114.

Al-Anṣārī, Zakariyyā. Al-Fatḥ al-Wahhāb Bi Sharḥ Manhaj al-Ṭullāb. Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, 1998.

Al-Attas, Muhammad Naguib. A Commentary on the Hujjat Al-Siddiq of Nur al-Din al Raniri. Ministry of Culture, Youth and Sports, 1986.

Al-Attas, Muhammad Naguib. Comments on the Re-Examination of al-Raniri’s Hujjatu’l-Siddiq: A Refutation. Muzium Negara, 1975.

Al-Attas, Muhammad Naguib. “Raniti and the Wujudiyyah of 17th Century Acheh.” McGill University, 1962.

Al-Bakrī, Muḥammad ‘Alī ‘Allān. Al-Fatḥ al-Mubīn Bi Sharḥ Umm al-Barāhīn. Dār al-Ḍiyā’, 2022.

Al-Bukhārī, Abū ‘Abd Allāh Muḥammad ibn Ismāʻil. Ṣaḥīḥ Al-Bukhārī. Edited by Muṣtafā Dīb Al-Bughā. Dār Ibn Kathīr, 1993.

Al-Dimyāṭī, Abū Bakr. Iʻānat Al-Ṭālibīn. Dār al-Fikr li al-Ṭibāʻah wa al-Nashr wa al-Tawzīʻ, 1997.

Al-Ḥallāj, Abū Manṣūr. Dīwān Al-Ḥallāj. Edited by Muḥammad Bāsil ‘Uyūn Al-Sūd. Markaz Taḥqīqāt Kampyutaris ‘Ulūm Islāmī, n.d.

Al-Haytamī, Ibn Ḥajar. Al-Fatḥ al-Mubīn Bi Sharḥ al-Arbaʻīn. Dār al-Minhāj, 2009.

Al-Haytamī, Ibn Hajar. Al-Minhāj al-Qawīm Sharḥ al-Muqaddimah al-Ḥaḍramiyyah. Dār al-Kutub al-ʻIlmiyyah, 2000.

Al-Ibrahim, Bader. “ISIS, Wahhabism and Takfir.” Contemporary Arab Affairs 8, no. 3 (2015): 408–15.

Al-Malībārī, Aḥmad Zayn al-Dīn. Fatḥ Al-Muʻīn Bi Sharḥ Qurrat al-ʻAyn. Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 1974.

Al-Maṣriyyah, Dār al-Iftā’. “Ḥukm Qaḍā’ al-Mughmā ‘Alayh al-Ṣalāh Allatī Fātathu Waqt al-Ighmā.’” Fatwa No. 5834, 2021. https://www.dar-alifta.org/ar/fatawa/17414/حكم-قضاء-المغمى-عليه-الصلاة-التي-فاتته-وقت-الاغماء.

Al-Nawawī. Al-Majmūʻ Sharḥ al-Muhadhdhab. Idārat al-Ṭibāʻah al-Munīrah, 1928.

Alnizar, Fariz. “The Language of Exclusion: Ideology and Power in the Fatwa of the Majelis Ulama Indonesia on Ahmadiyah.” Journal of Islamic Law 6, no. 1 (2025): 67–88.

Alnizar, Fariz, Fadlil Munawwar Manshur, and Amir Ma’ruf. “Following the Global Rejection: The Motives of Majelis Ulama Indonesia’s Fatwas on Ahmadiyah.” Studia Islamika 29, no. 3 (2022): 519–46.

Al-Randī, Ibn ‘Ibad al-Nafazī. Sharḥ Al-Ḥikam. Dār Ihyā’ al-Kutub al-‘Arabiyyah, n.d.

Al-Rānīrī, Nūr al-Dīn. Al-Faṭh al-Mubīn ‘alā al-Mulḥidīn. Yayasan Ali Hasjmi no. 179/TS/4/YPAH/2005, 1068.

Al-Ṭabbākh, Muḥammad Rāghib. Al-Fatḥ al-Mubīn ‘alā Kitāb Nūr al-Yaqīn. Wizārat al-Awqāf wa al-Shu’ūn al-Islāmiyyah, 2019.

Al-Ṭabrānī, Abū al-Qāsim. Al-Muʻjam al-Kabīr. Edited by Ḥamdī ibn ʻAbd al-Majīd Al-Salafī. Maktabah Ibn Taymiyyah, 1994.

Al-Taftāzānī, Saʻd al-Dīn. Sharḥ Al-ʻAqā’id al-Nasafiyyah. Idārat al-Ṣidīq, 2018.

Al-Tirmidhī, Abū ʻĪshā Muḥammad ibn ʻĪshā. Sunan Al-Tirmidhī. Edited by Shuʻayb Al-Arna’ūṭ. Dār al-Risālah al-ʻĀlamiyyah, 2009.

Al-Ṭūfī, Najm al-Dīn. Sharḥ Mukhtaṣar Al-Rawḍah. Edited by ʻAbd Allāh ibn ‘Abd al-Muḥsin al-Turkī. Muassasat al-Risālah, 1987.

Al-Ṭūsī, Abū Naṣr al-Sarrāj. Al-Lumaʻ Fi al-Taṣawwuf. Edited by ‘Abd al-Ḥalīm Maḥmūd. Dār al-Kutub al-Ḥadīth, 1960.

Ansari, M. Abdul Haq. “Ḥusayn Ibn Manṣūr Al-Ḥallāj: Ideas of an Ecstatic.” Islamic Studies 39, no. 2 (2000): 291–320.

Armita, Pipin, Maulana Yusuf, and Muhammad Zein Maulana. “Religious Moderation amid Globalization: The Challenges of Taṭarruf, Takfīr, and Taʻāṣub.” Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation 4, no. 1 (2025): 163–81.

Brock, Brian. “Seeking a Method and Finding Philological Practices of Re-Membering.” Journal of Disability & Religion 26, no. 2 (2022): 144–48.

Buehler, Michael. “Do Discriminatory Laws Have Societal Origins? The Diffusion of Anti-Ahmadiyah Regulations in Indonesia.” Politics and Religion 16, no. 3 (2023): 468–91.

Burrell, David, and Herbert Mason. “An Excerpt from ‘The Death of al-Hallaj.’” Notre Dame English Journal 12, no. 1 (1979): 55–66.

Byman, Daniel, and Asfandyar and Mir. “Assessing Al-Qaeda: A Debate.” Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 47, no. 12 (2024): 1559–98.

Daudy, Ahmad. Syeikh Nuruddin Ar-Raniry: Sejarah, Karya Dan Sanggahan Terhadap Wujudiyyah Di Aceh. Bulan Bintang, 1978.

Daudy, Ahmad. “Tinjauan Atas Al-Fath al-Mubin ‘Ala al-Mulhidin Karya Syaikh Nuruddin Ar-Raniri.” In Warisan Intelektual Islam Indonesia: Telaah Atas Karya-Karya Klasik. Mizan, 1992.

Drewes, G W J. “Nūr Al-Dīn al-Rānīrī’s Ḥujjat Al-Ṣiddīq Li-Daf‘ al-Zindīq Re-Examined.” Journal of the Malaysian Branch of the Royal Asiatic Society 47, no. 2 (226) (1974): 83–104.

Drewes, Gerardus W J. “Nūr Al-Dīn al-Rānīrī’s Charge of Heresy against Hamzah and Shamsuddin from an International Point of View.” In Cultural Contact and Textual Interpretation, edited by C.D. Grijns S.O. Robson &. Brill, 1986.

Fansuri, Hamzah. Asrār Al-‘Ārifīn. Edited by Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. University of Malaya Press, 1970.

Fathurrahman, Oman. “Sejarah Pengkafiran Dan Marginalisasi Paham Keagamaan Di Melayu Dan Jawa (Sebuah Telaah Sumber).” Analisis: Jurnal Studi Keislaman XI, no. 2 (2011): 447–74.

Fatwa MPU No 09/2014. Pemahaman, Pemikiran, Pengamalan, Dan Penyiaran Agama Islam Di Aceh. Aceh, 2014.

Fuhriman, Christopher, Medina Richard M., and Simon and Brewer. “Introducing a Dataset of Multi-Scale Geographies of ISIS Ideology from ISIS Sources.” Terrorism and Political Violence 34, no. 4 (2022): 817–34.

Ghazzī, ‘Abd Allāh Shams al-Dīn Muḥammad ibn Qāsim ibn Muḥammad. Fatḥ Al-Qarīb al-Mujīb. Dār Ibn Ḥazm, 2005.

Ḥanīfah, Abū. Al-Fiqh al-Akbar. Maktabat al-Furqān, 1999.

Harun, 'Abd al-Salām. Taḥqīq Al-Nuṣūṣ Wa Nasharuhā. Maktabah wa Maṭbu‘at al-Khānjī, 1998.

Harun, Jelani. “Bustan Al‐Salatin, ‘the Garden of Kings’: A Universal History and Adab Work from Seventeenth‐Century Aceh.” Indonesia and the Malay World 32, no. 92 (2004): 21–52.

Hasan, Noorhaidi. “Salafism in Indonesia: Transnational Islam, Violent Activism, and Cultural Resistance.” In Routledge Handbook of Contemporary Indonesia, 1st ed., edited by Robert W. Hefner. Routledge, 2018.

Hasyim, Syafiq. The Shariatisation of Indonesia: The Politics of the Council of Indonesian Ulama (Majelis Ulama Indonesia, MUI). Brill, 2023.

Haynes, Jeffrey. “Al Qaeda: Ideology and Action.” Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 8, no. 2 (2006): 177–91.

Hermansyah, Hermansyah. “Naskah Tibyan Fi Ma’rifat al-Adyan: Interpretasi Aliran Sesat Di Aceh Menurut Nuruddin Ar-Raniry.” Jumantara: Jurnal Manuskrip Nusantara 5, no. 1 (2014): 41–60.

Husen, Zoehelmy. “The Polemics of Waḥdat Al-Wujūd: Debates on Sufi Thought in Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century Southeast Asia.” Preprint, Hartford International University for Religion and Peace, 2021.

Indonesian Ulema Council, Himpunan Fatwa MUI Tentang Paham Keagamaan Di Indonesia. Direktorat Urusan Agama Islam dan Pembinaan Syariah Kementerian Agama Republik Indonesia, 2011.

IPAC Report No. 32. “The Anti-Salafi Campaign in Aceh.” Jakarta, 2016. https://understandingconflict.sgp1.digitaloceanspaces.com/dashboard/474b568e3ac51b1260a92c1e278e7573.pdf.

Jailani, Mohd. Rushdan Bin Mohd. “An Annotated Translation and Transliteration of Tibyan Fi Ma’rifat al-Adyan of Nur al-Din al-Raniri.” Preprint, International Institute of Islamic Thought and Civilization (ISTAC), 2003.

Jeofrey, Siti Adibah Binti Mohmad, and M Zaki. “Islamic Law and Customary Law in the Prohibition of Sogit Marriage in Sabah, Malaysia.” Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society 1, no. 1 (2025): 85–96.

Kadivar, Jamileh. “Exploring Takfir, Its Origins and Contemporary Use: The Case of Takfiri Approach in Daesh’s Media.” Contemporary Review of the Middle East 7, no. 3 (2020): 259–85.

Lala, Ismail. “Unity and Multiplicity of Ibn ‘Arabī’s Philosophy in Indonesian Sufism.” Asian Philosophy 34, no. 1 (2024): 45–55.

Luhuringbudi, Teguh, Wilnan Fatahillah, Amin Muhtar, Mowafg Abrahem Masuwd, and Safa Husayn Alrumayh. “The Impact of the US-China Trade War on the Application of Islamic Law in Indonesia.” Islamic Law and Social Issues in Society 1, no. 1 (2025): 1–23.

Maḥmūd, Nādirah Ḥasan ‘Abd al-Jawād. “Khaṭar Al-Tashīk Fī al-Maʻlūm Min al-Dīn Bi al-Ḍarūrah.” Majallah Kulliyyah Uṣūl Al-Dīn Wa al-Daʻwah Bi al-Minūfiyyah 41 (2022): 68–172.

Makruf, Jamhari, and Saifudin Asrori. “In the Making of Salafi-Based Islamic Schools in Indonesia.” Al-Jami’ah: Journal of Islamic Studies 60, no. 1 (2022): 227–64.

Mariani, Nina. “Ahmadiyah, Conflicts, and Violence in Contemporary Indonesia.” Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies 3, no. 1 (2013): 1–30.

Mustajab, Muhammad, and Edi Kurniawan. “From Heretical Fatwa to Judicial Review: Salafi, Ulama, and Communal Conflict in Aceh.” Penamas 37, no. 1 (2024): 131–44.

Nasir, Mohamad Nasrin Mohamad. “Analisis Terhadap Penghujahan Al-Raniri Dalam Kitab Fathul Mubin Ala al-Mulhidin Terhadap Golongan Wujudiah.” Malay Literature 33, no. 1 (2020): 21–44. https://doi.org/10.37052/ml.33(1)no2.

Nasution, Ismail Fahmi Arrauf. “Buku Panduan Pengkafiran: Evaluasi Kritis Tibyān Fī Ma’rifat al-Adyān Karya Nūr al-Dīn al-Ranīrī.” Jurnal Theologia 29, no. 1 (2018): 59–84.

Nirzalin, and Yogi and Febriandi. “Awsaja Mobilization and Intolerance: Sub-State Ideology, Religious Vigilantism in Aceh, Indonesia.” Cogent Social Sciences 8, no. 1 (2022): 2089382.

Opwis, Felicitas. Maṣlaḥah and the Purpose of the Law: Islamic Discourse on Legal Change from the 4th/10th to 8th/14th Century. Brill, 2010.

Othman, Mohamad Zaini. Laṭā’if al-Asrār Li Ahl Allāh al-Atyār of Nūr al-Dīn al-Rānīrī. UTM Press, 2011.

Permana, Yogi Setya. “Subnational Sectarianisation: Clientelism, Religious Authority, and Intra-Religious Rivalry in Aceh.” Religion, State & Society 49, no. 2 (2021): 142–56.

Poljarevic, Emin. “Theology of Violence-Oriented Takfirism as a Political Theory: The Case of the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).” In Handbook of Islamic Sects and Movements, edited by Muhammad A & Carole M. Cusack. Bril, 2021.

Prihantoro, Hijrian Angga. “Examining Witness Interest: The Obstacles of Testimony in Islamic Jurisprudence and Positive Law.” Justicia Islamica 21, no. 1 (2024): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v21i1.8653.

Rahmadi, M Agung, Said Agil Husin Al-Munawar, Helsa Nasution, Luthfiah Mawar, Nurzahara Sihombing, and Ismail Saleh Lubis. “Confirmatory Factor Analysis of Understanding Fiqh Al-Muwāzanāt and Emotional Maturity in Religious Conflict Resolution.” Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation 4, no. 1 (2025): 61–88.

Rasito, Rasito, and Izza Mahendra. “Moderasi Fikih Melalui Pendekatan Maqasid Al-Shari‘ah Yusuf al-Qaradhawi: Mencari Relevansinya Di Indonesia.” Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation 1, no. 1 (2022): 36–65.

Riddell, Peter G. “Shariʻa-Mindedness in the Malay World and the Indian Connection: The Contributions of Nur al-Din al-Raniri and Nik Abdul Aziz Bin Haji Nik Mat.” In Islamic Connections: Muslim Societies in South and Southeast Asia, edited by R Michael Feener and Terenjit Sevea. ISEAS Publishing, 2009.

Ropi, Ismatu. “Muslim‐Christian Polemics in Indonesian Islamic Literature.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 9, no. 2 (1998): 217–29.

Roziqin, Akhmad Ainur, Puspa Arum Yasinatul, Ali Mursyid Azisi, Luluk Fikri Zuhriyah, and Moh Hakim Alfarisi. “The Challenge of Religious Moderation amidst the Rise of Religious Extremism among Instant Ustadz in Indonesia.” Al-Wasatiyah: Journal of Religious Moderation 4, no. 1 (2025): 1–30.

Saleh, Abdul Mun’im, Lukman Santoso, and Sukron Ma’mun. “Eksistensi Teori Maslahah Dan Persinggungannya Dengan Utilitarianisme Dalam Pemikiran Ilmu Hukum.” Nagari Perdikan: Journal of Law and Policy Studies 1, no. 1 (2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.71155/by71ar69.

Srivastava, Neelam. “Philological Method and Subaltern Pasts.” Italian Culture 40, no. 1 (2022): 49–60.

Steenbrink, Karel A. “Jesus and the Holy Spirit in the Writings of Nūr al‐Din al‐Raniri.” Islam and Christian–Muslim Relations 1, no. 2 (1990): 192–207.

Vakily, Abdollah. “Sufism, Power Politics, and Reform: Al-Rānīrī’s Opposition to Hamzah al-Fanṣūrī’s Teachings Reconsidered.” Studia Islamika 4, no. 1 (1997).

Wormser, Paul. “The Religious Debates of Aceh in the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Century: An Invisible Cultural Dialogue?” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 55, no. 2/3 (2012): 369–82.

Zayd, Muṣṭafā. Al-Maṣalah Fī al-Tashrīʻ al-Islāmī Wa Najm al-Dīn al-Ṭūfī. Dār al-Fikr al-ʻArabī, 1964.

Downloads

Published

2025-11-25

Issue

Section

Articles