Evidentiary Challenges in AI-Mediated E-Commerce Disputes
Comparative Perspectives from the EU, US, GCC, and Islamic Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v23i1.11809Keywords:
e-commerce, legal liability, digital evidence, AI intermediaries, legal reformAbstract
This article aims to analyse the use of artificial intelligence (AI) as an intermediary in e-commerce transactions, thereby increasing the challenges of proving damages, particularly due to algorithmic opacity, system autonomy, and the fragmentation of legal liability subjects. Using a comparative legal approach in the European Union, the United States, and Saudi Arabia in the context of the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC), with Islamic law as an autonomous regime of proof. Using a doctrinal comparative method, the study analyses statutory instruments, judicial practices, and emerging AI regulatory initiatives to evaluate how different legal systems address evidentiary burdens and liability attribution in AI-mediated disputes. The findings demonstrate that the European Union adopts a preventive, risk-based approach to digital evidence and accountability. In contrast, the United States relies on an ex-post, fault-oriented, and fragmented adjudicatory model. In contrast, Saudi Arabia and the broader GCC remain in a transitional phase, gradually integrating electronic evidence into civil law without a comprehensive AI-specific liability framework. Crucially, the article argues that Islamic law offers a coherent and independent evidentiary framework grounded in principles such as bayyinah, qarīnah, moral accountability (amānah), and harm prevention (lā ḍarar), which are particularly relevant in addressing AI opacity by treating AI outputs as corroborative rather than determinative proof. The study proposes doctrinal and evidentiary reforms that integrate comparative legal insights with Islamic jurisprudence to enhance legal certainty, justice, and accountability in AI-driven e-commerce disputes.
References
Abbasi, Hafsa, Summayyah Summayyah, and Syed Naeem Badshah. “English-5 Principles of Electronic Evidence in Sharī‘Ah and Law-A Comparative Study.” Al-Aijaz Research Journal of Islamic Studies & Humanities 5, no. 2 (June 2021): 50–67. https://doi.org/10.53575/English5.v5.02(21).50-67.
Abudaqqa, Fatma. “Artificial Intelligence for IT Governance in Saudi Arabia: Opportunities, Challenges, and Future Directions within COBIT 2019 and ISO/IEC 38500 Frameworks.” European Scientific Journal, ESJ 21, no. 25 (September 2025): 125–59. https://doi.org/10.19044/esj.2025.v21n25p125.
Aggrey, Richard, Emmanuel Adjirachor, Bright Ansah Adjei, Karl Osei Afoduo, Nana Adwoa Konadu Dsane, and Gladys Doe. “The Role of Blockchain, IoT and AR in Future Healthcare: A Review.” IJFMR - International Journal For Multidisciplinary Research 6, no. 6 (December 2024). https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i06.33535.
Alakayleh, Omar. “The Role of the Jordanian Public Security in Collecting Digital Evidences and Its Impact on the Detection of Crime.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5359002. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, July 20, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5359002.
Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, Putri Shafarina Thahir, Nafik Muthohirin, and Norhasliza Ghapa. “Artificial Intelligence in Indonesia’s Financial Sector: Regulatory and Islamic Law Perspectives.” Justicia Islamica 22, no. 2 (November 2025): 303–26. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v22i2.10479.
Alhejaili, Mohammad Omar Mohammad. “Securing the Kingdom’s e-Commerce Frontier: Evaluation of Saudi Arabia’s Cybersecurity Legal Frameworks.” Journal of Governance and Regulation 13, nos. 2, special issue (2024): 275.
Bahangulu, Julien Kiesse, and Louis Owusu-Berko. “Algorithmic Bias, Data Ethics, and Governance: Ensuring Fairness, Transparency and Compliance in AI-Powered Business Analytics Applications.” World Journal of Advanced Research and Reviews 25, no. 2 (2025): 1746–63. https://doi.org/10.30574/wjarr.2025.25.2.0571.
Bashayreh, Mohammad. Saudi Arabia’s Vision 2030, Shariah, and Contemporary Legal Trends: The Transformative Power of Law in Guiding Reforms. Revival Press Limited, 2024. https://revivalpress.co.uk/books/saudi-arabia%E2%80%99s-vision-2030-shariah-and-contemporary-legal-trends.
Bawack, Ransome Epie, Samuel Fosso Wamba, Kevin Daniel André Carillo, and Shahriar Akter. “Artificial Intelligence in E-Commerce: A Bibliometric Study and Literature Review.” Electronic Markets 32, no. 1 (March 2022): 297–338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-022-00537-z.
Benerofe, Steven. “AI Governance and the Verification Gap: A Framework for Law and Policy Under Computational Intractability.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5629290. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, September 29, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5629290.
Biden, Joseph R. Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence. Edited by Fred Zimmerman. Nimble Books LLC, 2023.
Bottomley, Dane, and Donrich Thaldar. “Liability for Harm Caused by AI in Healthcare: An Overview of the Core Legal Concepts.” Frontiers in Pharmacology 14 (December 2023). https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2023.1297353.
Buiten, M., A. De Streel, and M. Peitz. “The Law and Economics of AI Liability.” Computer Law & Security Review 48 (2023): 105794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794.
Buiten, Miriam, Alexandre de Streel, and Martin Peitz. “The Law and Economics of AI Liability.” Computer Law & Security Review 48 (April 2023): 105794. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2023.105794.
Crawford, Kate, and Ryan Calo. “There Is a Blind Spot in AI Research.” Nature 538, no. 7625 (October 2016): 311–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/538311a.
David, Anne, Tan Yigitcanlar, Kevin Desouza, Karen Mossberger, Pauline Hope Cheong, Juan Corchado, Prithvi Bhat Beeramoole, and Alexander Paz. “Public Perceptions of Responsible AI in Local Government: A Multi-Country Study Using the Theory of Planned Behaviour.” Government Information Quarterly 42, no. 3 (September 2025): 102054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2025.102054.
Ebers, Martin. “Truly Risk-Based Regulation of Artificial Intelligence How to Implement the EU’s AI Act.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 16, no. 2 (June 2025): 684–703. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2024.78.
European Commission. “Proposal for a Regulation of The European Parliament and of The Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) and Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts.” 2021. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52021PC0206.
“Executive Order on the Safe, Secure, and Trustworthy Development and Use of Artificial Intelligence.” Digital Government Hub, n.d. Accessed January 27, 2026. http://digitalgovernmenthub.org/examples/executive-order-on-the-safe-secure-and-trustworthy-development-and-use-of-artificial-intelligence/.
Fitriyah, Aidatul, and Daryna Dzemish Abdulovna. “EU’s AI Regulation Approaches and Their Implication for Human Rights.” Media Iuris 7, no. 3 (October 2024): 417–38. https://doi.org/10.20473/mi.v7i3.62050.
Hacker, Philipp, Johann Cordes, and Janina Rochon. “Regulating Gatekeeper Artificial Intelligence and Data: Transparency, Access and Fairness under the Digital Markets Act, the General Data Protection Regulation and Beyond.” European Journal of Risk Regulation 15, no. 1 (March 2024): 49–86. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2023.81.
Hacker, Philipp, and Jan-Hendrik Passoth. “Varieties of AI Explanations Under the Law. From the GDPR to the AIA, and Beyond.” In xxAI - Beyond Explainable AI: International Workshop, Held in Conjunction with ICML 2020, July 18, 2020, Vienna, Austria, Revised and Extended Papers, edited by Andreas Holzinger, Randy Goebel, Ruth Fong, Taesup Moon, Klaus-Robert Müller, and Wojciech Samek, 343–73. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04083-2_17.
Huberman, Pinchas. “Tort Law, Corrective Justice and the Problem of Autonomous-Machine-Caused Harm.” Canadian Journal of Law & Jurisprudence 34, no. 1 (February 2021): 105–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/cjlj.2020.3.
Jariwala, Mayur. “A Comparative Analysis of the EU AI Act and the Colorado AI Act: Regulatory Approaches to Artificial Intelligence Governance.” International Journal of Computer Applications 186, no. 38 (September 2024): 23–29. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2024923954.
Julia Apostle. “New EU Directive Modernizes Defective Product Liability to Address New Technologies.” Orrick. Accessed October 31, 2025. https://www.orrick.com/en/Insights/2025/06/New-EU-Directive-Modernizes-Defective-Product-Liability-to-Address-New-Technologies?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
Justo-Hanani, Ronit. “Risk-Based Approach to EU AI Act: Benefits and Challenges of Co-Regulation.” Policy Design and Practice, January 2, 2026. World. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/25741292.2025.2610869.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. “Between Separation and Unity: The Interplay of Law and Morality in Islamic Jurisprudence.” In Sharia Law in the Twenty-First Century, by Muhammad Khalid Masud and Hana Jalloul Muro, 21–46. World Scientific (Europe), 2022. https://doi.org/10.1142/9781800611689_0002.
———. Principles of Islamic Jurisprudence. 3. rev. and Enlarged ed., Repr. Cambridge: The Islamic Texts Society, 2011.
Kanojia, Siddharth. “Ensuring Privacy of Personal Data: A Panoramic View of Legal Developments in Personal Data Protection Law in Saudi Arabia.” Manchester Journal of Transnational Islamic Law and Practice 19, no. 3 (October 2023): 270–76.
Kiani, Fatemeh, and Alireza Shafiee. “Global Harmonization of AI Regulation: Addressing Cross-Border Challenges in Ethical Standards, Accountability, and Liability.” Legal Studies in Digital Age 1, no. 1 (October 2022): 14–26.
Korbatieh, Souha. “The Law of Evidence in the Islamic Criminal Justice System: A Critical Appraisal in the Light of Modern Technology.” Thesis, Macquarie University, 2022. https://doi.org/10.25949/19440422.v1.
Korshenko, Vladyslav. “Risk Regulation Approach to Governing Artificial Intelligence on the Example of the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act / Submitted by Vladyslav Korshenko.” Thesis, University of Salzburg, 2024. http://eplus.uni-salzburg.at/Abschlussarbeiten/9648422.
Levi, Stuart D., Ken D. Kumayama, William E. Ridgway, and Mana Ghaemmaghami. “Colorado’s Landmark AI Act: What Companies Need To Know.” Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, June 24, 2024. https://www.skadden.com/insights/publications/2024/06/colorados-landmark-ai-act.
Lunca, Daria. “Towards a Coherent EU Civil Liability Regime for AI-Caused Harm.” European Journal of Law and Public Administration 12, no. 1 (August 2025): 23–50. https://doi.org/10.18662/eljpa/12.1/253.
Mahler, Tobias. “Between Risk Management and Proportionality: The Risk-Based Approach in the EU’s Artificial Intelligence Act Proposal.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 4001444. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, September 30, 2021. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=4001444.
Malja, Seyedeh Negin, and Hossein Afrasiabi. “Artificial Intelligence and Society: Mapping the Research through a Systematic Review.” AI & SOCIETY, ahead of print, September 8, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02555-9.
Mensah, George Benneh. Artificial Intelligence and Ethics: A Comprehensive Review of Bias Mitigation, Transparency, and Accountability in AI Systems. Version 1. 2023. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.23381.19685/1.
Mergen, Aybike, Nergiz Çetin-Kılıç, and Mustafa F. Özbilgin. “Artificial Intelligence and Bias Towards Marginalised Groups: Theoretical Roots and Challenges.” In AI and Diversity in a Datafied World of Work: Will the Future of Work Be Inclusive?, vol. 12, edited by Joana Vassilopoulou and Olivia Kyriakidou, 0. Emerald Publishing Limited, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2051-233320250000012004.
Mesarčík, Matúš, Sara Solarova, Juraj Podroužek, and Maria Bielikova. “Stance on The Proposal for a Regulation Laying Down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence – Artificial Intelligence Act.” Preprint, SocArXiv, March 9, 2022. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/yzfg8.
Min, Alfonso. “Artifical Intelligence and Bias: Challenges, Implications, and Remedies.” Journal of Social Research 2, no. 11 (October 2023): 3808–17. https://doi.org/10.55324/josr.v2i11.1477.
Mubaroq, Muhammad Husni. “Truth In Two Faces: An Epistemological Examination Of Islamic Law between Material And Formal.” Al-Ulum: Multidisciplinary Journal of Science 1, no. 2 (July 2025): 85–95.
Nderu, Lawrence, Ruth Oginga, Bonface Butichi, John Rono, Florence Njau, Felista Mogire, Derrick Matindo, Daniel Muiruri, and Agnes Kiragga. “DataLawCompanion: Enhancing Data Protection Law Compliance in the Digital Age.” Data Science Journal 23, no. 1 (June 2024). https://doi.org/10.5334/dsj-2024-036.
Nevejans, Nathalie. “European Union’s Regulation on the Placing on the Market and Use of AI Systems: A Critical Overview of the AI Act.” In Research Handbook on the Law of Artificial Intelligence, edited by Woodrow Barfield and Ugo Pagallo, 489–540. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035316496.00031.
Nicolis, Anna, Nigel Kingsman, and Hughes Hall. AI Explainability in the EU AI Act: A Case for an NLE Approach Towards Pragmatic Explanations. 1, no. 1 (July 2024).
Nikolinakos, Nikos Th. “Reforming the EU Civil Liability Framework Applicable to Artificial Intelligence and Other Emerging Digital Technologies: Defective Products—the Revised Product Liability Directive.” In Adapting the EU Civil Liability Regime to the Digital Age: Artificial Intelligence, Robotics, and Other Emerging Technologies, vol. 68, by Nikos Th. Nikolinakos, 477–621. Law, Governance and Technology Series. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67969-8_9.
OECD. Artificial Intelligence in Society. OECD Publishing, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1787/eedfee77-en.
Osasona, Femi, Olukunle Oladipupo Amoo, Akoh Atadoga, Temitayo Oluwaseun Abrahams, Oluwatoyin Ajoke Farayola, and Benjamin Samson Ayinla. “Reviewing The Ethical Implications Of AI In Decision Making Processes.” International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research 6, no. 2 (February 2024): 322–35. https://doi.org/10.51594/ijmer.v6i2.773.
Phuc, Dao Gia, and Nguyen Van Duong. “A Risk-Based Approach to Artificial Intelligence Regulation: Lessons from the European Union for Vietnam.” VNU Journal of Science: Legal Studies 41, no. 4 (December 2025). https://doi.org/10.25073/2588-1167/vnuls.4799.
Polok, Beata, and Mariana Dussin. “AI Governance in Saudi Arabia: Cultural Values and Ethical AI Regulations in Comparative Perspective.” Yearbook of Islamic and Middle Eastern Law Online 24, no. 1 (April 2025): 191–219. https://doi.org/10.1163/22112987-bja00004.
Prihantoro, Hijrian Angga. “Examining Witness Interest: The Obstacles of Testimony in Islamic Jurisprudence and Positive Law.” Justicia Islamica 21, no. 1 (June 2024): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v21i1.8653.
Rajendran, Sruthi, and Akshay Dinesh Kumar. “Liability for Harm Caused by AI: Examining the Legal Responsibility for the Actions of Autonomous Systems.” International Journal of Law Management & Humanities 6, no. 2 (2023): 214–24. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.114348.
Ramakrishnan, Ketan, Gregory Smith, and Conor Downey. U.S. Tort Liability for Large-Scale Artificial Intelligence Damages: A Primer for Developers and Policymakers. 2024. https://www.rand.org/pubs/research_reports/RRA3084-1.html.
Regulation (EU) 2016/679 of the European Parliament and of the Council. (2016). General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), Article 22. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2016/679/oj
Rubel, Alan. “The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information, by Frank Pasquale. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 2015. 320 Pp. ISBN 978–0674368279.” Business Ethics Quarterly 26, no. 4 (October 2016): 568–71. https://doi.org/10.1017/beq.2016.50.
Saleh, Redeer Avdal, and Subhi R. M. Zeebaree. “Artificial Intelligence in E-Commerce and Digital Marketing: A Systematic Review of Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Implications.” Asian Journal of Research in Computer Science 18, no. 3 (February 2025): 395–410. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajrcos/2025/v18i3601.
Sargiotis, Dimitrios. “Ethical AI in Information Technology: Navigating Bias, Privacy, Transparency, and Accountability.” Advances in Machine Learning and Artificial Intelligence 5, no. 3 (2024): 1–14. https://doi.org/10.33140/amlai.05.03.03.
Saudi Ministry of Commerce. “E-Commerce Law (Royal Decree No. M/126).” (2019). https://mc.gov.sa/en/RulesRegulations/Regulations/Pages/EcommerceLaw.aspx
Saudi Ministry of Justice/MISA. (2022/2025). Law of Evidence (English). MISA
SDAIA. “Personal Data Protection Law & Implementing Regulations.” (2023–2025). SDAIA+2SDAIA+2
Schuster, W. Michael, Joseph Avery, and Camilla Alexandra Hrdy. “The AI Penalty in Trade Secret Law.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 5610270. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, June 1, 2025. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5610270.
Shaleh, Ahmad Syukri. “Ibn Taymiyya’s Concept of Istiḥsān : An Understanding of Legal Reasoning in Islamic Jurisprudence.” Thesis, McGill University, 1995. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=23241.
Shaping Europe’s digital future. “Proposal for a Regulation Laying down Harmonised Rules on Artificial Intelligence.” April 21, 2021. https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/library/proposal-regulation-laying-down-harmonised-rules-artificial-intelligence.
Sruthi Rajendran and Akshay Dinesh Kumar. “Liability for Harm Caused by AI: Examining the Legal Responsibility for the Actions of Autonomous Systems | International Journal of Law Management & Humanities.” International Journal of Law Management and Humanities 6, no. 2 (2023): 214–24. https://doij.org/10.10000/IJLMH.114348.
UNCITRAL. “Digital Economy and Legal Frameworks for Electronic Commerce.” (2023).
Yeung, Karen. “Algorithmic Regulation: A Critical Interrogation.” Regulation & Governance 12, no. 4 (2018): 505–23. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12158.
Yusrin, Nur Amalyna. “Ai-Powered E-Commerce: Elevating E-Service Quality Through Utilitarian And Hedonic With E-Satisfaction As The Bridge To E-Loyalty.” Jurnal Multidisiplin Sahombu 5, no. 01 (January 2025): 216–31.
Zahid, Anowar, Ahmad Azam Mohd Shariff, Mohd Munzil bin Muhamad, Ramalinggam Rajamanickam, Mazupi Abdul Rahman, and Noorfajri Ismail. “Qarinah: Admissibility of Circumstantial Evidence in Hudud and Qisas Cases.” SSRN Scholarly Paper No. 2753353. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network, 2015. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=2753353.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Shatha Ismaeel, Khalid Alammari, Zinah Ghanim Younus

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.




