Indonesian Political Kleptocracy and Oligarchy: A Critical Review from the Perspective of Islamic Law
Abstract views: 1243
,
PDF downloads: 616
Abstract
This study discusses corruption in the Indonesian political system from Islamic law, particularly regarding the Kleptocracy and political oligarchy. One of the most basic corruption causes comes from an internal personality factor, human character: greed and wasteful. Additionally, some factors also come from human external factors, namely the perpetrators' coercion, because they are tied to a system. Corruption is carried out by individuals and in cooperation/conspiracy between the bureaucracy, corporations, and political parties. Elites called them Kleptocracy and political oligarchy. This research is descriptive qualitative research with an approach based on legal analysis. This research has found several things. First, corruption in the Indonesian political system can be categorized into acts of Ghulul (treachery), Risywah (Gratification/bribery), Khiyanah (Unfaithful), Sariqah (theft), and Hirabah (Grand Theft/ Robbery). Second. From an Islamic perspective, the strategy to eradicate corruption can be carried out by imposing sanctions, including sanctions in the world's dimensions and the hereafter. This research encourages strengthening the socio-religious system, especially among religious leaders, as a preventive and curative form of handling corruption in the political system in Indonesia.
References
Acemoglu, Daron, Thierry Verdier, and James A. Robinson. “Alfred Marshall Lecture Kleptocracy And Divide-And-Rule: A Model of Personal Rule.” Journal of the European Economic Association 2, no. 2 (2004): 162–92.
Alasyas Assubuhastani, Abu Daud Sulaiman bin. Sunan Abu Daud. Vol. 2. 2710. Bairut-Libanon: Darul Kutub, 1996.
Ali, La Ode Bunga, and Muh. Sutri Mansyah. “Penafsiran Keterangan Palsu Dalam Persidangan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Kaitannya Kasus Obstruction of Justice: Kajian Putusan Nomor 14/Pid/Tpk/2015/Pt.DKI.” Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial 16, no. 1 (2019).
Annaisaburi, Abu Husain Muslim bin Hajjaj Alqusyairi. Kepemimpinan. Bairut-Libanon: Darul Fikri, 1993.
Andiko, T. “Sanksi Bagi Pemberi Dan Penerima Gratifikasi Perspektif Hukum Pidana Islam.” Qiyas: Jurnal Hukum Islam Dan Peradilan 1, no. 1 (2017): 117–32.
Coates, Patricia Gloster, and Linda Quest. “Kleptocracy: Curse of Development.” International Social Science Review 8, no. 1 (2015): 3–19.
Departemen Agama RI. Al-Qur’an Dan Terjemahannya. Bandung: J-Art, 2004.
Hakim, Nugraha Ikhsanul. “Pembuktian Terbalik Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi Ditinjau Dari Fiqh Jinayah (Studi Di Pengadilan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Palembang).” Skripsi, UIN Raden Fatah, 2019.
Hamzah, Amir. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan. Malang: CV. Literasi Nusantara Abadi, 2020.
Harto, K. “Pendidikan Anti Korupsi Berbasis Agama. , 20, No.1, (2014): 121-138.” Intizar 20, no. 1 (2014): 121–38.
Hatees, Budi. Ulat Di Kebun Polri ( Dinamika Penegakan Keadilan Hukum). Jakarta: Raih Asa Sukses, 2013.
Heywood, Paul M. “Rethinking Corruption: Hocus-Pocus, Locus and Focus. The Slavonic and East European Review.” Innovations in Corruption Studies 95, no. 1 (January 2017): 21–48.
Indonesia Corruption Watch. “Outlook Korupsi Politik 2018:Ancaman Korupsi Di Balik Pemilu 2018 Dan 2019.” Jakarta, 2018.
Jahja, H.Juni Sjafrien. Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Jakarta: Fokus Media, 2008.
Jane, Elliott. Using Narrative in Social Research: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. London: Sage Publication Ltd, 2005.
Junius Nge, Herri. “Oligarki Partai Politik Dalam Rekrutmencalon Kepala Daerah (Studi Kasus Munculnya Calon Tunggal Pada Pemilihan Kepala Daerah Kabupaten Landak Tahun 2017).” Jurnal Academia Praja 1, no. 1 (2018): 59–84.
Kantaprawira, Rusdi. Sistem Politik Indonesia. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algesindo, 1985.
Kennedy, David. “Anarchism, Shooling, and Democratic Sensibility.” Stud Philos Educ, 2016, 1–18.
LaPorte, Jody. “Foreign versus Domestic Bribery: Explaining Repression in Kleptocratic Regimes.” Comparative Politics 50, no. 1 (October 2017): 83–102.
Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media Group, 2011.
Muhammadiyah dan Nahdaltul Ulama (NU). Korupsi Itu Kafir. Jakarta: Mizan, 2010.
Muhaki, M. “Problem Delik Korupsi Dalam Hukum Pidana Islam.” Jurnal Studi Islam: Pancawahana 12, no. 2 (2017): 22–38.
Pardede, Marulak. “Aspek Hukum Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh Korporasi Dalam Bidang Perpajakan (Legal Aspect of Eradication Of Corruption Criminal Act In Taxation).” Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure 20, no. 3 (2020): 335–61.
Pardo, Italo. “Who Is Corrupt ? Anthropological Reflections On The Moral, The Criminal And The Borderline.” Human Affairs 23 (2013): 124–47.
Samsuddin, Haris, Cakti Indra Gunawan, and Cahyo Sasmito. “Membongkar Relasi Kekuasaan Oligarki di Kota Batu: Studi Kasus Penyalahgunaan Kekuasaan Dalam Pemberian Keringanan Pajak Dan Korupsi Kebijakan Pt Bwr.” Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi XVI, no. 2 (2019): 210–27.
Santoso, Listiyono, Dewi Meyriswati, and Ilham Nur Alfian. “Korupsi Dan Mentalitas: Kendala Kultural Dalam Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Masyarakat, Kebudayaan Dan Politik 27, no. 4 (2014): 173–83.
Satriajaya, Johan, Lilik Handajani, and I Nyoman Nugraha Ardana Putra. “Turbulensi Dan Legalisasi Kleptokrasi Dalam Pengelolaan Keuangan Desa.” Jurnal Akuntansi Multiparadigma JAMAL 8, no. 2 (2017): 227–429.
Simarmata, Markus H. Peranan. “E-Government Dan Media Sosial Untuk Mewujudkan Budaya Transparansi Dan Pemberantasan Korupsi.” Jurnal Integritas KPK 3, no. 2 (2017): 203–29.
Suryani, Ita. “Peran Media Iklan Televisi Sebagai Media Kritik Kasus Korupsi (Studi Kasus Pada Iklan Konten Djarum 76 Versi Kontes Jin).” Jurnal Komunikasi 9, no. 2 (2015).
Wahid, Abdul. “Kolaborasi Kleptokrasi Birokrasi Dan Korporasi.” Jurnal Yurispunden 1, no. 1 (2018): 1–16.
Warf, Barney. “Global Geographies of Corruption.” GeoJournal 81, no. 5 (2016): 657–69.
Wolf, Mark L. “The World Needs an International Anti-Corruption Court.” Daedalus 147, no. 3 (2018): 144–56.
Yuhermansyah, E., and Z. Fariza. “Pidana Mati Dalam Undang-Undang Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Kajian Teori Zawajir Dan Jawabir).” Legitimasi: Jurnal Hukum Pidana Dan Politik Hukum 6, no. 1 (2017): 156–74.
Copyright (c) 2021 Anita Marwing Marwing
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
.png)
