Maqāṣid al-SharÄ«a in the Study of Hadith and its Implication for the Renewal of Islamic Law: Study on Jasser Auda’s Thought

Authors

  • Ahmad Syafi'i Sulaiman Jamrozi Faculty of Sharia, Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri, Ponorogo
  • Suad Fikriawan Faculty of Sharia, Institut Agama Islam Sunan Giri, Ponorogo
  • Syamsul Anwar Faculty Shari and Law, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta
  • Misnen Ardiansyah Faculty of Economic & Islamic Business, UIN Sunan Kalijaga, Yogyakarta

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i1.3269

Keywords:

Maqāṣid, Hadīth, Islamic Law, Narration, Purpose, Anthropocentric

Abstract

This article examines Jasser Auda's maqaá¹£id approach to studying hadith and its implications for the renewal of Islamic law. Generally speaking, one way to better understand the purpose of the hadÄ«th is through contextualizing the Prophetic narrations (hadÄ«th), primarily when the scripture cannot be understood textually. Using a descriptive-analytic and critical approach, this study showed that the conception of Auda’s maqÄá¹£id could solve the problem. First, in these terms, Auda offers a way of reading the scripture based on the intent in applying Islamic law and its implications when maqÄá¹£id is a primary consideration in reading and applying the law. Second, the theoretical approach as a result of Auda's academic research is the validation of several ijtihad methodologies which will practically produce the Anthropocentric MaqÄá¹£id, namely the MaqÄá¹£id model considering the development of world governance thinking within the framework of nation-states on the one hand, and making human values such as freedom, equality, justice, democracy as a source of maá¹£laḥah on the other. The logical consequence of this Anthropocentric MaqÄá¹£id idea necessitates drawing legal conclusions (istinbath al-ahkam) based on maá¹£laḥah, no longer on the text.

References

AbÅ« Zayd, Nashr HÄmid. MafhÅ«m Al-Nash, DirÄsah FÄ« ”˜UlÅ«m al-Qur’Ä€n. Beirut: Markaz as-SaqÄfÄ« al-”˜ArÄbÄ«, 1994.

A. Ghasemi, M. Taghinejad, A. Kabiri and M. Imani. “Ricoeur’s Theory of Interpretation: A Method for Understanding Text (Course Text).” World Applied Sciences Journal 15 (11) (2011): 1623”“29.

Abdulrahman M.A.Albelahi, A. Ali, Faten Mohmed, and Metwally Ali. “The Theory of Interpretation in Solving Contemporary Legal Issues: With A Focus on the Instrument of Ijtihad.” MATEC Web of Conferences 150 05056 (2018): 1-8.

As-Syathibi, Abu Ishaq. Al-Muwafaqat Fi Ushuli as Syariah Juz II. Beirut: Daar al-Kutub al-”˜Ilmiyyah, 2002.

Azmi, Ahmad Shazrin Mohamed., Noor Rosly Hanif, Siti Mashitoh Mahamood and Siti Nadiah Mohd Ali, “Synthesizing the Maqasid Al-Syariah for the Waqf Property Development.” IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 385 (2019): 3.

Al-BughÄ, MushthafÄ Dib. UshÅ«l Al-TasyrÄ«’ al-IslÄmÄ«: Atsar al-Adillah al-Mukhtalif FÄ«hÄ. BeirÅ«t: DÄr al-Qalam, 1993.

Al-GhazÄlÄ«, AbÅ« HÄmid. Al-MustashfÄ FÄ« ”˜Ilm al-UshÅ«l, Ed. Mohammed Abdul Salam Abdul Shafi, 1st Ed. BeirÅ«t: DÄr al-Kutub al-”˜Ilmiyah, 1413.

Al-JuwainÄ«, Imam al-Haramain. Al-BurhÄn FÄ« UshÅ«l al-Fiqh, Juz I. Beirut: DÄr al-Kutub al-”˜Ilmiyah, 1997.

Al-QardhÄwÄ«, YusÅ«f. Al-IjtihÄd al-Mu’Äshir. Cairo: DÄr al-TawzÄ«’ wa al-Nashr al-IslÄmiyyah, 1994.

___________. Fiqh Al-ZakÄh. Egypt: al-RisÄlah, 1985.

Al-TurÄbÄ«, Hasan. Al-TafsÄ«r al-TawhÄ«dÄ« . I St Ed., Vol., 1. London: DÄr. Al-SÄqÄ«, 2004.

Amrullah, M. Nova Burhanuddin dan Muhammad. “Bedah Karya Agung Imam Al-Shatibi (Mendedah Yang Monumental Dalam al-Muwaafaqat).” In Gerbong Pemikiran Islam, Mengenal Karya Monumental Ushul Fikih Sejak al-Syafi’i Hingga al-Syaukani, 178. Mesir: an-Nahdlah Press, 2015.

Auda, Jasser. MaqÄshid Al-SharÄ«’ah as Philosophy of Islamic Law: A Systems Approach. London and Washington: The International Institute of Islamic Thought, 2008.

Auda, Jasser. “A Maqasidi Approach to Contemporary Application of the Shariah.” Intellectual Discourse Vol. 9, no. No. 2: (2011): 193”“217.

Biltaji, Mohammad. Manhaj ”˜Umar Ibn al-KhaththÄb FÄ« al-TashrÄ«. Cairo: DÄr al-SalÄm, 2002.

Dakir, Jawiah and Faisal Ahmad Shah. “A Contextual Approach in Understanding The Prophet’s Hadith: An Analysis.” Journal of Applied Sciences Research 8(7), no. 3176”“3184 (2012): 3176.

Ghazali, Muhammad Said. “Al-Manhaj al-Istinbathi Bi Tahqiq al-Manath Wa Astarihi Fi Tanzil al-Ahkam.” Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam Vol.9, No. 2, no. 415”“441 (Desember 2020): 415.

Hallaq, Wael. B. A History of Islamic Legal Theories: An Introduction to Sunni Ushul al-Fiqh. Cambridge: CUP, 1997.

Ibrahim, Duski. Membongkar Konsep Istiqra’ Ma’nawi as-Syatibi. Yogyakarta: Ar-Ruzz Media, 2008.

Islam, Muhammad Hifdil. “Islam and Civilization (Analysis Study on the History of Civilization in Islam.” Jurnal Al-Insyiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 5, no. No. 1 (March 2019): 22”“39.

Jughaim, Numan. Thuruq Al-Kashf ”˜an MaqÄshid al-ShÄri.’ International Islamic University Malaysia: DÄr al-NafÄ’is, 2002.

Lewis, Bernard. What Went Wrong? The Clash Between Islam and Modernity in the Middle East. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.

M. M. Muhammed, O. Khuzaima. “21st Century Islam: Global Challenges of Islamic Representation and Knowledge Acquisition.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Vol:13, no. No:2: (2019): 177”“80.

MA Lin and Jaap van Brake. “On the Interpreter’s Choices: Making Hermeneutic Relativity Explicit.” Dao 17 (4) (December 2018): 455”“78.

Makdisi, John. “A Reality Check on IstihsÄn as A Method of Islamic Legal Reasoning.” UCLA Journal of Islamic and Near Eastern Law, no. 99 (2003).

Ramle, Muhamad Rozaimi and Miftachul Huda. “Between Text and Context: Understanding H. Ad¯Ä±th through Asbab al Wurud.” Religions 13/92, no. 1”“19 (2022): 5”“6.

Sookhdeo, Patrick. “Issues of Interpreting the Koran and Hadith.” The Quarterly Journal Vol. 5, no. No. 3: (Winter 2006): 57”“59.

Saeed, Abdullah and Ali Akbar. “Contextualist Approaches and the Interpretation of the Qur’an.” Religions 12/527, no. 1”“11 (2021): 1”“7.

Sanuri. “The Shifting Paradigm of the Classical Theory of Maqashid Al-Shariah to the Modern Theory.” Conference Proceeding s: Annual Conference on Islamic Studies (AICIS XII), n.d., 506-507.

Sule, Babayo., Muhammad Aminu Yahaya and Rashid Ating. “Globalisation and the Muslim Ummah: Issues, Challenges, and the Ways Out.” IIUM Journal of Religion and Civilisational Studies (IJECS) 1/1 (2018): 7”“29.

Syahrur, Muhammad. The Qur’an, Morality, and Critical Reason: The Essential Muhammad Syahrur. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2009.

Zaprulkhan. “Maqashid Al-Shariah in The Contemporary Islamic Legal Discourse: Perspective of Jasser Auda.” Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol. 26, no. No.2: (2018): 445”“72.

Downloads

Published

2022-06-26

How to Cite

Sulaiman Jamrozi, A. S., Fikriawan, S., Anwar, S., & Ardiansyah, M. (2022). Maqāṣid al-SharÄ«a in the Study of Hadith and its Implication for the Renewal of Islamic Law: Study on Jasser Auda’s Thought. Justicia Islamica, 19(1), 74–93. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i1.3269

Issue

Section

Articles