The Justice Orientation in the Court Decree: The Judge Legal Reasoning in Compensation Imposition of Musharakah Agreement
Abstract views: 221
,
PDF downloads: 214
Abstract
This research explores the law consideration used as the foundation of the appearance of the obligation of compensation due to default in the musharakah verdict agreement. In practice, the bias between Islamic and conventional banks often occurs, especially regarding the musharakah agreement, which is sometimes interpreted as a debt agreement, as commonly occurs in traditional banks. Using a normative law research approach, the writer analyzes the internal works of law standards by using decisions of the first level of Religious Courts judges and the cassation level as the object. Based on the analysis, there are two types of law approaches of the judges: formal justice and substantive justice. The judges at the first level of the judiciary used a traditional method by comparing the sound of agreement and the facts of the court. Meanwhile, the substantive justice approach was taken from the cassation level judges who consider not only the agreement's validity but also the agreement's substantial. In this case, the judges on the cassation level managed to explore the substance of equality and partnership principles in the Musharakah agreement. Considering the precautionary principle in the implementation of financing by Islamic banking and the legal relation between the participants of the musharakah agreement, the deficiencies in this agreement will be burdened to each party as the fund deposited proportionally. This research contributes to the conflict resolutions of the Musharakah agreement proportionally
References
Agustiar, Memet. “Musyarakah Mutanaqishah (Diminishing Partnership) Pada Pembiayaan Perumahan.” Jurnal Muamalat Indonesia - Jmi 1, no. 2 (2021).
https://doi.org/10.26418/jmi.v1i2.50643.
Al-Jaziri, Abdurrahman. Al-Fiqh ’ala al-Madzahib al-Arba’ah. Beirut: Dar al-Kutub al-Ilmiyyah, 2003.
Al-Mishri, Rafiq Yunus. Fiqh Al-Muamalat al-Maliyah. Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam, 2007.
Amin, A, and M W Abdullah. “Musyarakah Mutanaqishah, Innovative Product for Islamic Banking Financing in Indonesia.” International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology 5, no. 12 (2020): 374–80.
Antonio, Muhammad Syafi’i. Bank Syariah; Dari Teori Ke Praktik. Jakarta: Gema Insasi Press, 2001.
Anwar Khan, Azam, Saqib Ghias, and Syed Irfan Hyder. “Islamic Banking Prospects, Challenges, and Criticism Systematic Literature Review.” Journal of Accounting and Finance in Emerging Economies 7, no. 4 (2021): 921–30.
Arfa, Faisar Ananda, and Watni Marpaung. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.
Arfan, Abbas, and Iklil Athroz Arfan. “A Strategy for Strengthening Public Perception Toward Sharia Banking.” Banks and Bank Systems 16, no. 2 (2021): 170–81. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.16(2).2021.16.
Armansyah. Hukum Perikatan (Akad) Dalam Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2022.
Arto, A.Mukti. Mencari Keadilan; Kritik Dan Solusi Terhadap Praktek Perkara Perdata Di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2001.
Ashsiddiqqy, Muhammad Rafi, Hilda Monoarfa, and Aneu Cakhyaneu. “Implementation of Aqad Musyarakah Mutanaqisah (MMQ) Take Over Financing on KPR Products in Sharia Banks.” Review of Islamic Economics and Finance 1, no. 1 (2020): 32–42. https://doi.org/10.17509/rief.v1i1.23745.
Asiyah, Binti Nur, M. Ridlwan Nasir, and Muhamad Ahsan. “Islamic Prudential Banking Concept to Reduce Non-Performing Financing: Literature Review.” Iqtishadia 12, no. 2 (2019): 173. https://doi.org/10.21043/iqtishadia.v12i2.5641.
’Atiqi, Muhammad Ubaidillah. ’Uqud al-Syarikat; Dirasah Fiqhiyyah Muqaranah Ma’a Muujaz Fi al-Qanun al-Kuwaiti. Kuwait: Maktabah Ibnu Katsir, 1996.
Departemen Perbankan Syariah OJK. Standar Produk Perbankan Syariah; Musyarakah Dan Musyarakah Mutanaqishah. Jakarta: Otoritas Jasa Keuangan, 2016.
Dewanto, Pandu. “Rekonstruksi Pertimbangan Hakim Terhadap Putusan Sengketa Perdata Berbasis Nilai Keadilan.” Jurnal Ius Constituendum 5, no. 2 (2020): 303. https://doi.org/10.26623/jic.v5i2.2307.
Fajar, Mukti, and Yulianto Achmad. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Penelitian Hukum Empiris. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2010.
Hammad, Nazih. Fi Fiqh Al-Mua’amalat al-Mu’amalah al-Mashrafiyyah al-Mu’ashirah; Qira’ah Jadidah. Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam, 2007.
Hariyanto, Erie. “Public Trust in the Religious Court to Handle Dispute of Sharia Economy.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 22, no. 1 (2022): 185–208.
https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v22i1.26216.
Hasanudin, Maulana, and Jaih Mubarak. Perkembangan Akad Musyarakah. Jakarta: Kencana, 2012.
Hernoko, Agus Yudha. Hukum Perjanjian; Asas Proporsionalitas Dalam Kontrak Komersial. Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group, 2010.
Hidayah, Nur, and Abdul Azis. “Implementation Of Progressive Law In Sharia Banking Dispute Settlement: Case Study of Religious Court Decisions in Indonesia.” Ulumuna 27, no. 1 (2023): 227–57.
H.S., Salim. Hukum Kontrak; Teori Dan Teknik Penyusunan Kontrak. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2010.
Husein, Muh Turizal. “Telaah Kritis Akad Musyarakah Mutanaqisah.” Al Maal: Journal of Islamic Economics and Banking 1, no. 1 (2019): 79.
https://doi.org/10.31000/almaal.v1i1.1775.
Iswanto, Bambang, and Miftah Faried Hadinatha. “Sharia Constitutionalism: Negotiating State Interests and Islamic Aspirations in Legislating Sharia Economic Law.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 23, no. 1 (2023): 235–58.
https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v23i1.32899.
Jahar, Asep Saepudin. “Bureaucratizing Sharia in Modern Indonesia: The Case of Zakat, Waqf and Family Law.” Studia Islamika 26, no. 2 (2019): 207–45. https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v26i2.7797.
Khan, Feisal. “How ‘Islamic’ Is Islamic Banking?” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 76, no. 3 (2010): 805–20.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.09.015.
Khaujah, Izzuddin Muhammad. Nazhariyyah Al-Aqd Fi al-Fiqh al-Islamiy. Jeddah: Majmu’ah Dallah al-Barakah, 1993.
Luthan, Salman, and Muhamad Syamsudin. Kajian Putusan-Putusan Hakim Untuk Menggali Keadilan Substantif Dan Prosedural. Yogyakarta: Direktorat Penelitian Universitas Islam Indonesia Yogyakarta, 2013.
Majeed, Muhammad Tariq, and Abida Zainab. “How Islamic Is Islamic Banking in Pakistan?” International Journal of Islamic and Middle Eastern Finance and Management 10, no. 4 (2017): 470–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMEFM-03-2017-0083.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Penemuan Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2009.
Muhammad, Hasanuddin. “Efektifitas Dan Efisiensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Peradilan Agama.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 7, no. 1 (2020): 35.
https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v7i1.3192.
Nouman, Muhammad, Karim Ullah, and Saleem Gul. “Why Islamic Banks Tend to Avoid Participatory Financing? A Demand, Regulation, and Uncertainty Framework.” Business & Economic Review 10, no. 1 (2018): 1–32.
https://doi.org/10.22547/ber/10.1.1.
Nugraheni, D. “Asas Kesetaraan Dalam Akad Pembiayaan Musyarakah Pada Bank Syariah Di Yogyakarta.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 22, no. 1 (2010): 127–39.
Otoritas Jasa Keuangan. Financial Services Authority Regulation Number 42/POJK.03/2017 concerning the Obligation to Prepare and Implement Credit or Bank Financing Policies for Commercial Banks (2017).
Putra, Panji Adam Agus. “Konsep Perbuatan Melawan Hukum Perspektif Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.” Gorontalo Law Review 4, no. 1 (2021): 57–74.
Rosidah, Zaidah Nur, and Lego Karjoko. “Orientasi Filosofis Hakim Pengadilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 28, no. 1 (2021): 163–82. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol28.iss1.art8.
Sabiq, Sayyid. Fiqh Al-Sunnah. Beirut: Dar al-Fikr, 1983.
Sa’diyah, Mahmudatus, and Nur Aziroh. “Musyarakah Dalam Fiqih Dan Perbankan Syariah.” Equilibrium 2, no. 2 (2014): 310–27.
Suadi, Amran. Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah; Penemuan Dan Kaidah Hukum. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2018.
Subekti, R. Hukum Perjanjian. Jakarta: Pembimbing Masa, 1970.
Sutiyoso, Bambang. “Mencari Format Ideal Keadilan Putusan Dalam Peradilan.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 17, no. 2 (2010): 217–32. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol17.iss2.art5.
Yunanto, Yunanto. “Menerjemahkan Keadilan Dalam Putusan Hakim.” Jurnal Hukum Progresif 7, no. 2 (2019): 192. https://doi.org/10.14710/hp.7.2.192-205.
Copyright (c) 2023 Deni Purnama, Asmuni Asmuni, Dhiauddin Tanjung
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
.png)
