Social Justice and Humanity on Polygamous Marriage at the Religious Court of Pasuruan, Indonesia
Abstract views: 324
,
PDF downloads: 181
Abstract
Polygamy can be granted if it meets one of the alternative conditions and the absolute cumulative condition. However, sometimes alternative terms are used as wrappers for other reasons to look ridiculous, such as humanity. This paper examines three polygamy rulings at the Pasuruan Religious Court in 2019 using the three Indonesia Women Ulama Congress (KUPI) fatwa approaches ma’ruf, mubadalah, and ultimate justice. The article finds that the reason for public justice is used to wrap up humanitarian reasons. In the ma’ruf approach, the standard of public justice as the basis for judges' consideration needs to be more precise because it does not refer to the global public experience. These standards are not in harmony with the decent logic of women in general. The Mubadalah approach ensures a balanced interpretation and interplay of public justice and humanity. The judge’s reasoning for considering standards of public justice and humanity based on patriarchal paradigms deserves to be criticized. The ultimate justice approach illustrates that the judge's reasoning is not based on women's biological, sociological, and anthropological life experiences in the case of polygamy. Using justice and justifying humanitarian reasons in some polygamy rulings in the Pasuruan Religious Court does not yet have a solid basic legal paradigm
References
Al-Khin, Mustofa, Mustofa Al-Bugho, and Ali Asy-Syarbaji. Al-Fiqh Al-Manhajiy ’ala Madhhab Al-Imam Ash-Shafi’iy. Damaskus: Dar al-Qalam, 1992.
Anggraeni, Mustika, Dwi Kurnia, and Ahdiana Yuni Lestari. “Pertimbangan Hakim Terkait Penolakan Permohonan Poligami” 4, no. 1 (2022): 51–66.
Aprilia, Mega Dwi. “Motif Poligami Dengan Wanita Pekerja Seks Komersial Eks. Lokalisasi Moroseneng Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 07, no. 02 (2017): 138–62.
Arto, Mukti. Penemuan Hukum Islam Demi Mewujudkan Keadilan: Penerapan Penemuan Hukum, Ultra Petita, Dan Ex Officio Hakim Secara Proporsional. Edited by 1. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 2018.
Auda, Jasser. Wanita Dan Masjid. Jakarta: Amzah, 2015.
Az-Zuhayliy, Wahbah. Al-Fiqhu Al-Islamiy Wa Adillatuhu. Damaskus: Dar a-Fikr, 1985.
Aziz, Nasaiy, and Nor Syahida Binti Ahmad Ramlan. “Ketidakadilan Suami Yang Berpoligami Dalam Memberi Nafkah Sebagai Alasan Cerai Gugat (Analisis Putusan Mahkamah Syariah Bentong Pahang Nomor Kasus Mal No.04300-76-0217).” Gender Equality 1, no. 2 (2015): 95–114.
Basri, Helmi. Toeri Maalatul Af’all: Solsui Problematikan Kontemporer Dalam Bingkai Maqashid Syari’ah. Jakarta: kencana, 2021.
Farid, Mohtazul, and Medhy Aginta Hidayat. “Perlawanan Perempuan Pesantren Terhadap Poligami Kiai Di Madura.” Edukasi Islam 10, no. 2 (2021): 992–1009. https://doi.org/10.30868/ei.v10i02.1805.
Hadi, Mukhammad Nur. “Conservative Muslim on The Screen: The Narrative of Islamic Family Law in Indonesian Films” 18, no. 1 (2021): 133–45.
Hadi, Mukhammad Nur, Latifatul Islamiyah, and Cecep Soleh Kurniawan. “Conservatism on Islamic Legal Maxims: Judicial Interpretation of Polygamous Marriage at the Religious Courts of Mojokerto, Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Law 4, no. 2 (2023): 168–92. https://doi.org/10.24260/jil.v4i2.1637.
Harisudin, M Noor. “The Formulation of Fiqh Nusantara in Indonesia.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 21, no. 1 (2021): 39–57. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.39-57.
Khoirul Abror. “Poligami Dan Relevansinya Dengan Keharmonisan Rumah Tangga (Studi Di Kelurahan Rajabasa Bandar Lampung).” Al-´Adalah 13, no. 2 (2016): 227–38.
Kodir, Faqihuddin Abdul. Metodologi Fatwa KUPI: Pokok-Pokok Pikiran Musyawarah Keagamaan Kongres Ulama Perempuan Indonesia. Cirebon: KUPI, 2022.
———. Qira’ah Mubadalah: Tafsir Progresif Untuk Keadilan Gender Dalam Islam. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2019.
———. Sunnah Monogami: Mengaji Al-Qur’an dan Hadis. Yogyakarta: Umah Sinau Mubadalah, 2019.
Lahati, Teddy. “Ketidakadilan Gender Putusan Izin Poligami (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Agama Limboto Tahun 2013-2016).” Jurnal Farabi (Pemikiran Konstruktif Bidang Filsafat Dan Dakwah) 18, no. 2 (2018): 14–26.
Majidah, Muthi’ani Uswatul. “Pemenuhan Nafkah Pada Keluarga Poligami Perspektif Hukum Islam (Studi Kasus Di Desa Temboro Dan Desa Kuwon Kecamatan Karas Kabupaten Magetan).” Institut Agama Islam Ponorogo, 2020.
Muhammad, Husein. Poligami: Sebuah Kajian Kritis Kontemporer Seorang Kiai. Yogyakarta: IRCiSoD, 2020.
Nurdiansyah, Firman. “Pendapat Muhammad Syahrur Tentang Poligami Serta Relevansinya Bagi Rencana Perubahan KHI.” Al-Hukama: The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 8, no. 2 (2018): 354–78. https://doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2018.8.2.354-378.
Nurlaelawati, Euis. Expansive Legal Interpretation and Muslim Judges’ Approach to Polygamy in Indonesia. Hawwa. Vol. 18, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1163/15692086-12341380.
Nurmila, Nina, and Linda Rae Bennett. “The Sexual Politics of Polygamy in Indonesian Marriages.” In Sexuality, Culture and Health Series, edited by Linda Rae Bennett and Sharyn Graham Davies, 69–87. New York: Routledge, 2015.
Nuroniyah, Wardah, Didi Sukardi, and Hifny Faqih. “Persepsi Hakim Mengenai Adil Sebagai Syarat Permohonan Izin Poligami Di Pengadilan Agama Kota Cirebon.” Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (2018): 258–72.
Oktasari, Megawati. “Persepsi Perempuan Yang Dipoligami (Studi Komunikasi Interpersonal Pada Masyarakat Kecamatan Sagulung Kota Batam).” Institut Ilmu Al-Qur’an Jakarta, 2022.
Purwanto, Muhammad Roy, Tamyiz Mukharrom, M. Roem Syibly, and Ahmad Nurozi. “Polygamy in Muslim Countries: A Comparative Study in Tunisia, Saudi Arabia, and Indonesia.” Proceedings of the 2nd Southeast Asian Academic Forum on Sustainable Development (SEA-AFSID 2018) 168 (2021): 435–37. https://doi.org/10.2991/aebmr.k.210305.082.
Ridho, Moh Nailor, and Kudrat Abdillah. “Implikasi Poligami Terhadap Kerukunan Keluarga Di Kecamatan Pragaan Kabupaten Sumenep.” An-Nawazil 5, no. 1 (2023): 1–29.
Rismawati, Shinta Dewi. “Persepsi Poligami Di Mata Perempuan Pekalongan.” Muzawah 6, no. 2 (2014): 249–63.
Rohman, Arif. “Reinterpret Polygamy in Islam : A Case Study in Indonesia.” International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention 2, no. 10 (2012): 68–74.
Rohmatulloh, Muhammad Rifqi. “Pemberian Hak Nafkah Istri Oleh Suami Yang Poligami (Studi Kasus Pada Pasangan Y Dan W Yang Poligami Di Desa Linggar Kecamatan Rancaekek).” Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, 2022.
Romli, Dewani. “Persepsi Perempuan Tentang Poligami (Studi Pada Badan Musyawarah Organisasi Islam Wanita Indonesia Provinsi Lampung).” Al-’Adalah 13, no. 1 (2016): 117–26.
Taroreh, Nusri, and Ahmad Rajafi. “Persepsi Pimpinan Badan Kontak Majelis Taklim, Aisyiah, Wanita Syarikat Islam, Fatayat NU, Dan Kerukukan Wanita Islam Di Kota Manado Tentan Poligami.” ADHKI: Journal of Islamic Family Law 1, no. 2 (2019): 137–48.
Thalita, Malpha Della. “Studi Kasus Keluarga Poligami Di Daerah Istimewa Yogyakarta” 16, no. 1 (2019): 184–97.
Wahyuni, Sri. “Legal Transplant: Influence of the Western Legal System in the Muslim Countries.” Justicia Islamica: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial 19, no. 1 (2022): 21–37. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v19i1.2756.
Copyright (c) 2023 Mukhammad Nur Hadi, Faridatus Syuhadak, Faridatus Syuhadak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
.png)
