Maqashid’s Lens on Checks and Balances of Simultaneous Elections in Indonesia
Abstract views: 42
,
PDF downloads: 35
Abstract
This study aimed to explore the principle of checks and balances using the results of simultaneous elections from the perspective of Maqashid al-Syariah. This study is legal research with a normative, comparative, and conceptual approach. According to the findings of this study, the scope of maqashid al-sharia has been considered in the control of state life (maqashid al-siyasah) as part of the development of current maqashid studies. In implementing checks and balances, the nation's interests (hifdz al-ummah) are the main objective of consolidating executive and legislative institutions after simultaneous elections. A government will function effectively if the elected president receives support from a broad coalition in parliament; if he receives just minority support in parliament, the government will face political challenges and become unstable. As a result, institutional ties must be strengthened to offer checks and balances based on maqashid siyasi. This study adds to the implementation of checks and balances based on performance and the interests of the people, rather than political sentiment, to develop friendly governance following the simultaneous elections.
References
Al-Fatih, Sholahuddin, and Fitria Esfandiari. “Presidential Threshold in Indonesian Election: An Islamic Law Perspective.” Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 5, no. 1 (January 20, 2022): 55–69. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v5i1.14145.
Andrian, Rizky, Ramadhan Pulungan, Lita Tyesta. “Mekanisme Pelaksanaan Prinsip Checks and Balances Antara Lembaga Legislatif Dan Eksekutif Dalam Pembentukan Undang-Undang Dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Indonesia.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 4, no. 2 (2022).
Anggara, Vanni. “Dinamika Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Transformative 5, no. 2 (2019): 17–36. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.transformative.2019.005.02.2.
Ansori, Saiful. “Maqashid Syariah Dan Praktik Sistem Presidential Threshold Di Indonesia:” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan, Dan Ekonomi Islam 12, no. 1 (2020): 64–78. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v12i1.1539.
Bactiar. “Esensi Paham Konsep Konstitualisme Dalam Konteks Penyelenggaraan Sistem Ketatanegaraan.” Jurnal Surya Kencana Satu : Dinamika Masalah Hukum Dan Keadilan 6, no. 1 (2016): 122. https://doi.org/10.32493/jdmhkdmhk.v6i1.342.
Casmi Arrsa, Ria. “Pemilu Serentak Dan Masa Depan Konsolidasi Demokrasi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 3 (2014): 169.
Chandranegara, Ibnu Sina. “Architecture of Indonesia's Checks and Balances.” Constitutional Review 2, no. 2 (2016).
Fudin, Hanif. “Aktualisasi Checks and Balances Lembaga Negara: Antara Majelis Permusyawaratan Rakyat dan Mahkamah Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 19, no. 1 (2022): 202. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1919.
Hakim, Himas. “Prinsip Konstitusionalisme Dalam Piagam Madinah Dan Relevansinya Bagi Konstitusi Indonesia.” Journal of Islamic Law Studies 2, no. 2 (2019): 41–61.
Hamid, Asrul, and Dedisyah Putra. “The Practice of Buying and Selling During Friday Prayer in Mandailing District Natal: A Study With A Maqashid Al-Syari’ah Approach.” Samarah 5, no. 2 (2021): 1021–43. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i2.7575.
Hamim, Khairul. “Hifz Al-Lisān As Maqasid Al-Sharl’ah Al-Darūriyyah (Its Importance and Relevance in the Contemporary Era).” Samarah 5, no. 1 (2021): 317–37. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v5i1.9139.
Hayat. “Korelasi Pemilu Serentak Dengan Multi Partai Sederhana Sebagai Penguatan Sistem Presidensial.” Jurnal Konstitusi 11, no. 3 (2014): 468–91.
Holcombe, Randall G. “Checks and Balances: Enforcing Constitutional Constraints.” Economies 6, no. 57 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/economies6040057.
Hosen, Nadirsyah. “Checks and Balances Mechanism in Islamic Constitutionalism: A Critical Reflection.” Journal of Islamic Studies and Culture 7, no. 2 (2019): 26–38. https://doi.org/10.15640/jisc.v7n2a4.
Isra, Saldi. “Hubungan Presiden Dengan DPR.” Jurnal Konstitusi 10, no. 3 (2013): 399–416.
———. Pergeseran Fungsi Legislasi Menguatnya Model Legislasi Parlementer Dalam Sistem Presidensial Indonesia. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 2010.
Isra, Saldi, Fahmi Idris, and Hilaire Tegnan. “Designing a Constitutional Presidential Democracy in Indonesia.” Journal of Politics and Law 13, no. 2 (2020): 22. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v13n2p22.
Jamal, Ridwan. “Maqashid al-Syari’ah dan Relevansinya Dalam Konteks Kekinian” 8, no. 1 (2010): 1–12.
Jayusman, Jayusman, Efrinaldi Efrinaldi, Muhammad Aulia Rachman, and Muhammad Jayus. “The Development of Startup Coop in Indonesia: An Overview Maqashid al-Sharia.” Justicia Islamica 20, no. 1 (2023): 135–54. https://doi.org/10.21154/justicia.v20i1.4884.
Jurdi, Fajlurrahman. “Format Kekuasaan Presiden Dalam UUD NRI 1945 (Relasi Horizontal dan Vertikal Kekuasaan Presiden Dalam Sistem Presidensial).” Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Amanna Gappa 21, no. 1 (2017): 38–59.
Kasdi, Abdurrahman. “Maqashid Syari’ah dan Hak Asasi Manusia (Implementasi Ham Dalam Pemikiran Islam).” Penelitian 8, no. 2 (2014): 247–68.
Lailam, Tanto. “Problem Dan Solusi Penataan Checks and Balances System Dalam Pembentukan Dan Pengujian Undang-Undang Di Indonesia (Problem and Solutions for Arranging of The Checks and Balances System in The Process of Making Law and Constitutional Review in Indonesia).” Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Dan Kesejahteraan 12, no. 1 (2021): 123–42.
Maimunah, Maimunah. “Politik Islam Perspektif Maqashid Syariah.” El-Mashlahah 8, no. 1 (2019): 16–29. https://doi.org/10.23971/el-mas.v8i1.1093.
Manan, Bagir. Membedah UUD 1945. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press, 2012.
Miskari, Miskari. “Politik Hukum Islam Dan Maqasid Al-Syariah.” Al Imarah: Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam 4, no. 1 (2019): 57. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v4i1.2168.
Mulia, Riza. “Marital Beslag Outside Divorce Lawsuit in the Maqashid Syari’ah Perspective.” Samarah 4, no. 2 (2020): 398–415. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i2.7052.
Munadi. “Oposisi Dan Koalisi: Potret Kultur Demokrasi Indonesia.” Resolusi 2, no. 1 (2019): 1–20.
Nasrulloh. “Maqasid Shari’ah Sebagai Pendekatan Sistem Dalam Hukum Islam.” De Jure, Jurnal Syariah Dan Hukum 2, no. 2 (2010).
Pitoy, Hezky Fernando. “Mekanisme Checks and Balances Antara Presiden dan DPR Dalam Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Di Indonesia.” Lex et Societatis II, no. 5 (2014): 5–16.
Ros, Luciano Da, and Matthew M Taylor. “Checks and Balances: The Concept and Its Implications for Corruption.” Revista Direito GV 17, no. 2 (2021): 1–30.
Salameh, Muamar Hasan. “The Principle of Separation of Powers between Sharia and the Positive Law: A Case Study on the Constitutional System of Saudi Arabia.” Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research 162, no. 2 (2017): 387–410.
Santoso, Lukman. “Eksistensi Taqnin Dalam Negara Hukum Modern Dan Relevansinya Dalam Dinamika Legislasi Di Indonesia.” El-Dusturie 2, no. 1 (July 26, 2023). https://doi.org/10.21154/el-dusturie.v2i1.6746.
Saraswati, Retno. “Desain Sistem Pemerintahan Presidensial Yang Efektif.” Mmh 41, no. 1 (2012): 137–43.
Sipayung, Ardhina Shafa. “Maqashid Syari’ah Sebagai Pendekatan Dalam Hukum Islam.” JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Humaniora 9, no. 5 (2022): 2605–16.
Sodikin, Sodikin. “Pemilu Serentak (Pemilu Legislatif Dengan Pemilu Presiden Dan Wakil Presiden) Dan Penguatan Sistem Presidensial.” Jurnal Rechts Vinding: Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional 3, no. 1 (2014): 19. https://doi.org/10.33331/rechtsvinding.v3i1.54.
Solihah, Ratnia. “Peluang Dan Tantangan Pemilu Serentak 2019 Dalam Perspektif Politik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 3, no. 1 (2018): 73. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v3i1.3234.
———. “Peluang Dan Tantangan Pemilu Serentak 2019 Dalam Perspektif Politik.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pemerintahan 3, no. 1 (2018): 73. https://doi.org/10.14710/jiip.v3i1.3234.
Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. “Pemilihan Umum Serentak Yang Berintegritas Sebagai Pembaruan Demokrasi Indonesia.” Jurnal Konstitusi 17, no. 2 (2020): 355. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk1726.
Deddy Supriady Bratakusumah. “Actualization of Checks and Balances between Executive, Legislative and Judicial in Indonesia.” Jurnal Perencanaan Pembangunan: The Indonesian Journal of Development Planning 2, no. 3 (2018): 219–26. https://doi.org/10.36574/jpp.v2i3.47.
Sya’bani, Akmaludin. “Maqasid Al-Syari ’ah Sebagai Metode Ijtihad.” El-Hikam: Journal of Education and Religious Studies VIII, no. 1 (2015): 127–42.
Tribe, Laurence, and Joshua Matz. To End a Presidency: The Power of Impeachment. First Edition. New York, NY: Basic Books, 2018.
Triono. “Menakar Efektivitas Pemilu Serentak 2019.” Jurnal Wacana Politik 2, no. 2 (2017): 156–64. https://doi.org/10.24198/jwp.v2i2.14205.
Wiyanto, Andy. “Pemakzulan dan Pelaksanaan Mekanisme Checks And Balances Dalam Sistem.” Negara Hukum 4, no. 1 (2013): 125–51.
Yasid, Yasid, and Makhshushi Zakiyah. “Perspektif Maqashidus Syari’ah Menyikapi Dinamika Hukum Ketatanegaraan Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum 29, no. 2 (2022): 415–38. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol29.iss2.art9.
Copyright (c) 2023 Muhaimin muhaimin, Sirajul Munir
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
