Contradiction Implications of the Receptie a Contrario Theory in Minangkabau Inheritance
Abstract views: 82
,
pdf downloads: 60
Abstract
This research explores the application of the receptie a contrario theory in its implementation in the inheritance law of the Minangkabau customary society. This research is a normative juridical research with conceptual and philosophical approaches. Data source analysis is conducted on primary legal materials in the form of expert interviews and laws and regulations, and secondary legal materials in the form of research results on Islamic law and customary law. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that the theory of receptie a contrario still applies to inheritance issues in Minangkabau. Although the Minangkabau people are famous for their adherence to customs, they consider breaking customs shameful. However, the Minangkabau community has explicitly stated that their customary inheritance law refers to Islamic inheritance law by recognizing that children and wives are heirs of their parents/husbands. In contrast, previously, the customary heirs recognized were nieces (kemenakan). This research confirms that the application of the receptie a contrario theory still applies to inheritance issues in Minangkabau. In addition, it also contributes to explaining to the broader community that inheritance in Minangkabau, although it adheres to matrilineal kinship lines, has implemented Islamic law.
References
Abadi, Ikrar. “Keluarga Sakinah (Perkawinan Menurut Adat Dan Perubahan Sosial Masyarakat Minangkabau).” Journal al-Ahkam 12, no. 1 (2021): 37–48.
Abbas, Syahrizal. Bunga Rampai Problematika Hukum Kewarisan Islam Kontemporer Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Puslitbang Kehidupan Keagamaan Balitbangdiklat Kemenag, 2012.
———. Mediasi Dalam Hukum Syariah, Hukum Adat, Dan Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Prenada Media, 2017.
Abdullah, Taufik. Studi Adat Sebagai Pantulan Perubahan Sosial Di Minangkabau,” in Alam Terkembang Jadi Guru Adat Dan Kebudayaan Minangkabau, Ed. A. A. Navis, II. Jakarta: Grafiti Pers, 1986.
Achmadi, Ratna Atnawatie, and Maimunah. “The Socialization and the Delivery of Information of the Divisions of Legacy Based on the Law of Civil and The Other Laws in The Village Tumbang Rungan.” PengabdianMu: Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat 2, no. 2 (2017): 63–70. https://doi.org/10.33084/pengabdianmu.v2i2.53.
Afnaini, and M. Syamsudin. “Changes in The Inheritance System of Pusako Tinggi Assets and their Impact on The Minangkabau Traditional Inheritance System.” Prophetic Law Review 4, no. 2 (2022): 223–40. https://doi.org/10.20885/PLR.vol4.iss2.art5.
Ali, Zainuddin. Hukum Islam : Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Islam Di Indonesia. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2006.
Amir, Syarifuddin. Pelaksanaan Hukum Kewarisan Islam Dalam Lingkungan Adat Minangkabau. Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 1984.
Ash-Shiddieqy, Hasbi. Falsafah Hukum Islam. Jakarta: Bulan Bintang, 1975.
Cammack, Mark. “Islamic Inheritance Law in Indonesia: The Influence of Hazairin’s Theory of Bilateral Inheritance.” Studia Islamika 10, no. 1 (2003). https://doi.org/10.15408/sdi.v10i1.639.
Djalil, Basiq. Ilmu Ushul Fiqh (Satu Dan Dua). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group 2014, 2014.
Djawas, Mursyid, Khairuddin Hasballah, Soraya Devy, Muntasir A. Kadir, and Yusfriadi Abda. “The Construction of Islamic Inheritance Law: A Comparative Study of the Islamic Jurisprudence and the Compilation of Islamic Law.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 21, no. 2 (December 30, 2022): 207–19. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v21i2.7495.
Djudiasih, Sonny Dewi, Hazar Kusmayanti, and Deviana Yuanitasari. Pergeseran Norma Hukum Waris Adat. Jatinangor: Unpad Press, 2021.
Eric. “Hubungan Antara Hukum Islam Dan Hukum Adat Dalam Pembagian Warisan Di Dalam Masyarakat Minangkabau.” Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora 3, no. 1 (2019): 61–70. https://doi.org/10.24912/jmishumsen.v3i1.3532.
Fahmi, Chairul. “The Snouck Hurgronje’s Doctrine in Conquering the Holy Revolts of Acehnese Natives.” Heritage of Nusantara: International Journal of Religious Literature and Heritage 10, no. 2 (December 20, 2021): 248–73. https://doi.org/10.31291/hn.v10i2.628.
Flambonita, Suci, and Artha Febriansyah Vera Novianti. “The Concept of Legal Pluralism in Indonesia in The New Social Movement.” Jurnal Analisa Sosiologi 10, no. 2 (2021): 361–73. https://doi.org/10.20961/jas.v10i0.45939.
Griffiths, John. “What Is Legal Pluralism?” The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law 18, no. 24 (1986): 1–55.
Haniru, Rahmat. “Hukum Waris Di Indonesia Perspektif Hukum Waris Islam Dan Hukum Waris Adat.” The Indonesian Journal of Islamic Family Law 4, no. 2 (2014): 457–74.
Irianto, Sulistyowati. Pluralisme Hukum Waris Dan Keadilan Perempuan. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2016.
Irmawati. “Teori Belah Bambu Syahrizal Abbas: Antara Teori Receptie in Complexu, Teori Receptie dan Teori Receptio a Contrario.” Petita: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Syariah 2, no. 2 (2017): 170–86.
Jamil, Rosidi. “Hukum Waris dan Wasiat: Sebuah Perbandingan Antara Pemikiran Hazairin Dan Munawwir Sjadzali.” Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 10, no. 1 (2017): 99–114. https://doi.org/10.14421/ahwal.2017.10108.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, Dede Kania, and Nanik Prasetyoningsih. “Judges’ Acceptance of Sharia-Inspired Laws in Indonesia.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 12, no. 2 (2023): 199–214. https://doi.org/10.24090/mnh.v17i2.7716.
Kusmayanti, Hazar, Dede Kania, Galuh Puspaningrum. “Praktik Beracara Penyelesaian Sengketa Adat Sumatera Barat Berdasarkan Asas Bajanjang Naiak Batanggo Turun.” Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 6, no. 2 (2022): 185–202. https://doi.org/10.24246/jrh.2022.v6.i2.p185-202.
Marlina, Selfia, and Endriyenti. “Intervensi Hukum Islam Terhadap Hukum Kewarisan Adat Minangkabau.” El-Ahli : Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam 4, no. 2 (2023): 1–17.
Mohamad, Rahmat bin, and I Wayan Rideng. “The Legal Pluralism in Law Education in Indonesia.” Sociological Jurisprudence Journal 4, no. 1 (2021): 1–5. https://doi.org/10.22225/scj.4.1.2635.1-5.
MS, Amir. Pewarisan Harato Pusako Tinggi dan Pencaharian. Jakarta: Citra Harta Prima, 2011.
Mubarok, Nafi’. “Living Law dan ’Urf Sebagai Sumber Hukum Positif Di Indonesia.” Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman 11, no. 1 (September 1, 2016): 135–58. https://doi.org/10.15642/islamica.2016.11.1.135-158.
Muhibbuddin, Muhammad. “Pembaruan Hukum Waris Islam Di Indonesia.” Ahkam: Jurnal Hukum Islam 3, no. 2 (2015): 188–98. https://doi.org/10.21274/ahkam.2015.3.2.187-198.
Nasution, Adelina. “Pluralisme Hukum Waris Di Indonesia.” Al-Qadha Jurnal Islam Dan Perundang-Undangan 5, no. 1 (2019): 20–30. https://doi.org/10.32505/qadha.v5i1.957.
Nurhayati. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Hukum Ekonomi Islam.” Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 3, no. 1 (2019): 2–11. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-hes.v3i1.2118.
Penghulu, Idrus Hakimy Dt. Rajo. Pokok-Pokok Pengetahuan Adat Alam Minangkabau. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya, 1994.
Permana, Sugiri. “Implications of Hazairin and Munawir Sjadzali Thoughts In Establishment of Islamic Inheritance In Indonesia.” AHKAM : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 18, no. 2 (July 12, 2018). https://journal.uinjkt.ac.id/index.php/ahkam/article/view/9866.
Prasna, Adeb Davega. “Pewarisan Harta di Minangkabau Dalam Perspektif Kompilasi Hukum Islam.” Kordinat 12, no. 1 (2018): 30–64. https://doi.org/10.15408/kordinat.v17i1.8094.
Putri, Mega Rahmi. “Inheritance of Property in Minangkabau: Review of Customary Law and Islamic Law.” GIC Proceeding, 1, no. 1 (2023): 1–9. https://doi.org/10.30983/gic.v1i1.151.
Rahmi, Dian Novida, Suciati Suciati, and Anindya Bidasari. “Implementasi Mengenai Pembagian Harta Warisan Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam Di Masyarakat Hukum Adat Banjar.” Nomos : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum 1, no. 1 (2021): 1–6. https://doi.org/10.56393/nomos.v1i1.56.
Rana, Mohamad. “Pengaruh Teori Receptie Dalam Perkembangan Hukum Islam Di Indonesia.” Mahkamah: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 3, no. 1 (2018): 17–34.
Riva’i, Ahmad Adri. “Pemikiran Ahmad Khatib dan Abdulkarim Amrullah Tentang Hukum Islam Dan Adat Minangkabau.” Hukum Islam 22, no. 2 (2022): 23–53.
Sakirman. “Konvergensi Pembagian Harta Waris Dalam Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Al-Adalah 13, no. 3 (2016): 156–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.24042/adalah.v13i2.1853.
Santoso, Lukman. “Perbandingan Sistem Civil Law dan Hukum Islam serta Interaksinya dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum 13, no. 2 (2016): 189–222.
Shabana, Ayman. Custom in Islamic Law and Legal Theory: The Development of the Concepts of ’Urf and ’Adah in the Islamic Legal Tradition. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2010. http://www.myilibrary.com?id=306681.
Soekanto, Soerjono, and Sri Mamuji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2013.
Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum dan Jurimetri. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 2010.
Suma, Muhammad Amin. Keadilan Hukum Waris Islam: Dalam Pendekatan Teks Dan Konteks. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2013.
Syarifuddin, Amir. Pelaksanaan Hukum Kewarisan Islam Dalam Lingkungan Adat Minangkabau. Jakarta: Gunung Agung, 1984.
Yasirman. Hukum Keluarga : Karakteristik Dan Prospek Doktrin Islam Dan Adat Dalam Masyarakat Matrelinela Minangkabau. Jakarta: Rajawali Press, 2013.
Yulianti, Amung Ahmad SM, and Fathia Lestari. “Undang-Undang Sumatera Barat (Minangkabau) Tahun 1837-1862.” Historia Madania 4, no. 1 (2020): 31–48.
Copyright (c) 2024 Hazar Kusmayanti, Dede Mulyanto, Deviana Yuanitasari, Muhammadafeefee Assalihee
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
.png)
