Settlement of Sharia Economic Disputes: Efficiency of Implementation in Indonesian Religious Courts
Abstract views: 90
,
pdf downloads: 30
Abstract
This research is a critique of the efficiency of the sources of material law used in the settlement of sharia economic disputes to see how great the urgency is in creating sources of material law that are more specific and can be used as legally binding in sharia economic cases. This research uses descriptive qualitative research methods. The data collection method is done through observation, interviews, and documentation. Furthermore, data analysis was carried out using the methods of data reduction, data display, and conclusion/verification. The results of this study show that the source of material law in the settlement of sharia economic disputes is less efficient because the settlement of defaults and unlawful acts in the field of sharia economics still refers to the Civil Code (KUHPerdata). This finding confirms that there is a legal vacuum in sharia economic disputes, so dispute resolution only focuses on the agreed aspects of the contract, not on the form and practice of the contract. The implication is that the decision made by the judge does not fulfill the interpretative legal theory that adheres to the values of justice, fairness, and procedural due process. Ideally, the resolution of sharia economic disputes should still be based on Islamic law principles as the basis of the function of the Religious Courts. Practically, this research contributes to the conceptual framework of the source of material law in resolving sharia economic disputes in more effective Religious courts, as well as offering a concept of dispute resolution that follows the principles of the Islamic legal system.
References
Adonara, Firman Floranta. “Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Memutus Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi.” Jurnal Konstitusi 12, no. 1 (2015): 1–20.
Alfi, Azizah Nur. “Pelaku Industri Meningkat, Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Terus Bertambah.” Bisnis.com, accessed June 2020. https://finansial.bisnis.com/read/20201023/231/1309054/pelaku-industri-meningkat-perkara-ekonomi-syariah-terus-bertambah.
Atikah, Ika. “Eksistensi Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah (KHES) Sebagai Pedoman Hakim Dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama.” Muamalatuna, Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah 9, no. 2 (2017): 143–62.
Bhakti, Teguh Satya. “Politik Hukum Dalam Putusan Hakim (The Politic of Law in a Verdict).” Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan 5, no. 1 (2017): 53.
Dewi, Ni Made Trisna. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Non Litigasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata.” Jurnal Analisis Hukum 5, no. 1 (2022): 81–89. https://doi.org/10.38043/jah.v5i1.3223.
Dharmaputra, Ngurah Suradatta. “Kritisi Terhadap Teori Hukum Ketiga Ronald Dworkin.” Jurnal Hukum Indonesia 1, no. 1 (2020): 1–10.
Direktorat Jenderal Badan Peradilan Agama. “Rekap Data Jenis Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Peradilan Agama Tahun 2022.” Accessed December 24, 2023. http://kinsatker.badilag.net/JenisPerkara/perkara_persatker/370/2022.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Directory of Decisions,” accessed December 2022. https://putusan3.mahkamahagung.go.id/.
Direktori Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “Decision Number 4/Pdt.G.S/2023/PA.Slw,” 2023.
Draft Kompilasi Hukum Acara Ekonomi Syariah Berubah Menjadi PERMA,” accessed December 2016. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/seputar-ditjen-badilag/seputar-ditjen-badilag/draft-kompilasi-hukum-acara-ekonomi-syariah-berubah-menjadi-perma.
Firdaus, Muhammad Irkham. “Criticism Analysis of The Effectiveness of Indonesia’s Economic Criminal Policy in The Perspective of Islamic Law.” JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) 8, no. September (2022): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.3376/jch.v8i1.570.
Hasibuan, Putra Halomoan. “Proses Penemuan Hukum.” Yurisprudentia 2, no. 2 (2016): 79.
Henlie Fernandes, and Ayu Trisna Dewi. “Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Dalam Penemuan Hukum Baru (Rechtvinding) Tentang Status Anak Luar Kawin.” Jurnal Warta 62, no. 1 (2019): 1–1.
Hermansyah. “10 Tahun, Perkara Ekonomi Syariah Bertambah Lebih Dari 10 Kali Lipat.” Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia, accessed December 2016. https://badilag.mahkamahagung.go.id/seputar-ditjen-badilag/seputar-ditjen-badilag/10-tahun-perkara-ekonomi-syariah-bertambah-lebih-dari-10-kali-lipat.
Hermanto, A. B. “Ajaran Positivisme Hukum di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya.” Jurnal Hukum Dan Bisnis (Selisik) 2, no. 2 (2016). https://doi.org/. https://doi.org/10.35814/selisik.v2i2.650.
Hermanto, Asep Bambang. “Ajaran Positivisme Hukum Di Indonesia: Kritik Dan Alternatif Solusinya.” Selisik 2, no. 4 (2016): 4. http://journal.univpancasila.ac.id/index.php/selisik/article/view/650.
Hudawati, Sinta Noer. “Problematika Hukum Formil Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 1, no. 1 (2020): 17–40. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.1102.
Imani, Yashinta Nurul, Siti Nur Amaliah, Rizki Rivandi Abdul, and Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina. “Analisis Sumber Hukum Formil dan Materil Dalam Pembentukan Hukum Adat Jinayat di Aceh.” Intelektiva 4, no. 10 (2023): 51–56.
Islamiyati, Islamiyati. “Kritik Filsafat Hukum Positivisme Sebagai Upaya Mewujudkan Hukum Yang Berkeadilan.” Law, Development and Justice Review 1, no. 1 (2018): 82–96. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.v1i1.3574.
Isnantiana, Nur Iftitah. “Legal Reasoning Hakim Dalam Pengambilan Putusan Perkara Di Pengadilan.” Islamadina 18, no. 2 (2017): 54.
Collection of Islamic Economic Regulations in Indonesia.” Accessed December 25, 2023. https://www.shariaknowledgecentre.id/id/regulatory-data/regulation/.
Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. “ Compilation of Sharia Economic Law.” Mahkamah Agung, 2011.
Malik, Faissal. “Tinjauan Terhadap Teori Positivisme Hukum Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Undiksha 9, no. 1 (2021): 188–96. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPP/article/view/31488.
Mas’ud, Muhamad. “Konsep Murofa’At Dan Kewenangan Peradilan Agama Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Perbankan Syariah.” Islamika 11, no. 1 (2020): 32–57. https://doi.org/10.33592/islamika.v11i1.418.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Dan Penelitian Hukum. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2004.
Muhammad, Hasanuddin. “Efektifitas Dan Efisiensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Peradilan Agama.” Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 7, no. 1 (2020): 35. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v7i1.3192.
Muhammad Irkham Firdaus, Devid Frastiawan Amir Sup. “Legal Opinion Dalam Perspektif Hukum Islam.” El-Ghiroh: Jurnal Studi Keislman 21, no. 1 (2023): 57–73. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37092/el-ghiroh.v21i1.360.
Muhammad, Wildan Imaduddin. “Keberanjakan Fatwa Dari Legal Opinion Menjadi Legal Binding: (Studi Kasus Fatwa DSN MUI Tentang Perbankan Syariah).” Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-Undangan, Ekonomi Islam 11, no. 2 (2019): 146–63. https://doi.org/10.32505/jurisprudensi.v11i2.996.
Muslimin, Bintang, Evi Hendri Susanto, Fitria Agusti, and Alfin Dani Arwanto. “Efektivitas Khes Dan Fatwa DSN-MUI Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai 6, no. 2 (2022): 8617–31. https://www.jptam.org/index.php/jptam/article/view/3723/3149.
Nashihul Ibad Elhas. “Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah: Tinjauan Umum Hukum Islam.” Jurnal Studi Islam : Qolamuna 1, no. 2 (2016): 213–22. http://ejournal.stismu.ac.id/ojs/index.php/qolamuna/article/view/
Ngutra, Theresia. “Hukum Dan Sumber-Sumber Hukum.” Jurnal Supremasi 11, no. 2 (2016): 193–211.
Norcholis. “Prinsip-Prinsip Syariah Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Di Pengadilan Agama.” Syarikat: Jurnal Rumpun Ekonomi Syariah 4, no. 1 (2021): 22–29. https://doi.org/10.25299/syarikat.2021.vol4(1).8471.
Osman, and Kudrat Abdillah. “Hukum Materiil Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah (Tinjauan Undang-Undang Dan Hukum Islam).” Al-Huquq: Journal of Indonesian Islamic Economic Law 1, no. 1 (2019): 31. https://doi.org/10.19105/alhuquq.v1i1.2646.
Bank Indonesia Regulation No. 11/15/PBI/2009 on the Change of Business Activities of Conventional Banks into Sharia Banks,” 2009.
Prandawa, Muhammad Cahlanang, Hasse Jubba, Fahmia Robiatun MB, and Tri Ulfa Wardani. “Perkembangan Ekonomi Islam Di Indonesia: Antara Peluang Dan Tantangan.” Jurnal Hukum Islam, Ekonomi Dan Bisnis 8, no. 1 (2022): 29–47. https://doi.org/10.30739/istiqro.v8i1.1271.
Ramadhan, Choky. “Konvergensi Civil Law Dan Common Law Di Indonesia Dalam Penemuan Dan Pembentukan Hukum.” Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 30, no. 2 (2018): 213. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.31169.
Rasyid, Abdul, and Tiska Andita Putri. “Kewenangan Lembaga Penyelesaian Sengketa Perbankan Syariah.” Jurnal Yudisial 12, no. 2 (2019): 159. https://doi.org/10.29123/jy.v12i2.256.
Rayfindratama, Alva Dio. “Kebebasan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Di Pengadilan.” Birokrasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Tata Negara 1, no. 2 (2023): 1–17.
Rinaldi, Irfan, Ro’fah Setyowati, and Islamiyati. “Produk Qardh Beragun Emas Secara Syariah Dalam Perspektif Surat Edaran Bank Indonesia No. 147DPbS Pada PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia Syariah Cabang Semarang.” Diponegoro Law Journal 6, no. 1 (2017): 1–15.
Rosita. “Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa (Litigasi Dan Non Litigasi).” Al-Bayyinah: Journal of Islamic Law VI, no. 2 (2017): 85–98.
Ruslaini, and Juhrotul Khulwah. “Ijtihad Hakim Dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah Dilingkungan Peradilan Agama.” Jurnal Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 2 (2017): 150–70.
Sari, Indah. “Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pmh) Dalam Hukum Pidana Dan Hukum Perdata.” Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara 11, no. 1 (2020): 53–70. https://doi.org/10.35968/jh.v11i1.651.
Sarip, Diana Fitriana, and Elya Kusuma Dewi. “Mendudukkan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia Sebagai Doktrin Perundang-Undangan.” Legislasi Indonesia 16, no. 3 (2019): 289–98.
Sebastian, Tainus. “Teori Hukum Interpretatif Menurut Ronal Dwokrin.” Sekolah Tinggi Filsafat Driyarkara, 2016.
Sinaga, Niru Anita, and Nurlely Darwis. “Wanprestasi dan Akibatnya Dalam Pelaksanaan Perjanjian.” Jurnal Mitra Manajemen 7, no. 2 (2015).
Soekanto, Soerjono. Penganlar Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta, 1983.
Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Dan Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta, 2009.
Suherli, Ian Rakhmawan. “Kelemahan Fatwa Dan Implementasinya Dalam Pengembangan Ekonomi Dan Keuangan Kontemporer.” Jurnal Tafaqquh STIS Darul Falah 7, no. 1 (2022): 59–76.
Syarif, Fitrianur. “Perkembangan Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Di Indonesia.” Pleno Jure 8, no. 2 (2019): 1–16. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v8i2.38.
Tamam, Ahmad Badrut. “Kedudukan Fatwa Majelis Ulama Indonesia (MUI) Dan Fatwa Dewan Syariah Nasional (DSN) Dalam Sistem Hukum Indonesia.” Al-Musthofa: Journal of Sharia Economics 04, no. 01 (2021): 1–25. https://ejournal.unuja.ac.id/index.php/hakam/article/view/1368/642.
———. “Konsep Subyek Hukum Dalam Hukum Islam, Hukum Positif dan Kompilasi Hukum Ekonomi Syariah.” Journal of Sharia Economics 1 (2018): 107–17.
Uar, Eka Dahlan. “Legalisasi Dewan Syariah Nasional Dan Komite Perbankan Syariah Dalam Pandangan Fiqhi Ekonomi Perbankan.” Tahkim 9, no. 1 (2013): 106–21.
Law no 21 Tahun 2008 Concerning Sharia Banking, accessed 2008.
Copyright (c) 2024 Muhammad Irkham Firdaus, May Shinta Retnowati, M. Abdurrozaq
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Requirements to be met by the author as follows:
- Author storing copyright and grant the journal right of first publication manuscripts simultaneously with licensed under the CC BY-SA allows others to share the work with a statement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors can enter into the preparation of additional contractual separately for the non-exclusive distribution of a decadent version of the journal issue (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with the recognition of initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) before and during the submission process because it can lead to productive exchanges and citations earlier and more severe than published works. (see The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under CC BY-SA.
.png)
