The Forfeiture of Corruption Assets and the Legal Position of Innocent Third Parties
Normative Challenges and Policy Gaps
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21154/invest.v5i1.10546Keywords:
Asset forfeiture, corruption offenses, economic rights, good faith third parties, legal protectionAbstract
The asset forfeiture of corruption proceeds is essential for recovering state losses and preventing criminals from benefiting economically from their crimes. However, this policy raises legal challenges when assets are in the hands of third parties acting in good faith. This study aims to explore the economic rights of such third parties and examine the legal protection of their rights during the seizure of assets derived from corruption. This study employs a normative juridical approach, utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case analyses. The findings reveal an imbalance between asset forfeiture policies and the principle of justice for third parties who acquire assets legally. Although regulations govern objections from good-faith third parties, practical implementation still faces difficulties in terms of proof and legal interpretation. Thus, this study suggests the need for more detailed regulatory reforms to ensure the fair protection of the economic rights of good-faith third parties while facilitating the recovery of state assets.
References
Ali, Zainuddin. Metode Penelitian Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2021.
Anggara, Arya. “Limitation of Public Service Special Assignment Charges Bond in the Form of a BUMN Persero (State-Owned Enterprises).” Peradaban Hukum Nusantara 1, no. 1 (November 2, 2024): 96–114. https://doi.org/10.62193/ebsdrm65.
Arasistawa, Lalu. “Philosophical and Historical Foundations of the Establishment of Blasphemy Articles in the Criminal Code (KUHP).” Peradaban Hukum Nusantara 1, no. 2 (2024): 66–83. https://doi.org/10.62193/h2vsk889.
Baihaki, Muhammad Reza. “Assessment of Elements of Abuse of Authority (Detournement De Pouvoir) Based on the Decision of the Constitutional Court.” Jurnal Konstitusi 20, no. 1 (March 25, 2023): 100–122. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2016.
Becker, Gary Stanley, and William M Landes. “Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment,” 1974.
Benardy Ferdiansyah. “KPK Sita Aset Nazaruddin Di Jakarta Selatan - ANTARA News.” Accessed April 28, 2025. https://www.antaranews.com/berita/597508/kpk-sita-aset-nazaruddin-di-jakarta-selatan.
Bhargava, Vinay Kumar, and Emil P Bolongaita. Challenging Corruption in Asia: Case Studies and a Framework for Action. World Bank Publications, 2004.
Direktorat Hukum PPATK. Kajian Hukum: Permasalahan Seputar Perampasan Aset Dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 8 tahun 2010 Tentang Pencegahan Dan Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dan Upaya Pengoptimalisasiannya. Direktorat Hukum PPATK, 2021. //all.fh.unair.ac.id%2Findex.php%3Fp%3Dshow_detail%26id%3D22159.
Doss, Cheryl, Caitlin Kieran, and Talip Kilic. “Measuring Ownership, Control, and Use of Assets.” Feminist Economics 26, no. 3 (July 2, 2020): 144–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2019.1681591.
Fajrin, Yaris Adhial, and Ach. Faisol Triwijaya. “Punishment Asset Forfeiture for Corruptor In Perspective of Indonesian Community Justice.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 13, no. 3 (October 4, 2019): 209. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v13no3.1702.
Friedman, Lawrence Meir, and Grant M. Hayden. American Law: An Introduction. New York: Oxford University Press, 2017.
Fuadi, Gumilang, Windy Virdinia Putri, and Trisno Raharjo. “Tinjauan Perampasan Aset Dalam Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang Dari Perspektif Keadilan.” Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Dan Keadilan 5, no. 1 (March 30, 2024): 53–68. https://doi.org/10.18196/jphk.v5i1.19163.
Garner, Bryan A. Black’s Law Dictionary. St. Paul Minn: West Group, 1999.
Guerriero, Carmine. “Property Rights, Transaction Costs, and the Limits of the Market.” Economics of Governance 24, no. 2 (June 1, 2023): 143–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-023-00290-9.
Hadjon, Philipus M. Perlindungan hukum bagi rakyat di Indonesia: sebuah studi tentang prinsip-prinsipnya, penanganannya oleh pengadilan dalam lingkungan peradilan umum dan pembentukan peradilan administrasi negara. Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.
Helfer, Laurence R., Cecily Rose, and Rachel Brewster. “Flexible Institution Building in the International Anti-Corruption Regime: Proposing a Transnational Asset Recovery Mechanism.” American Journal of International Law 117, no. 4 (October 2023): 559–600. https://doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2023.32.
Hodgson, Geoffrey M. “Much of the ‘Economics of Property Rights’ Devalues Property and Legal Rights.” Journal of Institutional Economics 11, no. 4 (December 2015): 683–709. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1744137414000630.
Husein, Yunus. Penjelasan Hukum Tentang Perampasan Aset Tanpa Pemidanaan Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Pusat Studi Hukum dan Kebijakan Indonesia, 2019.
Irwansyah, Irwansyah. “Penelitian Hukum: Pilihan Metode & Praktik Penulisan Artikel.” Yogyakarta: Mirra Buana Media 8 (2020).
Lynch, Kathleen, Manolis Kalaitzake, and Mags Crean. “Care and Affective Relations: Social Justice and Sociology.” The Sociological Review 69, no. 1 (January 1, 2021): 53–71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038026120952744.
Ramadhani, Noni. “RUU Perampasan Aset Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi Oleh KPK: Perspektif Teori Kepentingan Sosial Rescoe Pound.” Indonesian Journal of Law and Justice 2, no. 2 (December 3, 2024): 8. https://doi.org/10.47134/ijlj.v2i2.3387.
Sadeli, Wahyudi Hafiludin. “Implikasi Perampasan Aset Terhadap Pihak Ketiga Yang Terkait Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Program Pasca Sarjana Magister Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2010.
Sutanti, Rahmi, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Nur Rochaeti. “The Urgency of Implementing Non-Conviction-Based Asset Forfeiture in Combating Green Financial Crimes in Indonesia.” In Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Law, Economics and Governance, IWLEG 2022, 27 July 2022, Semarang, Indonesia. Semarang, Indonesia: EAI, 2023. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.27-7-2022.2326300.
Tantimin, Tantimin. “Penyitaan Hasil Korupsi Melalui Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture Sebagai Upaya Pengembalian Kerugian Negara.” Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 5, no. 1 (January 31, 2023): 85–102. https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v5i1.85-102.
Trinchera, Tommaso. “Confiscation And Asset Recovery: Better Tools To Fight Bribery And Corruption Crime.” Criminal Law Forum 31, no. 1 (March 2020): 49–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10609-020-09382-1.
Yuan, Shilin, Haiyang Chen, and Wei Zhang. “Impact of Corruption on Chinese Investment in African Countries.” Chinese Management Studies 16, no. 4 (August 1, 2022): 904–23. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-12-2020-0576.
Yudistira, Aldi. “The Urgency of Reformulating the Material Legality Principle in the Criminal Code Based on Godly Justice.” Peradaban Hukum Nusantara 1, no. 2 (2024): 16–29. https://doi.org/10.62193/fd0rqm06.
Yusuf, Muhammad. “Merampas Aset Koruptor: Solusi Pemberantasan Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Kompas, 2013.
Zen, A Patra M, and LL M SH. Perlindungan Pihak Ketiga Yang Beritikad Baik. Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia, 2021.
Zuhdi, Achmad, and Ari Ade Kamula. “Legitimasi Hukum Asing Sebagai Pertimbangan Putusan Oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi: Perbandingan Antara Indonesia Dan Afrika Selatan.” Yurispruden: Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Malang 7, no. 2 (June 20, 2024): 272–96. https://doi.org/10.33474/yur.v7i2.21634.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Kholilah Delvi Syauqi Huda, Yuliati Yuliati, Bambang Sugiri

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law agrees to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).