Pola Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba Produk Teh Poci Di Ponorogo
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this study is first to find out the pattern of dispute resolution in the franchise practice of Teh Poci, the second is to describe what the ideal pattern should be. In accordance with the characteristics of the existing problems, the most relevant form of approach to analyzing the above problems is empirical legal research. This research sees law as a reality in society, meaning how the law is practiced. The settlement of default on the agreement in the Tea Poci product franchise business in Ponorogo is the cancellation of the contract as a result of default and is settled on the principle of peace, namely by consulting and negotiation techniques. Ideally, under such a mechanism the franchisor should develop an internal procedure for handling complaints. However, this procedure is not stipulated in the franchise agreement and meets certain minimum standards. This standard should provide a procedure for resolving disputes. If a dispute arises, either party can initiate a complaint handling procedure under the Code of Conduct, or under a franchise agreement.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
An author who publishes in the Invest Journal of Sharia & Economic Law agrees to the following terms:
- The author retains the copyright and grants the journal the right of first publication of the work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal;
- The author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book) with the acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal;
- The author is permitted and encouraged to post his/her work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of the published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
References
Association., American Bar, Alternative Dispute Resolution Committee, American Bar Association., and Section of Litigation. “Alternative Dispute Resolution.” Alternative Dispute Resolution., 2011.
Asuan. “Eksistensi Waralaba (Franchise) Menurut Peraturan Pemerintah No. 42 Tahun 2007 Sebagai Perjanjian Innominaat” 13, no. 42 (2017): 260–71.
harlina, yuni. “KAJIAN HUKUM ISLAM TENTANG WANPRESTASI (INGKAR JANJI) PADA KONSUMEN YANG TIDAK MENERIMA SERTIFIKAT KEPEMILIKAN PEMBELIAN RUMAH.” Hukum Islam; Vol 17, No 1 (2017): PROBLEMATIKA HUKUM KELUARGADO - 10.24014/Hi.V17i1.3909 , September 19, 2018. http://ejournal.uin-suska.ac.id/index.php/hukumislam/article/view/3909.
Karamoy, Amir. Percaturan waralaba Indonesia, 2013.
LALALA, EDEN POSTER, I KETUT SUAMBA, and I DEWA AYU SRI YUDHARI. “Analisis Kepuasan Konsumen Pada Produk Waralaba Teh Cap Poci Di Kecamatan Denpasar Selatan Kota Denpasar.” Jurnal Agribisnis Dan Agrowisata (Journal of Agribusiness and Agritourism), January 23, 2017. https://doi.org/10.24843/JAA.2017.v06.i01.p06.
Sourdin, Tania. Alternative Dispute Resolution, 2020.
Widnyana, I Made., and Indonesia. Alternatif penyelesaian sengketa (ADR). Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska bekerja sama dengan BANI (Badan Arbitrase Nasional Indonesia), 2009.
Yuniarti, Rahmi. “Efisiensi Pemilihan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Waralaba.” FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 10, no. 3 (April 3, 2017). https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v10no3.793.