POLITENESS STRATEGY PERFORMED IN SATU JAM LEBIH DEKAT TALK SHOW ON TV ONE: A PRAGMATIC APPROACH

Nur Aini Syah

Abstract


Talk show program on TV One is a program that uses language as a means of communication. To create the success of cummunication, it needs a strategy. This study aims to find out the politeness srategies used in Satu Jam Lebih Dekat talk show on TV One. The method used in this article is descriptive qualitative method. The data source of this research is oral data source, which is focused on the speeches between the presenter, interviewees, and mystery guest with the sources from a number of ministers in our country by downloading on the site www.youtube.com. For data analysis technique, the researcher used the contextual method with the pragmatic competence-in-dividing. And for the theory, the researcher focuses on politeness strategies by Brown Levinson's theory (1987: 94).The results indicate that there are 16 types of politeness strategies of Satu Jam Lebih Dekat program namely Bald on record, Positive Politeness-attend to hearer, Positive Politeness-intensify interest, Positive Politeness-use group identify marker, Positive Politeness-seek agreement, Positive Politeness-avoid disagreement, Positive Politeness-assert speaker’s knowledge, Positive Politeness-include both speaker and hearer in activity, Positive Politeness-give or ask reasons, Positive Politeness-give gifts, Negative Politeness-be conventionally indirect, Negative Politeness-question, hedge, Negative Politeness-give deference, Negative Politeness-impersonalize speaker and hearer, Off record-give hints, and Off record-give association clues. The most dominant use of politeness strategy is positive politeness-asking an agreement with the 42 percentage. The politeness strategies of this speech acts support the effectiveness of talk show and will minimize threats, protect, and extract information from interviewees without any compulsion due to the use of this politeness strategy.


Keywords


pragmatics, politeness strategy, talk show

Full Text:

XML

References


Brown, P., dan Levinson, S. (1987). Politeness Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.

Fotouhi, F., dan Ziyaei, F. (2015). The Role of Politeness Strategies in Writing Emails. Iran: Indian Journal of Fundamental and Applied Life Scieces, vol. 5, no. 1, hlm 5294-5298.

Gil, J.M. (2012). Face-Threatening Speech Act and Face-Invading Speech Act: An Interpretation of Politeness Phenomena. Argentina: International Journal of Linguistics, vol. 4, no.2, hlm 400-411.

Grice, H.P. (1989). Studies in The Way of Words. England: Harvard University Press.

Gunarwan, Asim. (2007). Implikatur dan Kesantunan Berbahasa: Tindak Tutur dan Kesantunan Berbahasa: Beberapa Tilikan Sandiwara Ludruk dalam Yassir Nasanius (Peny). PELLBA 18. Jakarta: Pusat Kajian Bahasa Dan Buadya Unika Atma Jaya.

Leech, Geoffrey. (2011). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik (Terjemahan oleh M.D.D Oka). Jakarta: UI Press.

_____________. (2015). Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik (Terjemahan oleh M.D.D Oka). Jakarta: UI Press.

Mahsun. (2012). Metode Penelitian Bahasa. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Moleong, Lexy J. 2015. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Rahardi, Kunjana. (2005). Pragmatik: Kesantunan Imperatif Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga

_______________ .(2009). Sosiopragmatik Kajian Imperatif dalam Wadah Sosiokultural dan Konteks Situasionalnya. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Santosa, Riyadi. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Kebahasaan. Surakarta: Universitas Sebelas Maret

Searle, J.R. (1969). Speech Act An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

__________. (1985). Foundations of Illocutionary Logic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Spradley, James P. (2007). Metodologi Etnografi. Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana

Sudaryanto. (1993). Metode dan Aneka Teknik Analisis Bahasa: Pengantar Penelitian Wahana Kebudayaan Secara Linguistik. Yogyakarta: Duta Wacana University Press.

Sulaiman, M., dan Khoshaba, L. (2016). Speech Act as a Basic of Understanding Dialogue Coherence with Reference to Engish-Arabic Translation. Macedonia: International Jurnal of Social Science and Humanities, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm 68-98

Timberg, Bernard. (2004). Television A History of The TV Talk show. USA: University of Texas Press

Tripp, S.E., Guo, J., dan Lampert, M. (1990). Politeness and Persuasion in Children’s Control Acts. North-Holland: Journal of Pragmatic, vol. 14, hlm 307-331.

Yule, George. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford: Oxford University Press

Yuliana, R., Rohmadi, M., dan Suhita, R. (2013). Daya Pragmatik Tindak Tutur Dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia pada Siswa Sekolah Menengah Pertama, Basastra: Jurnal Penelitian Bahasa, Sastra Indonesia dan Pengajaranya, vol. 2, no. 1, hlm 1-14.

Zhao, Y., dan Throssell, P. (2011). Speech Act Theory and Its Application to EFL Teaching in China. Tasmania: The International Journal-Language Society and Culture, issue. 32, hlm 88-95.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v2i1.2727

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Indexed by:

  

_________________________________________________________________