Politeness Utterances Analysis of Comment Structure on Adrian Brody’s Oscar Victory in Instagram from BBC News
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v7i1.13144Keywords:
Instagram Comments, Oscar Victory Discourse, Politeness StrategiesAbstract
This study examines politeness and impoliteness strategies in Instagram comments responding to BBC News’ post about Adrian Brody’s Oscar win. Using a qualitative pragmatic approach, the study analyzes user-generated comments and classifies them based on Brown and Levinson’s politeness theory, while sarcastic or ridiculing expressions are interpreted using Culpeper’s impoliteness framework. The data consist of publicly available comments that are relevant to the post and contain analyzable linguistic features, while irrelevant or non-linguistic comments are excluded. The findings reveal four main strategies: positive politeness, negative politeness, bald-on-record, and mock politeness. Positive politeness appears in supportive and congratulatory comments, while negative politeness is used to express criticism in a mitigated manner. Bald-on-record strategies convey direct and often harsh criticism, whereas mock politeness reflects sarcasm through indirect expressions. The results also indicate that users’ responses are influenced by the controversy surrounding Brody’s behavior and by the interactive nature of Instagram, which encourages spontaneous and emotionally driven communication. This study contributes to digital pragmatics by demonstrating how politeness and impoliteness coexist and interact in shaping online discourse.
Downloads
References
Alqarni, M. (2020). Mock impoliteness in Saudi Arabia: Evil eye expressive and responsive strategies. Journal of Pragmatics, 167, 4–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.001
Bi, X., & Marsden, E. (2020a). Managing interpersonal relationships: Teasing as a method of professional identity construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 165, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.003
Bi, X., & Marsden, E. (2020b). Managing interpersonal relationships: Teasing as a method of professional identity construction. Journal of Pragmatics, 165, 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2020.05.003
Chandra, O. H. (2021). Politeness in the Use of Language in Social Media. E3S Web of Conferences, 317, 02027. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202131702027
Culpeper, J. (2021). Impoliteness and hate speech: Compare and contrast. Journal of Pragmatics, (Im)politeness, humour, and the role of intentions: Essays presented to Michael Haugh, 179, 4–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2021.04.019
Fatmawati, F., & Ningsih, R. (2024). Politeness in Expressive Speech Acts: A Cyber Pragmatics Approach. Journal of Languages and Language Teaching, 12(4), 1721. https://doi.org/10.33394/jollt.v12i4.12620
Ferreira, G. B., & Ferreira, L. S. (2025). The Polarization Paradox: Social Media, Young Voters, and the Challenges to the Open Society. Social Sciences, 14(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci14090542
Hirayama, Y., & Matthewson, L. (2022). Evidential-temporal interactions do not (always) come for free. Journal of Pragmatics, 193, 173–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2022.03.004
Kaplan, A. M., & Haenlein, M. (2010). Users of the world, unite! The challenges and opportunities of Social Media. Business Horizons, 53(1), 59–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2009.09.003
Kim, S. J., Villanueva, I. I., & Chen, K. (2024). Going Beyond Affective Polarization: How Emotions and Identities are Used in Anti-Vaccination TikTok Videos. Political Communication, 41(4), 588–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2023.2243852
Kluknavská, A., & Macková, A. (2024). Patterns of Polarizing Communication During COVID-19: Emotionality, Incivility, Conflict, and Negativity in Facebook Posts of Government and Opposition Leaders. International Journal of Communication, 18, 22–22. https://ijoc.org/index.php/ijoc/article/view/21028
Komariah, N., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). The Relation Between Labor Pain with Maternal Anxiety: First International Conference on Health, Social Sciences and Technology (ICOHSST 2020), Palembang, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.210415.043
Ma, Y., & Li, M. (2024). Unpacking translanguaging in refusals on Chinese social media: Strategies, distribution, and functions. Multilingua, 43(4), 487–524. https://doi.org/10.1515/multi-2023-0071
Olusegun Oladele Jegede. (2024). Speech Acts in the Digital Sphere: A Corpus-Based Explora... https://www.degruyterbrill.com/document/doi/10.1515/csh-2024-0023/html
Oteng Acheampong, D., & Kwarteng, M. (2021). A Pragmatic Analysis of Impoliteness in Selected Ghanaian Social Interactions. Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics, 3(3), 32–40. https://doi.org/10.32996/jeltal.2021.3.3.5
Ren, W. (2024). The complexities and dynamics of pragmatics of sharing on social media. Journal of Pragmatics, 233, 100–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2024.09.010
Schwartz, D., Fritz, H. L., Kelleghan, A. R., Ryjova, Y., Omary, A., Taylor, L. M., & Luo, T. (2021). Adolescents who are nonusers of fashionable social networking platforms. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 15(3). https://doi.org/10.5817/CP2021-3-7
Shao, S. P., Yousaf, S., & Kim, J. M. (2026). Digital Nudges for Civility: How Identity Salience Reduces Impolite Language on TikTok. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2026.2633214
Sujon, Z., Dyer, H. T., & Bonow Soares, F. (2025). Social Media and Society: Platforms, Publics, and Anti-Publics. Social Media + Society, 11(3), 20563051251368234. https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051251368234
Tsoumou, J. M. (2023). (Im)politeness on Facebook during the Covid-19 pandemic. Journal of Politeness Research, 19(1), 249–284. https://doi.org/10.1515/pr-2021-0008
Yusuf, A. B., & Resha, F. (2025). CYBERPRAGMATICS OF POLITENESS IN NETIZENS’ COMMENTS ON THE INDONESIAN PRESIDENT’S INSTAGRAM POSTS. Lingue : Jurnal Bahasa, Budaya, Dan Sastra, 7(1), 144–156. https://doi.org/10.33477/lingue.v7i1.9455
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Dinda Arifah Rahmawati
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in ELTALL (English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistics, and Literature Journal) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this license, authors and readers are free to:
- Share. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt. remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
- Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- Non-Commercial. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
Notices:
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
For the full legal code of the license, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
