A Curriculum Design Analysis of English Learning Outcomes in Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v7i1.13681Keywords:
Curriculum Design Analysis, Learning Outcomes, Junior High School, Merdeka CurriculumAbstract
This study analyzes the English Learning Outcomes (Capaian Pembelajaran) for junior high school in Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum to examine how language competencies are conceptualized and what curriculum design orientation they reflect. While the existing research has largely focused on classroom implementation, limited attention has been given to analyzing the learning outcomes document itself as a curriculum product. Adopting qualitative document analysis, the study examines five competency clauses and the accompanying rationales using the framework of language curriculum development. The findings indicate that the Learning Outcomes document functions primarily as a goals-and-skills specification. Learning content is broadly implied in the outcome statements and elaborated in the rationale, while methodological guidance appears only in the rationale through a genre-based approach. Assessment is not specified within the document but is addressed in separate materials, indicating a fragmented distribution of curriculum information. This pattern reflects a backward design orientation combined with partial methodological direction, revealing a tension between outcome-based flexibility and implicit pedagogical guidance. Also, the Learning Outcomes reflect a predominantly functional view of language, supported by structural elements within a genre-based framework. The curriculum ideology is largely learner-centered, with limited evidence of cultural pluralism and no indication of academic rationalism or social reconstructionism. These findings suggest increased interpretive demands on teachers and highlight the need to strengthen curriculum coherence and teacher curriculum design literacy.
Downloads
References
Afriyanti, R., Riza, A., & Sevrika, H. (2024). English Teachers ’ Literacy Toward Learning Outcome in Teaching English Phase a Of Elementary School. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 8(3), 1982–1994. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.7196/http
Antika, R. G., Puspita, S. O. H., & Mariska, T. A. (2024). Literature study : Utilization of technology in the Independent Curriculum teaching process. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 7(3), 1870–1875. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v7i3.92322
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
BSKAP. (2025). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP) Nomor 046/H/KR/2025 tentang Capain Pembelajaran pada Pendidkan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah (Issue 021).
Delany, C., Kosta, L., Ewen, S., Nicholson, P., Remedios, L., & Harms, L. (2016). Identifying pedagogy and teaching strategies for achieving nationally prescribed learning outcomes. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1138450
Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202
Ferdaus, S. A., & Novita, D. (2023). Subject at A Vocational High School in Indonesia. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 8(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v8i2.1201
Gumilar, G., Perdana, D., Rosid, S., & Ghufron, A. (2023). Urgensi penggantian Kurikulum 2013 menjadi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Papeda, 5(2), 148–155. https://e-journal.unimudasorong.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpendidikandasar/article/view/1825/910
Hadi, A., Marniati, Ngindana, R., Kurdi, M. S., Kurdi, M. S., & Fauziah. (2023). New paradigm of Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in schools. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3126
Hartel, R. W., & Foegeding, E. A. (2004). Learning: Objectives, Competencies, or Outcomes? Journal of Food Science Education, 3(4), 69–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2004.tb00047.x
Hunaepi, H., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2024). Transforming education in Indonesia : The impact and challenges of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. Path of Science, 10(6), 5026–5039. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.105-31
Latifa, H., & Ratih, K. (2023). Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in English Language Teaching : A Study of Teacher Learning Steps. Voices of English Language Education Society, 7(3), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i3.24049
Le, M. D., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English primary teacher agency in implementing teaching methods in response to language policy reform: a Vietnamese case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209
Lestari, M. B., Ahyarudin, D. A., Feriyanti, R., Tanjung, P., Awaliyah, L., Rihatmi, & Margana. (2024). Communicative Practices and Cultural Challenges in Kurikulum Merdeka : The District Teachers ’ Voice. EVOLUTIONARY STUDIES IN IMAGINATIVE CULTURE, 8(3), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.1849
Leung, C., & Scarino, A. (2016). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Goals and Outcomes in Language’s Education. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 12300. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12300
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.
Macalister, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Language Curriculum Design (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203763
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (Fourth edi). Jossey-Bass.
Novita, B., Afriyanti, R., & Siska, S. (2023). English Teacher ’ s literacy about Learning Outcomes in the Merdeka Curriculum for Elementary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 8(3), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i3.5973
Nugraha, T. S. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka untuk pemulihan krisis pembelajaran. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v19i2.45301
Nuralawiah, V., Syafrizal, & Baihaqi, A. (2024). An analysis Of the English textbook “English In Mind Second Edition” based on the Merdeka Curriculum. Journal on Education, 06(03), 16046–16056. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i3.5333
Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.
Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293
Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2023). Content and language integrated learning and English medium instruction (L. Wei, Z. Hua, & J. Simpson (eds.)). Routledge.
Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Yuan, R., Liao, W., Wang, Z., Kong, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). How do English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) teachers perceive and engage with critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2020. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101002
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Afiya Ulin Nuha Annafiah, Lestari Setyowati, Siti Muniroh

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published in ELTALL (English Language Teaching, Applied Linguistics, and Literature Journal) are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (CC BY-NC 4.0).
Under this license, authors and readers are free to:
- Share. copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt. remix, transform, and build upon the material
Under the following terms:
- Attribution. You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- Non-Commercial. You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
Notices:
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
- No additional restrictions. You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
For the full legal code of the license, please visit: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/












