A Curriculum Design Analysis of English Learning Outcomes in Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.21154/eltall.v7i1.13681

Keywords:

Curriculum Design Analysis, Learning Outcomes, Junior High School, Merdeka Curriculum

Abstract

This study analyzes the English Learning Outcomes (Capaian Pembelajaran) for junior high school in Indonesia’s Merdeka Curriculum to examine how language competencies are conceptualized and what curriculum design orientation they reflect. While the existing research has largely focused on classroom implementation, limited attention has been given to analyzing the learning outcomes document itself as a curriculum product. Adopting qualitative document analysis, the study examines five competency clauses and the accompanying rationales using the framework of language curriculum development. The findings indicate that the Learning Outcomes document functions primarily as a goals-and-skills specification. Learning content is broadly implied in the outcome statements and elaborated in the rationale, while methodological guidance appears only in the rationale through a genre-based approach. Assessment is not specified within the document but is addressed in separate materials, indicating a fragmented distribution of curriculum information. This pattern reflects a backward design orientation combined with partial methodological direction, revealing a tension between outcome-based flexibility and implicit pedagogical guidance. Also, the Learning Outcomes reflect a predominantly functional view of language, supported by structural elements within a genre-based framework. The curriculum ideology is largely learner-centered, with limited evidence of cultural pluralism and no indication of academic rationalism or social reconstructionism. These findings suggest increased interpretive demands on teachers and highlight the need to strengthen curriculum coherence and teacher curriculum design literacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Afriyanti, R., Riza, A., & Sevrika, H. (2024). English Teachers ’ Literacy Toward Learning Outcome in Teaching English Phase a Of Elementary School. JISIP (Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Pendidikan), 8(3), 1982–1994. https://doi.org/10.58258/jisip.v7i1.7196/http

Antika, R. G., Puspita, S. O. H., & Mariska, T. A. (2024). Literature study : Utilization of technology in the Independent Curriculum teaching process. Social, Humanities, and Educational Studies (SHES): Conference Series, 7(3), 1870–1875. https://doi.org/10.20961/shes.v7i3.92322

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

BSKAP. (2025). Keputusan Kepala Badan Standar, Kurikulum, dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP) Nomor 046/H/KR/2025 tentang Capain Pembelajaran pada Pendidkan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar, dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah (Issue 021).

Delany, C., Kosta, L., Ewen, S., Nicholson, P., Remedios, L., & Harms, L. (2016). Identifying pedagogy and teaching strategies for achieving nationally prescribed learning outcomes. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2016.1138450

Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELC Journal, 34(2), 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368820303400202

Ferdaus, S. A., & Novita, D. (2023). Subject at A Vocational High School in Indonesia. BRILIANT: Jurnal Riset Dan Konseptual, 8(2), 297–310. https://doi.org/10.28926/briliant.v8i2.1201

Gumilar, G., Perdana, D., Rosid, S., & Ghufron, A. (2023). Urgensi penggantian Kurikulum 2013 menjadi Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Papeda, 5(2), 148–155. https://e-journal.unimudasorong.ac.id/index.php/jurnalpendidikandasar/article/view/1825/910

Hadi, A., Marniati, Ngindana, R., Kurdi, M. S., Kurdi, M. S., & Fauziah. (2023). New paradigm of Merdeka Belajar Curriculum in schools. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3126

Hartel, R. W., & Foegeding, E. A. (2004). Learning: Objectives, Competencies, or Outcomes? Journal of Food Science Education, 3(4), 69–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-4329.2004.tb00047.x

Hunaepi, H., & Suharta, I. G. P. (2024). Transforming education in Indonesia : The impact and challenges of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. Path of Science, 10(6), 5026–5039. https://doi.org/10.22178/pos.105-31

Latifa, H., & Ratih, K. (2023). Implementing the Merdeka Curriculum in English Language Teaching : A Study of Teacher Learning Steps. Voices of English Language Education Society, 7(3), 640–651. https://doi.org/10.29408/veles.v7i3.24049

Le, M. D., Nguyen, H. T. M., & Burns, A. (2021). English primary teacher agency in implementing teaching methods in response to language policy reform: a Vietnamese case study. Current Issues in Language Planning, 22(1), 199–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/14664208.2020.1741209

Lestari, M. B., Ahyarudin, D. A., Feriyanti, R., Tanjung, P., Awaliyah, L., Rihatmi, & Margana. (2024). Communicative Practices and Cultural Challenges in Kurikulum Merdeka : The District Teachers ’ Voice. EVOLUTIONARY STUDIES IN IMAGINATIVE CULTURE, 8(3), 138–150. https://doi.org/10.70082/esiculture.vi.1849

Leung, C., & Scarino, A. (2016). Reconceptualizing the Nature of Goals and Outcomes in Language’s Education. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 12300. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12300

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. SAGE Publications.

Macalister, J., & Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Language Curriculum Design (2nd ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429203763

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (Fourth edi). Jossey-Bass.

Novita, B., Afriyanti, R., & Siska, S. (2023). English Teacher ’ s literacy about Learning Outcomes in the Merdeka Curriculum for Elementary School. Jurnal Pendidikan Mandala, 8(3), 975–979. https://doi.org/10.58258/jupe.v8i3.5973

Nugraha, T. S. (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka untuk pemulihan krisis pembelajaran. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2), 251–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v19i2.45301

Nuralawiah, V., Syafrizal, & Baihaqi, A. (2024). An analysis Of the English textbook “English In Mind Second Edition” based on the Merdeka Curriculum. Journal on Education, 06(03), 16046–16056. https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v6i3.5333

Richards, J. C. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Cambridge University Press.

Richards, J. C. (2013). Curriculum Approaches in Language Teaching: Forward, Central, and Backward Design. RELC Journal, 44(1), 5–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/0033688212473293

Rose, H., & McKinley, J. (2023). Content and language integrated learning and English medium instruction (L. Wei, Z. Hua, & J. Simpson (eds.)). Routledge.

Saldaña, J. (2016). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Yuan, R., Liao, W., Wang, Z., Kong, J., & Zhang, Y. (2022). How do English-as-a-foreign-language (EFL) teachers perceive and engage with critical thinking: A systematic review from 2010 to 2020. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 43, 101002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101002

Downloads

Published

2026-06-11

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.